Chelsea Transfers

[ZAPHOD2319 4,803]

So £45m gets it done. We have spent a lot more for less potential.

 

[Pizy 18,877]

City fans not at all happy if this happens.

[DDA 9,928]

Rumours of Mudryk > < ESRowe swap deal!

[lucio 5,418]

never heard of him but certified baller 

[TheHulk 2,424]

Sell him for 50m.

[Vesper 30,119]

14 minutes ago, lucio said:

never heard of him but certified baller 

 

[Pizy 18,877]

Spuds actually look surprisingly competent after Kane has gone. Probably shouldn’t be entertaining any sales to them since Big Ange may be legit good. Anyways, they have Sarr and Bissouma in CM and Maddison at #10 so there really isn’t a place for Gallagher.

Levy has had a default “No Chelsea” policy for years now. So why would we help them out?

[Vesper 30,119]

1 hour ago, Vesper said:

Jesus is injured too often

[Gundalf 805]

3 minutes ago, Vesper said:

No one beats this crazy mf: 

[TheHulk 2,424]

49 minutes ago, Pizy said:

City fans not at all happy if this happens.

They saying they would love a Mudryk Palmer swap as they think Mudryk is a gem, clearly they aren't very bright.

[OneMoSalah 8,885]

£45m for Cole Palmer is madness but yeah, we will pay it.

If people are expecting him to come in and waltz in to the first team and light it up though, don’t. Has talent but again, has a very very small amount of games in senior football - personally if the plan was always going to be another young kid, we would of may as well have kept one of Angelo or Washington.

Edited August 30, 2023 by OneMoSalah

[Gundalf 805]

3 minutes ago, OneMoSalah said:

£45m for Cole Palmer is madness but yeah, we will pay it. 

Well we are living in a world where Forest rejects a £43m bid for Brennan Johnson. 

Edited August 30, 2023 by Gundalf

[Special Juan 28,132]

If Poch has given this the thumbs up then I'm all for it- Yes he's raw, but so is the likes of Mudryk, Noni, Chucky, Lesley, Lavia and others.

We are creating something very exciting here, and I'm right behind this signing

[OneMoSalah 8,885]

1 minute ago, Gundalf said:

Well we live in a world where Forest rejects a £43m bid for Brennan Johnson. 

Johnson got 8 PL goals in his debut PL season. That and his age are always going to give Forest the chance to ask for £45-50m and above. Plus the way the market is, £40-50m is the standard starting price considering the money PL clubs have from the TV deals.

Wouldn’t say we’ve paid value for money for a lot of players under Boehly so Cole Palmer, if the deal was to be done for £40-45m, would probably fall into the same category as well.

Not so worried about the prices as much now as I doubt we will pay value for money often with this ownership now but am a lot more concerned about the profile. Palmer is not proven enough and also doesn’t strike me as the missing piece despite some decent showings for City but again, would they have signed Doku if Palmer was that good and ready to go? 

But I’ve seen Chelsea people making youtube videos and saying he’s great or whatever already. So I guess he is….

[Vesper 30,119]

8 hours ago, lluubbeenn said:

Their recent history with Richarlison and Joao Pedro look good, but I just don't see the physicality in the boy. 

the lad was still just 17 years old a couple of months ago

he looks like he will fill out nicely