Suarez bites Ivanovic

[Special Juan 28,096]

He shouldn't play anymore this season and games into the new season.

[Muzchap 8,966]

When do we find out ? tomorrow? Or Thurdsay?

[Hutcho 8,443]

Should definitely be more than 3 games...

True related story

My mum works in the local primary school. And this week their have been two instances where a child has needed some form of treatment for bitemarks. And in one occasion they drew blood. Now this is crazy behaviour and a reflection on a whole manner of things, but it shows the reach of how it effects SOME really young children. And therefore should be dealt with in a different manner than a bog standard violent conduct charge even if the actual harm to ivanovic's arm is very minimal.

[Hutcho 8,443]

I don't like evra, but i think it would be very harsh for him to get fined. Everyone has made a joke about this in some way. He didn't really do anything wrong.

[The only place to be 11,313]

TEN GAMES

Have it you cunt!!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22278258

[Jase 43,479]

Suarez has received a 10-match ban for his bite. News just came up. Lovely.

Sky Sports News ‏@SkySportsNews

Liverpool striker Luis Suarez banned for 10 games #SSN

[Special Juan 28,096]

Fantastic.

[The only place to be 11,313]

Lads, get some popcorn.

http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=305346.0

And just to state the obvious, that's his season over plus the first SIX games of next season.

[Ryan Fong 2,776]

Say bye bye to your psycho biter Suarez Liverscums fans~~~

[blu35_army 551]

How about Suarez's ban is reduced to 5 games and Chelsea get the two points that were stolen from them on Sunday? That would be justice.

[Jase 43,479]

Bryan Swanson ‏@skysports_bryan

A three-match ban begins immediately. Luis Suarez has until midday on Friday to appeal the additional seven-match suspension.

[Leif 6,006]

Looking at this from a neutral view and pretending he bit someone else not associated with Chelsea, all I've been thinking is the following:-

He was found guilty (if I remember correctly) for racial abuse towards Evra. The F.A. are clear that they have NO TOLERANCE towards racism.

He's now clearly been found guilty due to undeniable video proof from several angles that he's committed assault on a fellow professional. The F.A. are clear that they have NO TOLERANCE towards abuse & assault.

So my question is; If the F.A. have 'No Tolerance' like they claim, why is he just getting a slap on the wrist and a 12-game ban? I assume Liverpool will still pay him his wages throughout that time unless they specifically try and make an example out of him to try and prevent their club's image from falling any further, meaning he'll basically be getting an extended holiday!!

After 2 high-profile incidents in this league already and the Premier League clearly slowing down in terms of quality and being quickly caught up by the Bundesliga, surely, as harsh as this may sound, Liverpool should be forced to either sell Suarez to another league or release him from his contract? He is single handedly bringing down the league with; 1: Racism. 2: Assault. 3: His well documented diving. (Oh, and a few deliberate hand-balls along the way.)

That would be 'No Tolerance' and prevent other players from doing as he does as it would cut-short their time in the most watched league in world football.

As we all know, I guess the F.A. are just a joke, aren't they?

[Special Juan 28,096]

It should upped if they appeal and even to consider reducing it on appeal would be pathetic. If the FA reduce it they are showing people they made a mistake, that in itself doesn't bode well, plus a sign of weakness.

The FA have this right, now don't back down to appeals.

[Ryan Fong 2,776]

Lads, get some popcorn.

http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=305346.0

And just to state the obvious, that's his season over plus the first SIX games of next season.

Must be better than IRONMAN 3.... I can't stop laughing reading it.

[The only place to be 11,313]

The way I see it is that he got a 7 match ban in Holland for the same thing, didn't learn and did it again. When you throw in his poor record (the racism ban in particular) then I really don't know what the fuss is.

For me 7 games was the absolute minimum, plus 3 for being a repeat offender. If they appeal this then they should add on at least 1 more game to his ban but I feel this will be reduced to 7-8 games.