didierforever 7,349 Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 Don't think lamps will do that!!!! He is a proper chels!!! sdrcfc 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hjperdeath 2,226 Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 Villa was sent on loan to Melbourne. The only reason why Lampard is going to City is to piss Chelsea off. Saying that though, with the squad that City have, will he even play?You've got that analogy wrong I think. Villa isn't English, so he won't help City in the HG quota while Lampard will. If Villa was English, he'd probably be at City too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChelseaFC12 134 Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 What the hell Frank... Simply unimaginable.. MichaelDance 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pWneR 230 Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 BBC reporting it too. Now I kinda have empathy for arsenal fans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,571 Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 Frank Lampard: Man City set to sign ex-Chelsea player on loan http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/28616101 Hope He will not play against us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thendo 1,088 Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 To me Lamps will always be remembered as the legend he has been for us, all the memorable moments he has given us. But this city loan deal leaves kind of a bad taste in my mouth, seeing how he will join them, wear their jersey and contribute to them fighting us for the title... Term-X 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thendo 1,088 Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 Dp. nyikolajevics and MichaelDance 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rambo 1,729 Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 Just hope JT never does anything like this, a 'proper' chelsea ambassador. He'd be thinking of the fans, and how we'd react.I can't see JT doing that, even the likes of Drogba and Ash would rather leave to another country than play for another PL club. Not so sure the level of involvement Lamps has got to do with this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pacquiao 1,834 Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 Good luck to him. It makes sense why he would go therenot really, only reason why he would go there is because they have forced him to sign for them. Which is simply embarrassing. MichaelDance 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndersonBLUE 819 Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 Don't really see the big deal. Man City own that club and Frank would want to stay fit till March. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pacquiao 1,834 Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 Don't really see the big deal. Man City own that club and Frank would want to stay fit till March.would you still not see it as a big deal if throughout the season we are neck and neck with City and in Lampard's last game for them in march he scores a last minute winner for them to move above us which results in City winning the league by a point which then results in Jose getting sacked! of course the chances of that actually happening are slim but while he is there its possible! so to see no big deal in Lampard playing for a title rival is bizarre to me.. MichaelDance and Term-X 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichaelDance 552 Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 not really, only reason why he would go there is because they have forced him to sign for them. Which is simply embarrassing.Maybe they hid something in the contract... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! Spike 12,049 Posted August 2, 2014 Popular Post! Share Posted August 2, 2014 This is depressing. He doesn't need to do this. He just doesn't. kellzfresh, Amblève., MichaelDance and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichaelDance 552 Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 Don't really see the big deal. Man City own that club and Frank would want to stay fit till March.Would you be saying that if Utd owned the international clubs and he returned to the PL with them and Man utd won the season because of our legend's goals? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
different level 1,056 Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 I would be crushed if the move goes through, but we have no one to blame but ourselves. The club released him and the signed Cesc as his replacement - a player Frank can't stand and even I'm still learning not to cringe everytime I see his face. Everyone agreed it was the best thing for us, that we have to move on even though we're replacing probably our greatest ever player with someone we've hated for years. You know, before anything else football is a business. Then again how could we ask from Lamps not to consider his best career options for whatever reason, it'd be totally hypocritical of us.On another note, while it sucks he could play for another EPL team I guess it could be much worse. To be honest I don't really hate City, just kinda recognize their existence in the title picture in what I could describe as a non-personal rivalry for the EPL title, strictly business. Just imagine him in the red of United, Arsenal or God forbid Liverpool Fulham Broadway and zolayes 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! Fulham Broadway 17,314 Posted August 2, 2014 Popular Post! Share Posted August 2, 2014 So he scores a match winner 'elsewhere', which takes City top of the table... that's not on par?He could be eligible for a PL winners medal if City win the title.True, but conversely he could score a couple that helps us against United or the bindippers.He will want to prove a point to our board, 'look I still have it' but at the end of the day they didnt want to give him a new contract. Nothing can take away his contribution over the years though. The only place to be, DYC., TorontoChelsea and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndersonBLUE 819 Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 would you still not see it as a big deal if throughout the season we are neck and neck with City and in Lampard's last game for them in march he scores a last minute winner for them to move above us which results in City winning the league by a point which then results in Jose getting sacked! of course the chances of that actually happening are slim but while he is there its possible! so to see no big deal in Lampard playing for a title rival is bizarre to me..It's only a short term loan, I doubt he will make many appearences for a team like CityWould you be saying that if Utd owned the international clubs and he returned to the PL with them and Man utd won the season because of our legend's goals?Ifs and buts...Honestly, this isn't that bad as people make out to be. zolayes 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanicus 5,208 Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 To be honest, I don't think he actually had any choice. NYC is City's sister club so they probably politely forced his loan to Manchester. I don't think he will be an important player for them or contribute much, it's just a City trying to show their muscles and saying 'fuck you, we bought your legend' to Chelsea. It's just a cheap trick.Everyone does those psychological tricks. Mourinho tried to unsettle Shaw saying that he doesn't think any teenager is worth that amount of money and that it's not fair for senior players to pay this ammount of wages to young guy.The most important thing is that we are not butthurt by it, keep our heads cool, calm & collected, ingore any distraction (yes, this is a distraction) and focus on winning the league.And Lampard will always be our legend, no matter what. Fernando, zolayes, The only place to be and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! The only place to be 11,313 Posted August 2, 2014 Popular Post! Share Posted August 2, 2014 In a sense it's a reminder of how lucky we are. Arsenal have the prospect of a 27 year old Fabregas playing against them, whereas we face legends when they're 35/36. Liverpool lose Suarez, Spurs lose Bale, but we don't tend to lose players in their prime if we still want them. Tomo, Cosmin, Liquidator and 9 others 12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chelsea blue 615 Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 I think he justs wants to be closer to home to see his kids and his girfriend and he wont be playing that many games anyway it could have been worse and he went to S***S The only place to be 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.