Jump to content

Victor Moses


Superblue
 Share

Recommended Posts

We dont because they are not good. Moses was the only Nigerian around that would fit in Chelsea transfer politics: young and winger, and he even had PL experience. The fact that Emenalo is from same country played a part on the deal, as simple as that.

nonsense. as simple as that.

moses put in briliant performances against united, arsenal and in general was one of the best players in the league in the last month or so of the 2011-12 season.

we had already splashed out cash to get oscar, hazard, azpi, marin. what we had needed at that moment was a squad player who would fill in the quota of the HG player and wont be costly at all. moses for 7mil was a GOOD DEAL. his transfer had nothing to do with the fact that he and emanalo are nigerian.

a lot of weird and absolutely rubbish opinions are posted on this forum but yours in beyond comparision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We dont because they are not good. Moses was the only Nigerian around that would fit in Chelsea transfer politics: young and winger, and he even had PL experience. The fact that Emenalo is from same country played a part on the deal, as simple as that.

Well that I agree with. But that is completely different than saying that we bought Moses because he is Nigerian. We bought him because he is a good young winger who had PL experience and would fit in the homegrown quota. The fact that he's Nigerian might have helped the deal but that's not why we bought him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We dont because they are not good. Moses was the only Nigerian around that would fit in Chelsea transfer politics: young and winger, and he even had PL experience. The fact that Emenalo is from same country played a part on the deal, as simple as that.

Lol......this really kills this forum

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No sarcasm. More like reality. Moses should be given a chance to play elsewhere. Later Chelsea will look at his progress & act accordingly. Anything wrong with it ?

No I actually like the idea of loaning him out with all the wingers we have now, but not necessarily to Liverpool. Idealy I would have liked him to play a role here like he did last season if we had not bought Willian (and that guy who's last name sounds like a sneeze).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No I actually like the idea of loaning him out with all the wingers we have now, but not necessarily to Liverpool. Idealy I would have liked him to play a role here like he did last season if we had not bought Willian (and that guy who's last name sounds like a sneeze).

LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No I actually like the idea of loaning him out with all the wingers we have now, but not necessarily to Liverpool. Idealy I would have liked him to play a role here like he did last season if we had not bought Willian (and that guy who's last name sounds like a sneeze).

Well, does it really matter where he goes ? Liverpool...whoever takes him. As long as he gets to play, develop to a better player & then Chelsea decide whether to take him back or sell him for some profit. To some of you, it might be questionable dealings, but to me business as usual, as I have seen over the last several years by Chelsea. Certainly, I approve of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You