🇧🇪 Eden Hazard

[Hamilton 2,120]

2 hours ago, Laylabelle said:

Still don't get why he got a huge banner! Like a hanging one yes fair enough but a pass along one. Nope! 

Probably last possible (desperate?) attempt to change his mind..

 

[Henrique 9,133]

He won't be sold this window. I'm 100% sure.

[Vesper 31,180]

2 minutes ago, Henrique said:

He won't be sold this window. I'm 100% sure.

[OneMoSalah 9,122]

On 07/05/2019 at 5:27 PM, Vybz Kartel said:

If Madrid are not going to pay above and beyond for him we should just keep Fatty, its hard to replace talent like his so we cant give it to them for a bargain. In a world were Pulisic goes for 60 million, we better get double that for Hazard even if he has 1 year on his contract. He is the face of the club, his influence goes way past just the pitch. Kids buy new kits every year because of him, some people renew season tickets just to watch him play, people visit Stamford Bridge to watch him so i hope Marina takes Madrid to the cleaners for Hazard. 

Would like to think its because their Chelsea fans..... but if its purely just for Hazard I would suppose theyll be off to buy season tickets at the Bernabau next year. Simple as that. Great playsrs come and go unfortunately but thats life, the football clubs been here long before Eden and will be here long after him. Someone else will be the face of the club over the next however long and again when they move on it will be the same cycle. I mean when the likes of Terry, Cole, Lampard, Drogba werent at their best people and eventually left people were worried because we were losing some of the most iconic players in the clubs history or wouldnt be able to find players like them at their best but as we seen we still had success with various other players of a high standard. Losing Eden is what it is, was inevitable eventually be it if he retired here or was gonna leave to pursue his career somewhere. Sure we will be fine one way or another.

[robsblubot 3,595]

I honestly think his potential absence is greatly exaggerated. Folks are thinking of what we have now, but a reminder that he is our top earner. These type of wages can attract excellent players to our club.

 

[Belgiannutt 3,201]

6 hours ago, Robchels said:

I honestly think his potential absence is greatly exaggerated. Folks are thinking of what we have now, but a reminder that he is our top earner. These type of wages can attract excellent players to our club.

 

He isn't, both Kante and Higuain make more. 290k per week  and 270k per week. Hazard makes 200k a week.

 

[robsblubot 3,595]

8 hours ago, Belgiannutt said:

He isn't, both Kante and Higuain make more. 290k per week  and 270k per week. Hazard makes 200k a week.

 

Fair enough, but he’s not the highest earner only because he does not want to be.

point being he does enjoy a certain status at the club that can be very very appealing to certain players.

[killer1257 3,282]

So his last goal at the bridge was still special. Legend

[Jase 43,479]

AAAARRRRRGGGGHHHHHH!!!!!!

 

[1905didierblue 748]

All talk, no show. What an abysmal last home performance.

[OneMoSalah 9,122]

1 hour ago, Jason said:

AAAARRRRRGGGGHHHHHH!!!!!!

 

Honestly think these sort of interviews make it more and more obvious hes off and that his mind isnt 110% on the season still although again his performance tonight wouldnt exactly prove otherwise, it may be almost done but still. Any other player wouldnt say anything but as weve seen with Eden, Lukaku, Courtous, de Bruyne it must be a Belgian thing 😂 I wont miss these sort of interviews.or the ones he does when with the NT when he goes tbf. 

[robsblubot 3,595]

3 hours ago, OneMoSalah said:

Honestly think these sort of interviews make it more and more obvious hes off and that his mind isnt 110% on the season still although again his performance tonight wouldnt exactly prove otherwise, it may be almost done but still. Any other player wouldnt say anything but as weve seen with Eden, Lukaku, Courtous, de Bruyne it must be a Belgian thing 😂 I wont miss these sort of interviews.or the ones he does when with the NT when he goes tbf. 

Honestly don’t think it has anything to do with his commitment. He’s just not that influential or at least not consistently enough.

just fuck off already. Let the club plan and give the much sought-after free role to someone who wants to improve and become the player some here think hazard is.

[Blue Armour 4,759]

1 hour ago, Robchels said:

Honestly don’t think it has anything to do with his commitment. He’s just not that influential or at least not consistently enough.

just fuck off already. Let the club plan and give the much sought-after free role to someone who wants to improve and become the player some here think hazard is.

Seriously?

Granted you're not his fan, but come on

 

[Blue Armour 4,759]

5 hours ago, 1905didierblue said:

All talk, no show. What an abysmal last home performance.

Not his most spectacular performance, but after setting up Ruben for the first goal and scoring the winning penalty, that's hardly abysmal.

[Blue Armour 4,759]

1 hour ago, Robchels said:

Honestly don’t think it has anything to do with his commitment. He’s just not that influential or at least not consistently enough.

just fuck off already. Let the club plan and give the much sought-after free role to someone who wants to improve and become the player some here think hazard is.

Also, the free role is given to someone who knows exactly what they're doing on the pitch, and there is no one else in the squad that does that. 

If we did have someone, then you wouldn't see the team constantly passing the ball to Hazard and expecting him to conjure up something.

If you think we should buy someone who can do that, the club could have gone ahead and just done that a long time ago. What does that have to do with having Hazard in the squad?

[1905didierblue 748]

53 minutes ago, Blue Armour said:

Not his most spectacular performance, but after setting up Ruben for the first goal and scoring the winning penalty, that's hardly abysmal.

Mate, if willian had that performance, he would be crucified. 

Hazard was anonymous. Uncharacteristically lost the ball a number of times. Hardly tracked back or closed down.

I don't think we should give him accolades for the penalty, it was the bare minimum he could do for us.

Let's just hope it was due to the exhaustion of a long long season. And now he has 20.days to fill up on his energy resources. 

[MCM4PR3Z 411]

1 hour ago, 1905didierblue said:

Mate, if willian had that performance, he would be crucified. 

Hazard was anonymous. Uncharacteristically lost the ball a number of times. Hardly tracked back or closed down.

I don't think we should give him accolades for the penalty, it was the bare minimum he could do for us.

Let's just hope it was due to the exhaustion of a long long season. And now he has 20.days to fill up on his energy resources. 

That assist was savage. How many players can do this worldwide? Willian would never be able to do this.

[robsblubot 3,595]

2 hours ago, Blue Armour said:

Seriously?

Granted you're not his fan, but come on

 

Yeah come on... He hasn’t signed a new deal and wants out... what’s a club to do? Move on and move on already... I wasn’t as much of a fan as others around here, now I’m kinda really sick of him. Hate his demeanor, on and off the pitch.

answering your second point, like many of his fans like to say, the club has been incapable of adding quality around hazard, which essentially proves, to me at least, that having such a player may be detrimental to the squad.

as in, the squad would benefit more from 2 additional good players instead of hazard. The ban is unfortunate obviously, but hope it can be lifted at least for this window.

[Strike 7,853]

43 minutes ago, Robchels said:

Yeah come on... He hasn’t signed a new deal and wants out... what’s a club to do? Move on and move on already... I wasn’t as much of a fan as others around here, now I’m kinda really sick of him. Hate his demeanor, on and off the pitch.

answering your second point, like many of his fans like to say, the club has been incapable of adding quality around hazard, which essentially proves, to me at least, that having such a player may be detrimental to the squad.

as in, the squad would benefit more from 2 additional good players instead of hazard. The ban is unfortunate obviously, but hope it can be lifted at least for this window.

It essentially proves the club made bad decisions in getting players to support him. Not that the club is incapable because he is around

[the wes 7,212]

10 hours ago, Jason said:

AAAARRRRRGGGGHHHHHH!!!!!!

 

Hazard would make a great politician 😂😂 just can't give you a straight answer