Wishlist Hulk

[didierforever 7,349]

But its not a done deal, thats the thing, and as a member who I have never seen here before and only has 27 posts, Don't tell me where to post and where to not post, Thanks.

chill dude. every1 should just remember that

WE ARE EUROPEAN CHAMPIONS.

[Billy. 2,742]

Transfer News Central

6 minutes ago via Mobile

Hulk: "We know that news about my future come out on a daily basis, but I am trying not to talk about it and leave everything in the hands of my agent,"

"I am sure that the best solution will be found, but all I am thinking about is being part of coach Mano Menezes' plans for the Olympic Games." -W.

[Henrique 9,133]

Ok, I'm getting dick of it at this stage.

WHEN THE DEAL IS DONE, IT HAS TO BE PUT UP ON THE PORTGUESE STOCK EXCHANGE, SO WE WILL ALL KNOW WHEN IT IS, THE REPORTS ARE WRONG, ITS NOT A DONE DEAL YET, AND WON'T BE UNTIL ITS UP ON THE STOCK EXCHANGE

Get out!

[HNKS 508]

People need to chill. The transfer window hasnt even opened yet we are closing to signing two world class players. Life is aaaaaammmmmmaaaazzzzzzinnnngggg.

[Igi26 346]

People need to chill. The transfer window hasnt even opened yet we are closing to signing two world class players. Life is aaaaaammmmmmaaaazzzzzzinnnngggg.

You are not right. It's open from today.

[MGuerreiro 252]

You are not right. It's open from today.

You are incorrect. The transfer window formally opens on July 1st, but regardless, English teams are allowed to sign players after their last competitive match.

[zolayes 14,489]

Ok, I'm getting sick of it at this stage.

WHEN THE DEAL IS DONE, IT HAS TO BE PUT UP ON THE PORTGUESE STOCK EXCHANGE, SO WE WILL ALL KNOW WHEN IT IS, THE REPORTS ARE WRONG, ITS NOT A DONE DEAL YET, AND WON'T BE UNTIL ITS UP ON THE STOCK EXCHANGE

thanks I could read that without my glasses

[Kostas 1,468]

Having not paid much attention to this thread since the first 20 pages when we were debating whether he was worth sacrificing Sturridge for and if 20m, never-mind 100 or 40, were a fair representation of his value I must say I'm completely baffled by the current hype around him, the need for his transfer and the economics of the rumored deal.

[Sheva. 5,373]

Having not paid much attention to this thread since the first 20 pages when we were debating whether he was worth sacrificing Sturridge for and if 20m, never-mind 100 or 40, were a fair representation of his value I must say I'm completely baffled by the current hype around him, the need for his transfer and the economics of the rumored deal.

It's all because of his name

[Slam Dunk 1,442]

Having not paid much attention to this thread since the first 20 pages when we were debating whether he was worth sacrificing Sturridge for and if 20m, never-mind 100 or 40, were a fair representation of his value I must say I'm completely baffled by the current hype around him, the need for his transfer and the economics of the rumored deal.

As soon as I saw we were linked with Hulk again this year, I did have my concerns about Sturridge, and whether Hulk arriving would see Danny leaving. The conclusion i've come to is, Sturridge has come out to the media numerous times saying he wishes to play CF rather than RW. If he is spent half the amount of time he spends complaining actually working on his game, he'd be a nailed on starter on the right side. If he wishes to play CF, he is going to be back up to Torres and Hulk, a player who is happy to play on the right, takes his place in the side. I'd say he is forcing himself out of the side, after such a promising start to the season, which is really disappointing. I'd rather have a player happy to be playing in the position he's told to, than someone with a poor attitude, so, in my opinion, yes, Sturridge is worth sacrificing for Hulk.

[Kezza 1,965]

thanks I could read that without my glasses

Would it help if everyone posted in size 20 capitals?

[zolayes 14,489]

Would it help if everyone posted in size 20 capitals?

48 AND BOLD PLEASE

[YouNameIt 1,511]

lmao, another closed minded person xD, i'll leave you to get furious as there really is no point having a debate with people like you. . Have fun lad.

Torres will prove you wrong .

Closed minded? If you really think that Torres will reach the form he had in Liverpool, why didnt he already? Why is his first of last touch most of the time HORRIBLE? That isnt because of the passes he gets. Its because he is mentally screwed up

I said TOrres will score more goals, but never be the star we need

[zolayes 14,489]

Closed minded? If you really think that Torres will reach the form he had in Liverpool, why didnt he already? Why is his first of last touch most of the time HORRIBLE? That isnt because of the passes he gets. Its because he is mentally screwed up

I said TOrres will score more goals, but never be the star we need

we shouldnt be reliant on one star or one scorer ,,,There have certainly been signs Torres is on his way back ,, That should be enough

[TorontoChelsea 4,064]

As soon as I saw we were linked with Hulk again this year, I did have my concerns about Sturridge, and whether Hulk arriving would see Danny leaving. The conclusion i've come to is, Sturridge has come out to the media numerous times saying he wishes to play CF rather than RW. If he is spent half the amount of time he spends complaining actually working on his game, he'd be a nailed on starter on the right side. If he wishes to play CF, he is going to be back up to Torres and Hulk, a player who is happy to play on the right, takes his place in the side. I'd say he is forcing himself out of the side, after such a promising start to the season, which is really disappointing. I'd rather have a player happy to be playing in the position he's told to, than someone with a poor attitude, so, in my opinion, yes, Sturridge is worth sacrificing for Hulk.

I find this baffling. Sturridge has never complained publicly. He has said that his preferred position was as a central striker and he'd rather be playing there. He never said "I hate playing RW" or "why do they make me play out of position"?Even when RDM came in and made put him in the midfield which was never going to work, he didn't publicly complain. What is most amazing about this to me is the insane difference between the way fans treat Sturridge and Torres. Torres has publicly complained. Within hours of winning the CL, he was whining. Early in the season, he complained that Chelsea weren't moving the ball quickly enough for him. He sulks when he's on the bench. Yet, fans don't care. Sturridge is young, led us in goals, and fans boo him and say that we should sell him. Torres is our most expensive player and has contributed virtually nothing in a year and a half yet fans sing his name. Yes, I get why Sturridge is frustrating, he is selfish and he has to learn discipline, but he's 22 and was our second best player in the first half of the season. Sturridge scored 5 match winning goals last season. Torres had none. As I said...baffling.

[Kostas 1,468]

It's all because of his name

What's wrong with

As soon as I saw we were linked with Hulk again this year, I did have my concerns about Sturridge, and whether Hulk arriving would see Danny leaving. The conclusion i've come to is, Sturridge has come out to the media numerous times saying he wishes to play CF rather than RW. If he is spent half the amount of time he spends complaining actually working on his game, he'd be a nailed on starter on the right side. If he wishes to play CF, he is going to be back up to Torres and Hulk, a player who is happy to play on the right, takes his place in the side. I'd say he is forcing himself out of the side, after such a promising start to the season, which is really disappointing. I'd rather have a player happy to be playing in the position he's told to, than someone with a poor attitude, so, in my opinion, yes, Sturridge is worth sacrificing for Hulk.

It's not so much the former arguments that I'm stuck to but the current reality.

From the point some are making about him being just a moderate success in a non-top 5 European league to why spend ~40m when we already have 6 (7 with Ramires) players who could play as wide forwards.

[Sheva. 5,373]

I find this baffling. Sturridge has never complained publicly.

He has, and more than once.

Sturridge is young, led us in goals, and fans boo him and say that we should sell him.

Only because of his selfishness.

[Sheva. 5,373]

What's wrong with

It's not the name of a super hero

[Slam Dunk 1,442]

I find this baffling. Sturridge has never complained publicly. He has said that his preferred position was as a central striker and he'd rather be playing there. He never said "I hate playing RW" or "why do they make me play out of position"?Even when RDM came in and made put him in the midfield which was never going to work, he didn't publicly complain. What is most amazing about this to me is the insane difference between the way fans treat Sturridge and Torres. Torres has publicly complained. Within hours of winning the CL, he was whining. Early in the season, he complained that Chelsea weren't moving the ball quickly enough for him. He sulks when he's on the bench. Yet, fans don't care. Sturridge is young, led us in goals, and fans boo him and say that we should sell him. Torres is our most expensive player and has contributed virtually nothing in a year and a half yet fans sing his name. Yes, I get why Sturridge is frustrating, he is selfish and he has to learn discipline, but he's 22 and was our second best player in the first half of the season. Sturridge scored 5 match winning goals last season. Torres had none. As I said...baffling.

I find it baffling that you've deflected my criticisms of Sturridge towards Torres in the first place, but hey-ho.

As I said, Sturridge needs to spend more time working on his game as a winger, which he doesn't seem to do. There was a reason RDM dropped him for the 2nd half of the season, he was a winger still playing with a centre forwards mentality.

It's not so much the former arguments that I'm stuck to but the current reality.

From the point some are making about him being just a moderate success in a non-top 5 European league to why spend ~40m when we already have 6 (7 with Ramires) players who could play as wide forwards.

I agree, it's a lot of money and a big risk, but he's been a long term target of the club even before AVB arrived, and clearly the board sees him fitting into the team. Wide forwards is slightly ambiguous in my opinion, Ramires isn't a forward, Kalou will be leaving, as mentioned we have Sturridge who i've explained my concerns about, and nobody else for the right side. I don't buy the argument of the quality of the league he's playing in, he's succeeded in the Portugese league as far as i'm concerned, he deserves a chance to progress.

[YouNameIt 1,511]

I find it baffling that you've deflected my criticisms of Sturridge towards Torres in the first place, but hey-ho.

As I said, Sturridge needs to spend more time working on his game as a winger, which he doesn't seem to do. There was a reason RDM dropped him for the 2nd half of the season, he was a winger still playing with a centre forwards mentality.

Maybe because naturally he's a CF?