Jump to content

Hulk


thejolta
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I don't know what it is about Hulk but I would love him here.

Power and pace, a direct and more natural fit on the right hand side and a genuine goalscoring threat.

He offers arguably a greater long range goal threat than Lampard and such a threat will scare the shit out of teams sitting back and letting us play in front of them. That in turn will force opponents to step out at times to close down and with the likes of Mata, Oscar and Hazard to make the most of such gaps it gives us a completely alternative option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait people are complaining about us signing Schurrle who is an inverted forward but want Hulk who is the fucking same... my days...

Schurrle

Pacy

Direct

Good dribbler

Hard working

Decent long range shots

Hulk

Pacy

Direct

Good dribbler

Strong

Lazy

Decent long range shots

Not saying any of the two are what we need but they are basically the same player bar maybe Hulks physically strong and Schurrle works harder and they play opposite wings.

I suppose we need someone on the right though, can't stick Oscar there.

If Hulk was available for peanuts then I'd take him possibly but still I think hes been quite shit since going to Russia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait people are complaining about us signing Schurrle who is an inverted forward but want Hulk who is the fucking same... my days...

Schurrle

Pacy

Direct

Good dribbler

Hard working

Decent long range shots

Hulk

Pacy

Direct

Good dribbler

Strong

Lazy

Decent long range shots

Not saying any of the two are what we need but they are basically the same player bar maybe Hulks physically strong and Schurrle works harder and they play opposite wings.

I suppose we need someone on the right though, can't stick Oscar there.

If Hulk was available for peanuts then I'd take him possibly but still I think hes been quite shit since going to Russia.

I think people want Hulk because he's more explosive and more of a direct threat due to his strength... True, he's been shit in Russia..but he's not suited to that sort of league.

As for Schurrle, he's a team player..but he just doesn't get me excited...he's kinda like Bertrand..he'll be a good squad player for our club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what it is about Hulk but I would love him here.

Power and pace, a direct and more natural fit on the right hand side and a genuine goalscoring threat.

He offers arguably a greater long range goal threat than Lampard and such a threat will scare the shit out of teams sitting back and letting us play in front of them. That in turn will force opponents to step out at times to close down and with the likes of Mata, Oscar and Hazard to make the most of such gaps it gives us a completely alternative option.

Wait people are complaining about us signing Schurrle who is an inverted forward but want Hulk who is the fucking same... my days...

Schurrle

Pacy

Direct

Good dribbler

Hard working

Decent long range shots

Hulk

Pacy

Direct

Good dribbler

Strong

Lazy

Decent long range shots

Not saying any of the two are what we need but they are basically the same player bar maybe Hulks physically strong and Schurrle works harder and they play opposite wings.

I suppose we need someone on the right though, can't stick Oscar there.

If Hulk was available for peanuts then I'd take him possibly but still I think hes been quite shit since going to Russia.

His name is Hulk. That helps. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Legends never get the ban, you fool. "He asked to be banned as he wants to focus on his own personal life."

Off: Ha, well it's getting even funnier so I'm guessing you're one of the legends too?

On: I can't even begun to start to discribe how i don't want that so called HULK here! didn't wat him here last summer, and now especially with the last year media fiasco!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A player that adds some size and strength, Yes please. If it's at a decent price though, should be half of what Zenit paid for him. If that's the case why the fuck would Zenit let him go. Some of these rumours just hard to believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now THAT is a Mourinho team.

Evening Standard saying Chelsea will not give Jose the same funds as in 2004, even Mourinho said its not about spending millions but improving the current team. cant see this at all happening, unless we sell Torres, Mikel/Romeu, maybe even Luiz to fund such a crazy team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A player that adds some size and strength, Yes please. If it's at a decent price though, should be half of what Zenit paid for him. If that's the case why the fuck would Zenit let him go. Some of these rumours just hard to believe.

Spot on. I can't see Zenit letting him go for under 40mio€.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Evening Standard saying Chelsea will not give Jose the same funds as in 2004, even Mourinho said its not about spending millions but improving the current team. cant see this at all happening, unless we sell Torres, Mikel/Romeu, maybe even Luiz to fund such a crazy team.

He doesn't need the same funds as he did in 2004 to compete because our current squad has more talent now than it did back then. In 2004 he spent £140m and now we just need a couple of good impact signings to improve our team enough to really challenge for the title.

DDR 10m

Hulk / Sanchez / Di Maria / Schürrle / someone else 20-25m

Cavani 35m + Torres if we're lucky.

That's roughly 80m spent and together with a few sales (Marin, Essien, Bruma, Kakuta?) the net spend wouldn't be too much anymore, would it? Then exclude Malouda, Benayoun, Ferreira and Hilario from the wage bill when they're released and that should cover the wages of all new signings. You saying the club couldn't afford that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He doesn't need the same funds as he did in 2004 to compete because our current squad has more talent now than it did back then. In 2004 he spent £140m and now we just need a couple of good impact signings to improve our team enough to really challenge for the title.

DDR 10m

Hulk / Sanchez / Di Maria / Schürrle / someone else 20-25m

Cavani 35m + Torres if we're lucky.

That's roughly 80m spent and together with a few sales (Marin, Essien, Bruma, Kakuta?) the net spend wouldn't be too much anymore, would it? Then exclude Malouda, Benayoun, Ferreira and Hilario from the wage bill when they're released and that should cover the wages of all new signings. You saying the club couldn't afford that?

De Rossi's wages, Hulk's wages. Cavani's wages ? - 100k, 150k, 150k

Cavani - De Laurentis has said only if 63m is met. Torres has to be sold, and even though we'd want to sell, he may pull a Malouda and decide to stay, havent you seen in recent weeks he keeps on talking about staying till the end of his contract because he knows noone else would pay the wages he's currently on anywhere!

Essien is a Jose favourite, daddy wont sell him. Marin -2/3m? Kakuta/Bruma? haha doubt theyd fetch much, we arent exactly Porto at selling so we doubt we'd make much there.

Malouda, Benayoun, Ferreira, Hilario compared to the wages of the Cavani,Rossi,Hulk ...would cover a fraction.

Personally, De Rossi and Hulk we can afford, not all 3 (unless we're giving f**k all about FFP)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You