Rumoured Ezequiel Lavezzi

[MrBlueGuy 1,552]

Roman has only commanded one transfer. Andriy Shevchenko.

And Fernando Torres

[yuvala 2,167]

And Fernando Torres

Wasn't it Carlo ?

[The Skipper 20,609]

Wasn't it Carlo ?

It was. Ray Wilkins said that Torres was a Carlo buy.

[sherry33 234]

It was. Ray Wilkins said that Torres was a Carlo buy.

I thought Carlo said Torres was not his buy and im pretty sure i heard that somewhere..

[mediator 2,026]

It's funny because on PSG forums they would be happy to get rid of him.

He is inconsistent and missed a lot according to them.

The work-rate is there, no doubt about it, but he can't play the whole 90 min...

[sherry33 234]

It's funny because on PSG forums they would be happy to get rid of him.

He is inconsistent and missed a lot according to them.

The work-rate is there, no doubt about it, but he can't play the whole 90 min...

Reminds me of us when we wanted to get rid of Kalou.

[YouNameIt 1,511]

I didn't say he doesn't suit Mourinho's style but he is excess to requirement.I wouldn't swap any of our 5 attacking midfielders for this guy, not even Salah. I'd rather throw the cash for another CM

And why the fuck would u rather keep salah than getting lavezzi?

Please do explain this will be interesting.

[iseah100 5,612]

And why the fuck would u rather keep salah than getting lavezzi?

Please do explain this will be interesting.

Salah played for us. He's 21. Fast, left footed, and was cheaper than Lavezzi. He's different than our other wingers. Lavezzi is shit.

Why would you rather get Lavezzi?

[Sidzeret 2,257]

And why the fuck would u rather keep salah than getting lavezzi?

Please do explain this will be interesting.

Look up....iseah100 explained it well.

It seems that you want to do like for like swaps and enter once transition again. Lucky you are not our manager.

[BlueLion. 21,491]

And why the fuck would u rather keep salah than getting lavezzi?

Please do explain this will be interesting.

Possibly because Salah is eight years younger and has years and years to grow and meet his potential. Lavezzi's best days are quite possibly behind him. "He isn't getting any younger", as they say. Plus you won't have any melodramatics from Salah. He isn't the sort to moan about being on the bench. Salah is a squad signing, and a damned good one at that, for good money. Lavezzi would be another £20 million+ investment that you'll probably get two years out of, maybe three at an absolute push. Salah is also considerably faster than Lavezzi and offers something different. Lavezzi is in a very similar mould to Willian - he'd offer nothing new. His work-rate is fantastic but no better than Schurrle's, Willian's, or Oscar's.

So maybe that would explain "why the fuck" some people would rather keep Salah than spunking £20 million+ on someone who probably isn't fit enough to complete 90 minutes. I'm presuming you're basing your opinions on Salah on the half-dozen starts he made for us during a transitional period?

As Sidzeret says, it's lucky you're not in charge of our transfer policy.

[nadavTKL 1,787]

According to Di Marzio he's set to sign a new contract.

[LucienDillonCFC 77]

Good, we deffinatly dont need him!

[Strike 7,474]

Good

[Amin Sarmadi 24]

Chelsea target Ezequiel Lavezzi’s agent has met with the Blues over a possible deal, according to the L’Equipe website.

[xPetrCechx 13,570]

Chelsea target Ezequiel Lavezzi’s agent has met with the Blues over a possible deal,

according to the L’Equipe website.

Nothing There.