Massacre In Paris

[xPetrCechx 13,563]

But why he wanted to enter after the match, not before and then blew him-self and few hundred or thousand people around him

The first terrorist planned to blew himself in the stands, to create panic that would lead to mass killing.

The Second Terrorist, waited outside the stadium for all the people that could run away from the first explosion inside.

[zolayes 14,489]

Are you going to pray for Kenia?

That was quite a few months ago .. I lived and taught in Kenya so I keep up to date .. I CRIED FOR KENYA

[xPetrCechx 13,563]

But why he wanted to enter after the match, not before and then blew him-self and few hundred or thousand people around him

Sky:

Two of the blasts happened at entrances to the stadium and another at a nearby McDonald's restaurant, with Paris police later confirming two of the explosions were suicide attacks.

So 2 of them tried to enter the stadium and blew themselves up there....

[Rmpr 8,977]

But why he wanted to enter after the match, not before and then blew him-self and few hundred or thousand people around him

He tried to enter during the match and not after.

Pretty much what PeterCech said...

[Spike 12,049]

I am deeply saddened by people trying to justify these attacks. While there are some deeply troubling reasons that lead up to the attack, I don't believe under any circumstances they justify the destruction of human life. Same goes for any incident of a similar nature.

[Melanicus 5,208]

Are you going to pray for Kenia?

Why are you posting a news from April?

[zolayes 14,489]

Yep sorry my mate posted this.

THats ok but I follow all the Kenya news and it is the POOR people who suffer most through the terrorists. They are trying to destroy the country's economy and as

always it is the weakest and poorest who suffer most

[manpe 10,861]

Questions to any atheist here.

When someone writes pray for peace what does that means to you?

I believe in God and I definitely understand that prayer is communication with God.

What is your thoughts and meaning of such?

Would you get offended if someone told you to pray for so and so?

Offended? Lmao, only pussies get offended by stuff like that. When somebody tells me to pray for something, then you can just substitute the word "pray" with "hope" and this is the meaning it has to me.

[Kieran. 6,317]

Tough Times...

RIP to all the victims.

I'm not surprised that such thing happened in France... Their immigration Rules are too soft and now they got paid for it.

I have nothing against Muslims, but 90% of the terrorists are muslims. shame that the peaceful ones will suffer now.

Every Country in Europe need to Check themselves now.

Today it's Paris, Tomorrow unfortunately it can be London.

90% of terrorists are white people. Look at throughout history bro. Look at colonialism. Look at slavery. Look at school shootings and movie theater shootings in the USA.

People of color aren't the only terrorists out there, in fact we aren't even the majority.

[Spike 12,049]

90% of terrorists are white people.

I find both of your claims incredibly stupid. Way to shoehorn a religion and a 'race' into something as asinine as 'terrorist'.

People can barely agree what constitutes 'terrorism' let alone what constitutes a white person.

[Kieran. 6,317]

I find both of your claims incredibly stupid. Way to shoehorn a religion and a 'race' into something as asinine as 'terrorist'.

People can barely agree what constitutes 'terrorism' let alone what constitutes a white person.

Great thank you for your input.

[Spike 12,049]

Great thank you for your input.

Thanks for yours too. Very insightful.

[Kieran. 6,317]

Thanks for yours too. Very insightful.

Favorite member on these forums by far

[MefiX19 1,092]

@Rmpr @xPetrChechx oh... i got it now, that was actually a clever plan.

[Spike 12,049]

For instance most Muslims from North Africa and the middle-east are Caucasian. Caucasian is often used in exchange with 'white person' but people of middle-eastern descent are considered 'white' for some reason. I'm Caucasian and white but Zidane isn't?I don't get the pointless semantics of it. Why not just say 'western-European' since most of the time that is what people are referring to as 'white people'.

On another not 'people-of-colour' is one of the stupidest terms I've ever head. I'm not a coloured person? There is something different about me to the others? Why make another us vs them term? It is so stupid, my GF is South-East Asian which is a PoC if I'm correct but can't relate to Afro-Americans another PoC in the slightest manner in terms of racial and cultural prejudice. To me it is just another term that exasperates the difference and divide between races.

I think at the end of the day it is less about us vs them but how the strong can take advantage of the weak, it just happens it conveniently can be manipulated by those in power as 'us vs them'. Look at all the black on black violence in Africa that serves no purpose other than to give more power to those on top of the dog pile. At the very core of all these issues, it is the strong taking advantage of the weak.

This was smashed out in a few minutes so I'm sorry if it comes off abrasive or hypocritical in any manner, I'll adress those issues later.

EDIT:

More examples of terrorism carried out by people that aren't white or Muslim

Japan Imperialism of the 20th century

Chinese Imperialism, Tibet, Taiwan, etc

North Korea's facist regime

Che Guevara (was he white or native American?) in Bolivia and Cuba

Bombings in Bombay

2008 Christmas Massacre

Muslim Massacre in the Central African Republic

General Butt Naked

Ghenghis Khan's invasion of essentially the whole world

Yanghzou Massacre

Polynesian Cannibalism in New Zealand (I think?)

There is so much evidence of terrorism in world history.

Terrorism isn't limited to Muslims or whites. Anybody, anywhere throughout life and history could be a terrorist. To make assumptive remarks like '90% of terrorists are white people or Muslims' is a very harmful statement to make.

[zolayes 14,489]

@Spike .. for something written off the cuff it was IMO very lucid and analytical

[Fulham Broadway 16,923]

Yeah because unlike in europe those people in middle east cant live with each other beacause of their 'religion' that is going on for hundreds of years. Sure the usa shouldnt get involved because of their real intentions, but european got involved to save people down there who are innocent. Sure we wont just let them kill each other and not try to help. But bottom line is that there are some crazy people who mix religion with fucked up ideals and drag people into this to create army and war etc. Raising kids from their early ages to become living bomb one day. That is messed up.

Dont compare europe to middle east. They cant live in peace. We can. Sure bombings from eu planes on their cities are not justified, but it was a decision to stop ISIS from spreading. Ironicaly we let hundreds and hudreds people thru borders every day.

Even if there is just 1 percent of 20m (or how many people will get in eu in couple years), thats enough to close borders and secure europe from more terrorists. Its obvious there are terorists among refugees. I have nothing against refugees who want to escape their land (althrough they should fight for their land in first place like europeans fought for ours. We didnt just escape in time of wars ffs) but I have major hatred towards any terrorist or even idealists of their religion because those will never live in peace. And that is enough to close borders.

We had wwi and wwii and didnt escape. War ended because we wanted that. We fought for it. Middle east doesnt know what they are fighting for. For religion? Sorry but fuck that. If their religion is killing people its just wrong. If they wanted to stop the war they would get together ask for help and thats it. But no they want to solve it on their own for years and years and years. And i dont want that to be spread in europe.

Everyone knows Isis is financed by usa or their agencies and Merkel is Obamas bitch (sorry for expresion but its true). Trying to destabilize EU. And sure terrorists are the easiest way to destabilize that.

Sure everyone is nice and all now but people must be fooling themselves if they think paris was exception. There will be more and more of that. In couple years france will have same number of muslims as they have caucasians. Try to stop that when it will be to late will only lead to extreme decisions. And yet people think everything will be fine. Im not sure what governments are thinking. Living in delusion. And when you will be in danger, you will only then realise allowing all this and being nice was a mistake. Every single person on borders would be ideal. If that is not possible close borders. Its for greater good.

Wake the fuck up. Stop praying and start thinking.

I dont think you understood my post. There seems to be two schools of thought, and responses to the medieval Middle Eastern death cults such as ISIS. One is 'oh its our fault, creating a power vacuum from neo Colonialism in Iraq, libya etc'. The other is to be gung ho and bomb and kill. Both approaches fuel the young idealistic jihadist God botherers.

Ironically in France and Germany there was a similar vein of thought up until the 18th century that things were ordained by god and that Kings had divine right bestowed upon them from above. To challenge this was heresy.

Cue reasoning, science, and rational thought - The Enlightenment, and revolution. This is the only way forward for human progress.

[-Kaplan- 410]

Weren't there bombings in Beirut that killed like 43 people? Supposedly ISIS took the blame for that as well.