MoroccanBlue 5,382 Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 4 hours ago, NikkiCFC said: We lack creativity and finishing. Pulisic is very fast just like CHO. With James and Telles we will not need our wingers to stay wide all the time like you suggested. We will not sign Sancho this summer. Everything suggest this. In 4-2-3-1 we can play something like this: Pulisic Aouar Ziyach Kovacic Kante or add CHO for Aouar and play Ziyach as AM. We have many options. With Telles and James and their crosses and creativity of Puli, Ziyach and Aouar we will solve a lot of our problems. Lets hope striker we will sign turns out good for us. After this we will have only defensive issues. That’s an interesting midfield. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kun Aguer0 36 Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 1 hour ago, Jason said: Cheeky bid for Kane? Do you really think that baldy shithead (Leavy) will sell his best players to us? Do you remember Modrić saga Not to mention double loss this season Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blues Forever 1,232 Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blues Forever 1,232 Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 Vesper 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnnyeye 7,509 Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 On 3/3/2020 at 3:01 AM, Jason said: Speaking of Sancho, this just happened in my FM save... lmao Leicester got him for 70 million Yeboii and Atomiswave 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NikkiCFC 8,324 Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 18 hours ago, Jason said: Cheeky bid for Kane? I hope Utd splash their budget on him rather than Sancho, Grealish... He is new Torres to Chelsea. Meanwhile today more reports about Telles. Johnnyeye 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special Juan 28,141 Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 I'd have Kane here, no doubt about it. Johnnyeye, Vesper and OhForAGreavsie 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Styl1994 188 Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 13 hours ago, Special Juan said: I'd have Kane here, no doubt about it. I wouldn’t getting Torres flashbacks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Styl1994 188 Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 Realistically look at players that will definitely be here next year James Azpilicueta Tomori Christensen Kante Kovacic Gilmour Mount Loftus-Cheek Hudson-Odoi Pulisic Abraham Players that might be here next season Arrizabalaga Caballero Alonso Zouma Rudiger Willian Giroud Players that won’t be at Chelsea next season Emerson Jorginho Barkley Pedro Batshuayi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhForAGreavsie 6,075 Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 3 hours ago, Styl1994 said: I wouldn’t getting Torres flashbacks Big difference is that Kane actually is a good player, while the brief blip at Liverpool is the only part of Nando's career during which he looked anything other than average. It could not, and did not, last however. The injury excuse which has come to be believed is just a convenient nonsense that people tell themselves. No one listened to me when I was saying this during Nando's 'blip', and fair enough, no reason for anyone to take a random forum opinion seriously. In my view however, people don't have much excuse for continuing to buy the myth. I was depressed the day we signed Nando and laughed when the claim was made that we had appointed the unwanted one to get the best out of him. Benitez knew there was no best to find. That's why he was dropping Nando, and regularly subbing him before he left Liverpool. The players knew it too; Danny Murphy explained that anytime he spoke to ex Anfield teammates they talked about what Torres couldn't do rather than what he could, and Jamie Carragher revealed that the squad could not believe it when Chelsea offered £50m for a player they knew wasn't worth anywhere near that money. It really is time for the myth Torres created in a brief spell at Liverpool to stop being spread about. Fernando was an ordinary footballer, Kane is much better. There is no comparison. Vesper and El P. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Styl1994 188 Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 29 minutes ago, OhForAGreavsie said: Big difference is that Kane actually is a good player, while the brief blip at Liverpool is the only part of Nando's career during which he looked anything other than average. It could not, and did not, last however. The injury excuse which has come to be believed is just a convenient nonsense that people tell themselves. No one listened to me when I was saying this during Nando's 'blip', and fair enough, no reason for anyone to take a random forum opinion seriously. In my view however, people don't have much excuse for continuing to buy the myth. I was depressed the day we signed Nando and laughed when the claim was made that we had appointed the unwanted one to get the best out of him. Benitez knew there was no best to find. That's why he was dropping Nando, and regularly subbing him before he left Liverpool. The players knew it too; Danny Murphy explained that anytime he spoke to ex Anfield teammates they talked about what Torres couldn't do rather than what he could, and Jamie Carragher revealed that the squad could not believe it when Chelsea offered £50m for a player they knew wasn't worth anywhere near that money. It really is time for the myth Torres created in a brief spell at Liverpool to stop being spread about. Fernando was an ordinary footballer, Kane is much better. There is no comparison. I believe Kane best years are already behind him 2014-2018. killer1257 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZAPHOD2319 4,818 Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 2 hours ago, Styl1994 said: I believe Kane best years are already behind him 2014-2018. I agree and when a WC athlete starts to lose a step, the decline can be rapid. He could stay excellent for several years, but it has risk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killer1257 3,282 Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 I agree and when a WC athlete starts to lose a step, the decline can be rapid. He could stay excellent for several years, but it has risk.He is very injury prone, so I would stay awayGesendet von meinem SM-G920F mit Tapatalk Vesper and ZAPHOD2319 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhForAGreavsie 6,075 Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 2 hours ago, Styl1994 said: I believe Kane best years are already behind him 2014-2018. 27 minutes ago, ZAPHOD2319 said: I agree and when a WC athlete starts to lose a step, the decline can be rapid. He could stay excellent for several years, but it has risk. 25 minutes ago, killer1257 said: He is very injury prone, so I would stay away Gesendet von meinem SM-G920F mit Tapatalk There is no denying that you could all be right but I suspect it'll be some other club's problem, not Chelsea's. Kane would be well advised to avoid a move to Stamford Bridge. Why invite all the grief he would be bound to get from Spurs fans? Easier to pick another club to move to. Unless it's a straight choice between us and moving back to Arsenal of course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Styl1994 188 Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 2 hours ago, OhForAGreavsie said: There is no denying that you could all be right but I suspect it'll be some other club's problem, not Chelsea's. Kane would be well advised to avoid a move to Stamford Bridge. Why invite all the grief he would be bound to get from Spurs fans? Easier to pick another club to move to. Unless it's a straight choice between us and moving back to Arsenal of course. If Manchester United got Kane they probably couldn’t afford Sancho as well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneMoSalah 8,886 Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 51 minutes ago, Styl1994 said: If Manchester United got Kane they probably couldn’t afford Sancho as well Not necessarily. It just depends. If they sell a few players for decent fees such as Smalling, Lingard, Pereira etc who are longterm contracts and have say 150m at least on top of that they could manage it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Kante 1,643 Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 3 hours ago, OneMoSalah said: Not necessarily. It just depends. If they sell a few players for decent fees such as Smalling, Lingard, Pereira etc who are longterm contracts and have say 150m at least on top of that they could manage it. Not if they do not get CL. If they miss out this year there Adidas deal drops by £25m and I believe their shirt sponsorship also drops significantly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhForAGreavsie 6,075 Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 28 minutes ago, King Kante said: Not if they do not get CL. If they miss out this year there Adidas deal drops by £25m and I believe their shirt sponsorship also drops significantly. If these figures are accurate, they sound like poor negotiating by United. They are still Man Utd, with huge newsworthiness and fanbase. From a sponsor's prospective, they are more attractive without CL, than almost every other club with it. OneMoSalah 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneMoSalah 8,886 Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 1 hour ago, King Kante said: Not if they do not get CL. If they miss out this year there Adidas deal drops by £25m and I believe their shirt sponsorship also drops significantly. United have got more than theyve always played sponsorships really well. I doubt theyd have such ridiculous clauses in every deal. Theyd be stupid to so as would any club. Plus all these sponsors want them to endorse their brand so imagine that at any big club yet alone Man United. If Pogba is sold as well as it has heavily been hinted at, that's at least the chance of another 125m there too on top of anyhring else. Plus if they can shift Sanchez. Van Gaal spent god knows how much when he got there in the summer the season after Moyes was sacked where they didnt have CL too so I dont think no CL is an issue. Was like 60m on Di Maria, 30m on Shaw, 30m on Herrera, 14m on Blind, 16m on Rojo, Falcaos loan fee and huge wages. Few other smaller signings. Somewhere around 150m at least minimum without any major player sales and other big earners such as Rooney, Van Persie, De Gea still there so I dont think Ole wont get that sort of money to spend either if they are fully behind him. Would be silly to assume United wont spend big if they get CL or not. They have almost every season since Woodward took that role. OhForAGreavsie 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrenshah 186 Posted March 6, 2020 Share Posted March 6, 2020 Squad decisions for next year Gk - Kepa, Caballero, Blackman - Need to decide on Kepa in next few weeks if we want to keep him or not, to replace him dont think we will get someone like donarumma or oblak without spendimg a kepa like fortune. Blackman can be our backup keeper and we can have a youth player as 3rd choice Rb - Reece, Azpi - Sorted Lb - Alonso, Emerson, Azpi, Maathsen - Hopefully Telles to replace alonso and emerson Cb - Zouma, Rudiger, Tomori, Cristeansen, Ampadu, Azpi - Someone like Romagnali hopefully to replace zouma 3 midfielders - Kovacic, Jorginho, Kante, Rlc, Gilmour, Gallagher, Ampadu, Mount, Ziyech, Barkley - Sell Barkley and only buy if we end up selling Jorginho or kante Wingers - cho, ziyech, pulisic, mount - buy one winger since mount and ziyech may play on the midfield to get the best out of them Strikers - Tammy, Batshuayi - sell bats and buy another striker and promote another youth player to fill the ranks In short we need a cb, lb, winger and a striker so thats 4 quality players and maybe a gk and a midfielder as well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.