Harry Kane

[Jase 43,479]

Spurs aren't going to sell Kane to us, lads. It's just like how we're not going to sell Mount to them if they come asking.

[Johnnyeye 7,501]

there is no dealing with Levy and Spurs, forget Kane, he’s not coming here and we should prioritize other targets.

Edited June 1, 2021 by Johnnyeye

[DH1988 1,346]

1 hour ago, Blues Forever said:

Levy will demand more than that probably around £150m - £200m.

Who is going to pay that? City have players + cash, but ultimately, do you want someone else's rejects? I mean, Ake has been injury prone all year, Laporte is a good player, but are they after a CB as a priority? Jesus? The guy lost his hunger after a year of pay checks. Unless they offer Sterling to a deal, which I doubt Sterling goes for surely?

What I'm saying is, are there actually that many clubs that will pay for Kane? We may be the only viable cash choice, I don't disagree there would be serious unrest amongst fans, but there already is. What is the alternative for Levy? Let Kane devalue and devalue, sell him next season for 50-60m? 

~edit~ To clarify, I'm not saying that this will come off, I'm saying that what is the alternative that Spurs have if we are the only ones with the cash structure to do it.

Edited June 1, 2021 by DH1988

[Blues Forever 1,232]

9 minutes ago, DH1988 said:

Who is going to pay that? City have players + cash, but ultimately, do you want someone else's rejects? I mean, Ake has been injury prone all year, Laporte is a good player, but are they after a CB as a priority? Jesus? The guy lost his hunger after a year of pay checks. Unless they offer Sterling to a deal, which I doubt Sterling goes for surely?

What I'm saying is, are there actually that many clubs that will pay for Kane? We may be the only viable cash choice, I don't disagree there would be serious unrest amongst fans, but there already is. What is the alternative for Levy? Let Kane devalue and devalue, sell him next season for 50-60m? 

~edit~ To clarify, I'm not saying that this will come off, I'm saying that what is the alternative that Spurs have if we are the only ones with the cash structure to do it.

City maybe, Levy doesn't want to sell Kane anyway.

[chelsea_4_eva 1,180]

A question... what happens when a club does a cash+player swap but the player doesnt want to go to that club?

Life for example city offer cash+laporte to spurs but laporte doesnt want to go to spurs...

[OneMoSalah 8,883]

24 minutes ago, chelsea_4_eva said:

A question ... what happens when a club does a cash + player swap but the player doesnt want to go to that club?

Life for example city offer cash + laporte to spurs but laporte doesnt want to go to spurs ...

Then it won't happen. Or City will need to pay extra cash up for Laporte not going. 

Also City getting rid of Laporte would be one of the stupidest things I have ever seen. Even for Kane. Stones has been rejuvenated but he is still vastly inferior to Laporte.

Edited June 1, 2021 by OneMoSalah

[Fernando 6,585]

24 minutes ago, OneMoSalah said:

Then it won't happen. Or City will need to pay extra cash up for Laporte not going. 

Also City getting rid of Laporte would be one of the stupidest things I have ever seen. Even for Kane. Stones has been rejuvenated but he is still vastly inferior to Laporte.

They are desperate to win cl, and Kane will get them over the line. 

Both teams in the cl final had false 9, but that false 9 will get destroyed with a top striker like Kane.

Short term false 9 helped us, but i don't want us to go that route. Can't ever replace a top striker in a team. 

Edited June 1, 2021 by Fernando

[MoroccanBlue 5,375]

City are not winning the CL with Pep. 

[OneMoSalah 8,883]

hace 14 minutos, Fernando dijo:

They are desperate to win cl, and Kane will get them over the line. 

Both teams in the cl final had false 9, but that false 9 will get destroyed with a top striker like Kane.

Short term false 9 helped us, but i don't want us to go that route. Can't ever replace a top striker in a team. 

I dont think Kane will get them over the line. I really don’t. You need more than one player. Its a team thing.

Plus, for me, Pep will never get it over the line with City or any other club because he will do what he did against us. He will always have that inclination to do something bold. I don’t know why but he just has this in him.

This is why he failed at Bayern in Europe. Too much inclination to tempt fate and try be too smart. Sometimes they were deservedly beat but sometimes he was a huge contributor towards it

Edited June 1, 2021 by OneMoSalah

[Jase 43,479]

46 minutes ago, Fernando said:

They are desperate to win cl, and Kane will get them over the line. 

Both teams in the cl final had false 9, but that false 9 will get destroyed with a top striker like Kane.

Short term false 9 helped us, but i don't want us to go that route. Can't ever replace a top striker in a team. 

There is more than one way to skin a cat.

City won the Premier League, League Cup and got to the Champions League final basically without a striker. They didn't lose the final because of the lack of a #9 but because Guardiola went and complicated his approach for the game. Liverpool also won the Champions League and Premier League without a recognized #9 in Firmino. Of course, you need the others to score their fair share of goals (like Salah and Mane at Liverpool) but City and Liverpool have shown it can be done. And not to mention, Tuchel seems to like the front 3 being very fluid with their movement and like them to be interchangeable. 

[DDA 9,924]

1 hour ago, MoroccanBlue said:

City are not winning the CL with Pep. 

I think they will really struggle now. This year was the perfect opportunity for them to win. Next year will see Byern, Madrid, Liverpool, Ourselves all come back stronger. 

[MoroccanBlue 5,375]

8 minutes ago, DDA said:

I think they will really struggle now. This year was the perfect opportunity for them to win. Next year will see Byern, Madrid, Liverpool, Ourselves all come back stronger. 

We've also showed the whole world how to successfully beat them.