Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


Tomo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Chelsea

Shakhtar CEO Palkin: “Chelsea’s offer for Mudryk has no Ballon d’Or clause. It is achievable bonuses that we feel can be reached.”

Bonuses are €30m — and all related to Champions League and Premier League wins during next years.

📰 Newcastle, Everton, Southampton and Nottingham Forest have enquired about signing Chelsea midfielder Conor Gallagher (Mail)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, TheHulk said:

wow, so if true, we did double Arse (if they only offered £50K PW)

so the entire salary load for Mudryk over 8.5 years is only around £43m

for KK, in less than HALF the time period, we are dumping out close to £62m

around 20m quid MORE for less than half the time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Vesper said:

wow, so if true, we did double Arse (if they only offered £50K PW)

so the entire salary load for Mudryk over 8.5 years is only around £43m

for KK, in less than HALF the time period, we are dumping out close to £62m

around 20m quid MORE for less than half the time

It says Arsenal offered 10k less than Chelsea so not a big difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Vesper said:

wow, so if true, we did double Arse (if they only offered £50K PW)

so the entire salary load for Mudryk over 8.5 years is only around £43m

for KK, in less than HALF the time period, we are dumping out close to £62m

around 20m quid MORE for less than half the time

Hopefully an Italian club will save us from the KK wage bill...

46 minutes ago, Vesper said:

Chelsea

Shakhtar CEO Palkin: “Chelsea’s offer for Mudryk has no Ballon d’Or clause. It is achievable bonuses that we feel can be reached.”

Bonuses are €30m — and all related to Champions League and Premier League wins during next years.

📰 Newcastle, Everton, Southampton and Nottingham Forest have enquired about signing Chelsea midfielder Conor Gallagher (Mail)

@Vesper  would you sacrifice Conor Gallagher (for a good fee) if it helps us get Caicedo? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Reddish-Blue said:

Hopefully an Italian club will save us from the KK wage bill...

@Vesper  would you sacrifice Conor Gallagher (for a good fee) if it helps us get Caicedo? 

already said £50m and it's bye bye Conor for me

we have to sell players, and he can fetch more than he is worth keeping IMHO

the quality of MFers we have and will bring in are beyond him (if not this instant, then soon)

we do need to sort out Homegrown issues (I think the whole HG thing is stupid, why force teams to carry players who are not as good as what's out there on the international market? Fuck England's national team, seriously, they will be fine)

and FUCK Brexit and the 18yo old rule for foreign players (but fuck it in general as well, it does far more damage than bloody football)

all that is why I was more than happy to see us linked with Matty Cash as the reserve RB (I already had suggested him for ages as a possible option)

Noni Madueke is HG, a left footer, can play wingback in a pinch, and is not crazy expensive, so no issues for him as a RWer option

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Vesper said:

I knew that £30K PW figure that the goona fanbois were pushing was bollocks

Wasn't it always obvious the figures from £30-50K a week were bullshit? No player who moves for a fee nearing €100M will accept wages of £1.5-2.5M a year, that's ridiculous. If they did their agent should be sacked on the spot.

Even the 'confirmed' £97K/week seems low for a transfer that big so maybe there are some performance clauses that can increase his total wage package.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Jype said:

Wasn't it always obvious the figures from £30-50K a week were bullshit? No player who moves for a fee nearing €100M will accept wages of £1.5-2.5M a year, that's ridiculous. If they did their agent should be sacked on the spot.

Even the 'confirmed' £97K/week seems low for a transfer that big so maybe there are some performance clauses that can increase his total wage package.

It is still a big transfer but small solace that it is a 62m fee up front and 97k/week salary. Wage structure is not disbalanced by that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Strike said:

It is still a big transfer but small solace that it is a 62m fee up front and 97k/week salary. Wage structure is not disbalanced by that. 

Yeah at first glance it seemed like another terrible overpayment by the new owners but now after getting some specifics it doesn't look too bad. Salary is very reasonable and the add-ons will only be triggered if we win the PL/CL sometime during the contract and if that happens I couldn't care less about some extra payment.

The base fee of £62M is big but to put it into perspective it's not much more than the ones paid for Jorginho, Pulisic, Cucurella and is less than Kepa and Havertz were. If he's a flop it seems really big but if he's a success it's not even worth mentioning because good players go for fees like that all the time now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You