Eden Hazard

[TacticalBlues 2,817]

I wouldn't say he's embarrassed, he is now a famous dickfaced brat and he's laughing his ass off knowing that Hazard got red-carded because of him. Just take a look at the number of the followers he has gained in less than 24 hours, in a few hours he'll probably reach the 100k mark.

It's notoriety rather than fame. He'll lose his followers sooner rather than later. Nonetheless the fact that he is 17 verging on 18, (right when I started Uni for goodness sake) and is a ballboy diving around the floor waving and imaginary card from a dubious toe poke has rightly made him the center of ridicule worldwide. He may of laughed at the time but sine then there has been a huge backlash. The kid's spoilt to the bone and I'm sure if he has any conscience, little though it seems, he would feel somewhat embarrassed.

[Jase 43,479]

Sam Wallace ‏@SamWallaceIndy

South Wales police following up calls from "members of the public living in Sussex, Kent & West Wales" in relation to Eden Hazard/ball-boy

Not forgetting it was an off-duty policeman whose complaint about John Terry launched the investigation into the Anton Ferdinand affair

[edetarod 2,155]

wouldn't mind if Hazard was banned for 3 matches, we should rest him anyway

and than we can all move on

[TheCount 146]

wouldn't mind if Hazard was banned for 3 matches, we should rest him anyway

and than we can all move on

As long as someone breaks the self proclaimed "king of the ball boys" legs aye.

[Zone 290]

Happiest man in this saga has to be Foy. He couldn't wait to show red.

[bushman 2,043]

The question:

What would anyone else have done in Hazard´s case ?

Chelsea were just on the brink of elimination, Hazard was frustrated while some fuck is delaying the game.

[Superblue 6,372]

The story has turned...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2267629/Eden-Hazard-ball-boy-row-new-footage-supports-Belgian-claim-kicked-ball.html

It's gone from '£170,000 p/w footballer kicks ball boy' to 'spoilt rich kid bragged about timewasting before match' and 'new angle may clear Hazard'.

The reprehensibility of the press is matched only by it's predictability.

Exactly the problem with the English media. They went straight for Hazard last night, everyone from journalists to TV/radio pundits, feeling safe that this would be the side of the fence most of the public would sit on. The Daily Telegraph even wrote an article saying that Hazard may get a 5 game ban - how would they fucking know that! It's just to plant seeds into the decision makers at the FA to pretty much burn Hazard.

Now today with all the additional information leaking out, not to mention a lot of support and backing Hazard has received from fellow professionals, they've realised they've acted like idiots and now go complete circle the other way!

At least Hazard is starting to get a lot of support within the media which will hopefully help his case. I would expect from a PR perspective the club will accept a 3 match ban if this is what he gets, but I do think there are a lot of factors and evidence that would help an appeal over any sort of ban.

[Rambo 1,729]

It's even more irritating to know that he's a spoiled little bitch living off the riches of his dad.

[HRiver 1,512]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2267779/Eden-Hazard-kicks-Swansea-ball-boy-game--play-here.html

Have fun.

[Jase 43,479]

Chelsea's Eden Hazard has an exemplary disciplinary record

[Waterfall 893]

Most papers are predicting the ban to remain at 3 games. Good time to rest for him.

[Rmpr 8,977]

It's even more irritating to know that he's a spoiled little bitch living off the riches of his dad.

Why?

[KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607]

The new camera angle showing he kicked the ball and not the 17 year old douche could actually keep his ban to just 3 games. If the FA was run using common sense (which it is of course not) the red card would be rescinded.

[Hkibou 622]

If it'd been Torres he'd have shot the ball too, but the boy would have no head left ...

[super_frank8 186]

You are missing the point there are no victms and villans. Everyone did something they werent supposed to, they all have their blame percentage (Foy, Faggot, Hazard, FA, Fans, Williams, etc). It is not about one being right and the other wrong....

I agree with most of what you said, it is just that I think there are more ways to see it than through Hazard's or Faggot's eyes. A neutral one that can see Hazard shouldnt have done that, but the "kid" was a cunt as well.

I only wanted to point that out, do not really want a discussion out of this!

I think you're missing the point too mate.

From many neutral's & even arch-rival's perspectives, ranging from supporters, to journalists, to ex-players/managers & numerous current top flight players - none of which would be inclined to give Chelsea much credit even where it is legitimately due - they have actually gone as far as to not only recognise how preposterous the decision to give Hazard a red card was, but to also publicly voice their own varying degrees of disgust regarding the actions & behaviour of the cuntbag who catalysed that result.

So your 'neutral' objective perspective isn't quite as straightforward as you seem to believe it is.

I don't see what Hazard did wrong whatsoever given the circumstances & I don't see how any other football player in the world would have reacted any differently.

Therefore, the entire situation's inception is indeed all down to this baby walrus deciding to belly flop on top of the ball by his own accord, & even then refusing to allow a player to simply grasp the ball from him in as calm & amicable a fashion as possible, despite several attempts from Hazard to do so as displayed by video evidence.

& therefore, the plump cunt is most definitely the one at fault here for instigating the events that followed, purely due to his own pretentious pussy bullshit - then going on to blatantly deceive all those gullible enough to believe it, that he was actually somehow hurt by the most subtle of toe-pokes, especially through his padded jacket - despite replays from various angles clearly showing that Hazard kicked the ball & not the boy.

So please do explain to me what exactly Eden has done wrong in this situation? How else was he supposed to obtain the ball once this fucktard decided to lie on top of it in a blatant attempt to prevent him from doing so?

Hazard, being of sound mind & body, simply did what any semi-intelligent person with basic football ability would do & just toe-poked it out from underneath him. I fail to see how it is Hazard's fault that this mug decided to be a little fucking bitch after realising he had been outwitted & wouldn't be able to waste more time holding on to the ball as he had intended & pre-meditated the previous day.

The fact is, the cunt felt embarassed that his clear lack of mental & scrotal capacity had been exposed for all to see with his failed attempt at time-wasting - but he saw the opportunity to take advantage of modern media hype & the anti-Chelsea phenomenon to get himself in the spotlight - so he decided to resort to alternative methods of achieving his ultimate goal.

Do you actually think he was harmed/injured in any way as a result of that kick?

If so, then you're just fucking delusional & I guess I can't really help you out there mate. If not, then please feel free to enlighten me as to what it is that Hazard actually did wrong in this exactly?

Because from all of the evidence provided, as is displayed in abundance all over youtube, twitter & facebook - there is nothing whatsoever to suggest that he committed 'assault' of any kind, nor to indicate that he performed a violent act of misconduct with malicious intent, recklessness or other conjured claims. Yet there is overwhelming evidence that proves pre-meditation & purely invented reaction on the ball boy's part.

I mean if your point is that he deserves to be punished for getting involved at all - did you really expect him to just wait around doing nothing when the twat clearly had no other intentions besides wasting as much time as possible & he was the closest player in proximity? I just don't understand how you can possibly condemn his actions in any way, when the only thing on his mind was getting the ball back so we could get on with the game, & the only thing on this cunt's mind was preventing him from doing so by whatever means necessary.

As far as I can see, it is just purely wrongful defamation of Eden's character - I could not feel more sympathy for the poor guy in this entirely fucked up situation - & I could not be more disgusted by those that believe he holds any kind of blame for doing what anyone who has played the game would do when being forced to retrieve the ball from a stubborn beached whale with an agenda.