Frank Lampard

[Atlas Lion 1,223]

I doubt this.....

Frank probably did get a contract, just not what he wanted.... This isnt 2009 or 10, where he took chelsea for hostage and got that huge contract deal using Jose and Inter.

Multiple sources claimed there was no fresh deal and he was released. Mourinho has said something completely different. That is the only issue i'm bringing up.

you refuse to recogonise the TRUTH ,,, CITY have admitted it has all been lies ... go bury your head in the sand BUT Don't

claim to be rational .....

Questioning and postponing judgement on matters that haven't been fully revealed is the definition of rationality. Not questioning someones affiliation towards a club by the picture of their avatar.

Lampard doesn't owe us anything. Only thing he does is an honest approach and that is the only thing i'm upset about.

[Term-X 7,891]

Lampard doesn't owe us anything. Only thing he does is an honest approach and that is the only thing i'm upset about.

It's not a case of 'owing' anything, it's a case of having class and a moral compass, something he has marketed himself as having.

Chelsea's Del Piero, Totti and Gerrard all rolled into one moved directly to our only title rival, that's unforgivable. The lie just shows how aware he was that it could damage his image, which shows he understands what it all means after the badge pissing, telling us he loves the club, saying he wouldn't join 'or play' against us for another English side. The fans turned a blind eye to the AVB situation, clearly after that he took us for fools.

[CMS 382]

'I had sat down with Ferran (Soriano, the chief executive of both clubs) and it was all about New York. There was no mention of Man City. If they had wanted to speak to me on behalf of Man City, with New York in the pipeline beyond that, because I was a free agent, but that was never the question at all.

'To be honest when I thought about five or six months off, I thought it was quite a result. I thought I've been playing solid for a long, long time. It will be a good break. I'll find a way to keep fit. I thought I maybe could train with Chelsea.'

'In a million years I wouldn't celebrate if I scored against Chelsea. I used to celebrate when I scored against West Ham, but that was a different situation. When I left West Ham there was a hostility from me towards them over certain things - old new now. But with Chelsea? Never.

'I swear to God, if I went to the Bridge and they booed me for 90 minutes and I scored the winner, I still wouldn't celebrate. It would never come into my head and I think the fans there understand me and how I feel about it. I would never celebrate against Chelsea. That would be ridiculous.'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2904229/Frank-Lampard-insists-never-intended-play-Premier-League-club-wouldn-t-celebrate-scoring-Chelsea-booed-90-minutes.html

I can't beleive the arrogance of this guy. He thinks he's going to come in to SB and score the winner against us. Like this time Chelsea players are going to path way for him like the coming of Moses through the red sea. Talk about being delusional. We are not going to be fooled twice. I'm sure Chelsea players and Jose will be ready for him.

[Kevins79 17]

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/jan/10/frank-lampard-signs-mls-deal-new-york-city-fc-july

[CHOULO19 24,332]

Mourinho's said that we offered him a new contract, Frank said we didn't. Who's lying? There's no concrete evidence at all in that statement.

Jose said on more than one occasion that Frank was offered a new contract, he even said that he can return in any position he wants.

Then you have Neil Ashton, who is the closest journalist to Frank, and who was basically his wing man in the AVB debacle and the 2013 contract extension saga, said back in February 2014 that Frank was indeed offered a new contract on reduced wages.

If rumors are to be believed, Frank is now on a higher wage than he ever was at Chelsea. Probably why he went to City and not one of the other offers outside of the country that were available for him.

[CurlyHairLikeLuiz 1,625]

It is real sad to see the hatred towards Lampard now. It is understandable but if we end up winning the league this season which I reckon we will do I won't really care about Lampard playing for City. He won everything at us, broke bagful of records and is really one of a kind. No 1 year deal to a team who needs our legend to help them is going to bother me. I will remember the years where he helped us to glory. Best moment was the Bolton game when he scored the double at Reebok to gift us the title.

Everyone has their opinions and I can't begrudge people for having a change of opinion of him but he is still a legend in my eyes. As long as we lift the title I will just forget that he ever played for them.

I think that's pretty much my stance on it after calming down.

As long as we win the league I really could care less. I hope that one day we can welcome him back here for a coaching role...

He certainly didn't help himself, though.

[CHOULO19 24,332]

Apparently, City are getting investigated by UEFA because of it: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2904903/Manchester-City-face-new-cash-probe-network-global-companies-sharing-financial-losses.html

[MichaelDance 552]

Apparently, City are getting investigated by UEFA because of it: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2904903/Manchester-City-face-new-cash-probe-network-global-companies-sharing-financial-losses.html

Good finally a investigation because in my eyes, they are avoiding the FFP and if we did the same thing we would be all over the media, and a fine. I bet any money on it.

Their owner looks like a right gimp, so glad Roman owns us.

[tiby2979 175]

Mourinho's said that we offered him a new contract, Frank said we didn't. Who's lying? There's no concrete evidence at all in that statement.

The problem here is not that Mourinho lied but rather the sentences are taken out of context and do not read the full statements:

"They were offered new deals. We were in this process until the end, but you arrive into a moment where you ask what’s the best for the team? What’s the best for the other players? What’s the best for them? And it depends also on their mentality."

Mourinho said he was offered a new contract, but in those same statements he also said the club had to think about what was best for the team. My theory is that is that not yet reached an agreement and the club decided to withdraw the offer of renewal. So both statements had make sense.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2629621/Frank-Lampards-Chelsea-future-balance-talks-threaten-break-down.html

[yipo 56]

Apparently, City are getting investigated by UEFA because of it: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2904903/Manchester-City-face-new-cash-probe-network-global-companies-sharing-financial-losses.html

hope mancity get point deduction

[Spike 12,049]

Not much to say anymore. The writing is one the wall. I don't hate the bloke, but I can't say I"m not disappointed. I'm still a huge fan and supporter of the player I got to watch for so many years, but I'm not sure if I'm a fan of the man himself.

[Ze Mario 638]

Seeing these guys on chelsea shirt is like a girl who sucked stinky smell **ck on her mouth and got oversize **ck load onto her butt hole at the same time

[Sidzeret 2,257]

Weird to see all the Lampards hating. But there no way a club legend can justify his actions when he manipulated and cheated a whole lot of people.

Now, everyone knows who their favourite player is- John Terry.

[BleedsBlue 1,549]

I still believe we could have given him a one year extension. This whole City situation is happening because he wanted to play another year and we just did not offer him that. Say what you want but that is kind of messed up from our side as well.

We could have really used him in the squad this season. He would have been the perfect squad player for us( same role he has at City.) Also I am sure it must have hurt him to see the club re-sign Drogba but not extend his contract. I would not say he took revenge but maybe just felt a little disrespected. Lampard and I think most of us here knew that he still had a season left in him and instead of sacrificing that away, he chose to continue playing.

He could have gone to another league like Cole but perhaps a change of league was not worth it for him.

[CHOULO19 24,332]

I still believe we could have given him a one year extension. This whole City situation is happening because he wanted to play another year and we just did not offer him that. Say what you want but that is kind of messed up from our side as well.

We could have really used him in the squad this season. He would have been the perfect squad player for us( same role he has at City.) Also I am sure it must have hurt him to see the club re-sign Drogba but not extend his contract. I would not say he took revenge but maybe just felt a little disrespected. Lampard and I think most of us here knew that he still had a season left in him and instead of sacrificing that away, he chose to continue playing.

He could have gone to another league like Cole but perhaps a change of league was not worth it for him.

That's not true, or at the very least there is no proof for that. There is some inconclusive proof that we did offer him a contract as Jose said and some reports claimed in Feb-March of last year, but there is zero proof, to my knowledge, that he was not offered a new contract. Not even Frank himself has come out and explicitly said that he was not offered a new contract.

[RoyalBlues 4,050]

Not much to say anymore. The writing is one the wall. I don't hate the bloke, but I can't say I"m not disappointed. I'm still a huge fan and supporter of the player I got to watch for so many years, but I'm not sure if I'm a fan of the man himself.

It is very hard at this moment. But if we won the PL this season and then Lampard no longer at City somehow, I think some will get 'softer' toward him.

[BlueLion. 21,491]

One of the players in this picture is someone who gave their all to Chelsea even when things didn't go well.

The other is Frank Lampard.

Already it seems such a long time ago since these two were wearing the #8 and #9 though.

[BleedsBlue 1,549]

That's not true, or at the very least there is no proof for that. There is some inconclusive proof that we did offer him a contract as Jose said and some reports claimed in Feb-March of last year, but there is zero proof, to my knowledge, that he was not offered a new contract. Not even Frank himself has come out and explicitly said that he was not offered a new contract.

Honestly we might never know but I highly doubt he would reject an extension because clearly he wanted to play another season in the premier league.

According to me-

We did not offer him an extension and he chose to go to the MLS but later changed his mind when he got to know about Drogba's return.