Virgil Van Dijk

[Marvin123 484]

Van Dijk is not a top priority at this stage but #Chelsea are continuing to monitor the ­situation and could make a bid. [Telegraph]

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

[The Skipper 20,593]

What's the point in getting him in now?

[ChelseaFanUK 1,014]

Only way we would go for him now, is if Christensen is part of the deal, or leaving.    4 CB is enough for 3 at the back.   3 start 1 sub.  

[zekinjo 449]

7 hours ago, The Skipper said:

What's the point in getting him in now?

If that's true then I can't easily see us playing Azpi on RWB position.

[Fernando 6,484]

13 hours ago, The Skipper said:

What's the point in getting him in now?

Because Andreas is poor and we can't gamble on that. 

Need this guy. 

[lucio 5,418]

4 minutes ago, Fernando said:

Because Andreas is poor and we can't gamble on that. 

Need this guy. 

andreas is class. VVD is bullwank

[The Skipper 20,593]

20 minutes ago, Fernando said:

Because Andreas is poor and we can't gamble on that. 

Need this guy. 

What are you basing this on sorry? 

[ChelseaFanUK 1,014]

Still think Christensen has been slightly overhyped. Only a friendly but he didnt wow me today.

 

If VVD comes, christensen goes the other way, bet my life on it

[zekinjo 449]

59 minutes ago, ChelseaFanUK said:

Still think Christensen has been slightly overhyped. Only a friendly but he didnt wow me today.

 

If VVD comes, christensen goes the other way, bet my life on it

He's 21 years old never played in 5 at the back so he needs some time. Still, Andreas won every 1on1 situation against Ribery and Lewa today. I can't tell something like that about Azpi and Cahill if we're talking only about CB's. 

[It's too big 625]

1 hour ago, ChelseaFanUK said:

Still think Christensen has been slightly overhyped. Only a friendly but he didnt wow me today.

 

If VVD comes, christensen goes the other way, bet my life on it

Christensen is overhyped, but VVD isn't? Makes sense. 

[Artandur 939]

13 minutes ago, zekinjo said:

He's 21 years old never played in 5 at the back so he needs some time. Still, Andreas won every 1on1 situation against Ribery and Lewa today. I can't tell something like that about Azpi and Cahill if we're talking only about CB's. 

He actually played in 5 at the back for the biggest part of last season.

[Sideshow Luiz 2,310]

I can't see us getting him.  I just don't see the need.  Not that he isn't better than Cahill.  But, we have lots of cover at CB and virtually none at CM and WB.  If we are going to spend this kind of money it really should be to shore up those positions.

[Special Juan 27,439]

He will go to Liverpool eventually.

[Chelsea4 1,521]

Chelsea are preparing a £50m bid for Virgil Van Dijk. (@MattHughesTimes)

Chelsea are optimistic a deal can be agreed with Southampton for Van Dijk this week before the start of the new season. (@MattHughesTimes)

[Pizy 18,415]

Oh my. Not sure I believe we're after another CB.

If we got VVD, though, it's surely the end of Cahill in our first XI?

[Dazzy_Vance 454]

Don't see how we need him but would laugh at Liverpool. 

[Chelsea? 892]

21 minutes ago, Chelsea4 said:

Chelsea are preparing a £50m bid for Virgil Van Dijk. (@MattHughesTimes)

Chelsea are optimistic a deal can be agreed with Southampton for Van Dijk this week before the start of the new season. (@MattHughesTimes)

So tired of this window. Wish it ended August 10th

[oldportblue 547]

would be amazing but he reportedly has his heart set on liverpool... I rate him above all our defenders at CB except maybe luiz who is of a similar level imo


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk