Rumoured Paul Pogba

[OneMoSalah 8,785]

Torres is worth -20m, getting his wage off the book for the next two years is hellva deal. pls i would sell Torres+Ramires+Lukaku for Pogba+10 million in a heartbeat. But unfortunately deals like that are too complicated and doesn't happen in reality.

Are you being serious?

I know it is not that late in Scotland. He is saying Juve will give us 10m. Secondly "what is the point of giving 3 players for one player?' Quality>quantity,simple because Pogba is a much better asset and rarity. Pogba is a direct replacement for Ramires, he is a tremendous upgrade. I look at losing Torres wages, as an amazing coupe in this scenario. Even with Lukaku poor showing at the world cup, he is the only piece that sucks losing.

I am actually kinda confused by your reaction. It is like saying what is the point of selling 3 Honda (insert models) for a Rolls Royce.

Yeah but if we gave 3 players for 1 then sure Pogba will play where Ramires did but then we have to go and replace 2 other strikers (and maybe even buy another CM because who knows if Cesc will play deeper or a bit further up) when one of them is 21, nearly has 50 PL goals in 2 seasons and will be a very very good player in a few years. Sure Torres wages would be nice to get rid of but squads win you titles, not 11 or 18 players but 25 players, just imagine the injuries/supsensions we could end up with, I'd rather have a really strong squad than the best 11 in the league and a shit bench and depth. Anyway I couldn't see Mourinho getting rid of 3 players (where hes already said 2 of them are gonna be staying next year) to bring one player.

Also the 10M thing, I read it wrong.

[Joker10 946]

Yeah but if we gave 3 players for 1 then sure Pogba will play where Ramires did but then we have to go and replace 2 other strikers (and maybe even buy another CM because who knows if Cesc will play deeper or a bit further up) when one of them is 21, nearly has 50 PL goals in 2 seasons and will be a very very good player in a few years. Sure Torres wages would be nice to get rid of but squads win you titles, not 11 or 18 players but 25 players, just imagine the injuries/supsensions we could end up with, I'd rather have a really strong squad than the best 11 in the league and a shit bench and depth. Anyway I couldn't see Mourinho getting rid of 3 players (where hes already said 2 of them are gonna be staying next year) to bring one player.

Also the 10M thing, I read it wrong.

That i 100% agree with you. This deal will never happen in reality but it doesn't mean it wouldn't be beneficial.

Signing another striker is not going to be an issue to replace Torres or Lukaku departure, we are always capable of that.

[Viper22 2,418]

I like the idea - it just wouldn't happen sadly

Don't worry about being flamed - some people can't think outside the box

I guess if you follow MLB you see these types of deal being done - just hasn't caught on in Football yet

I wasn't saying it would happen. Just got a bit carried away and was stating my ideal scenario.

[Viper22 2,418]

Yeah but I am talking about we would be given them 3 players we paid £88M for plus another £10M for ONE player if that sort of deal happened.

What the fuck is the point in that? Sure Torres isn't great, Ramires had a bad half a season and Lukaku isn't exactly excelling at the World Cup but still cmon what would be the point in giving them 3 players and money to get one player????

POGBA + £10M TO US. Why have you not got that yet? Go back and read my other posts again. We're signing a striker so selling Lukaku and Torres would leave us with the new striker (Costa?), Ba and Bamford/Drogba as our 3 strikers (we're overqualified in that position) and then we'd lose Ramires and gain Pogba, CM for CM.

[YouNameIt 1,511]

Explain why then, rather than tossing a random insult. Torres is worth £10M. Ramires is worth £20M. Lukaku is worth £20M. That's £50M all together so I'm valuing Pogba at a generous £40M. Juventus have been interested in all 3 of the players over the last year, and we're definitely interested in Pogba. Please explain.

Do I even have to fucking explain? I highlighted the part which I think is the most stuipid thing Ive read here.

You think we should get rid of lukaku because "he cannot score against algeria."

Plus even thinking swapping 3 players for one is laughable. This isnt FIFA...its reality so be realistic.

[iseah100 5,612]

Do I even have to fucking explain? I highlighted the part which I think is the most stuipid thing Ive read here.

You think we should get rid of lukaku because "he cannot score against algeria."

Plus even thinking swapping 3 players for one is laughable. This isnt FIFA...its reality so be realistic.

Took it too far, bro, too far. Chill.

[Spike 12,049]

Nothing personal, but that is one of the most retarded things Ive ever read here.

Nothing personal, but you really should stop insulting members like that.

[The only place to be 11,313]

Do I even have to fucking explain? I highlighted the part which I think is the most stuipid thing Ive read here.

You think we should get rid of lukaku because "he cannot score against algeria."

Plus even thinking swapping 3 players for one is laughable. This isnt FIFA...its reality so be realistic.

Oh look, using the word 'retard' again (before the edit).

http://thesaurus.com/

You're welcome.

[Special Juan 27,439]

I'll just leave this here, please adhere to it.

http://forum.talkchelsea.net/topic/18229-derailing-of-threads-and-constant-bickering/#entry915345

[Viper22 2,418]

Do I even have to fucking explain? I highlighted the part which I think is the most stuipid thing Ive read here.

You think we should get rid of lukaku because "he cannot score against algeria."

Plus even thinking swapping 3 players for one is laughable. This isnt FIFA...its reality so be realistic.

We obviously have a pretty massive difference of opinion. So I think we're just going to have to agree to disagree.

[RoyalBlues 4,050]

[Ryan Fong 2,776]

Do I even have to fucking explain? I highlighted the part which I think is the most stuipid thing Ive read here.

You think we should get rid of lukaku because "he cannot score against algeria."

Plus even thinking swapping 3 players for one is laughable. This isnt FIFA...its reality so be realistic.

Whether his opinion is legit or not why you always act like a dick? I'm surprised you're still around while you constantly attack people personally.

[didierforever 7,349]

Pogba for rambo and lukaku and torres. Not sure if are buying pogba or a combo player of zidane, pele and beckenbauer in one player.

I would rather take my chances with cesc, matic, rambo, mvg.

[MrBlueGuy 1,552]

Apparently he is worth 60-70m hahahahahahha missed 2 sitters against Ecuador. Show how overpriced he is-30-40m max for him.

[DanishBlue 426]

He is worth around 50m imo. He is already worldclass and he has a lot of years to give and should even improve a lot. I would love him here even though we were to pay a lot to get him.

[Toli 977]

Apparently he is worth 60-70m hahahahahahha missed 2 sitters against Ecuador. Show how overpriced he is-30-40m max for him.

so if Messi or Ronaldo miss 2 sitters in one game, their market value decreases by 30-40 million, according to your genius formula?

[Parky 739]

To me this guy is a beast and has it all for a to be a top class midfielder. Progba and Matic would be scary partnership..

[Amin Sarmadi 24]

EXCLUSIVE From Goal.com

http://www.goal.com/en/news/11/transfer-zone/2014/06/27/4917888/chelsea-step-up-pogba-pursuit?ICID=HP_BN_2

Chelsea are stepping up their pursuit of Paul Pogba by preparing to offer him the most lucrative contract in their history, Goal understands.

The Londoners are putting together what sources say is a "staggering" package to entice the French sensation to Stamford Bridge this summer.