test

Welcome to Talk Chelsea

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Fulham Broadway

The Mourinho Thread

Started by Fulham Broadway,

.

pat nevin said it.

and today courtois said this "I didn't have a problem with the manager. You'd have to ask the other players about them" #cfc @bbc5live

why would a player even say something like this unless there were some major major problems.

just one thing, were the tactics different today? was the formation different. jose's selection, tactics, negativity has cost us massively. his transfers have been hopeless to say the least and his youth handling has been disastorous. but just look at the players. look at their effort or lack of it. their attitude, has been far worse than any of it

Change in manager lifts the application at any level

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Change in manager lifts the application at any level

application - yes, after a certain amount of time. not 2 days later. even holland is not stupid enough to change the tactics, one day before the match.

effort - it should not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jose is no saint

Let's not forget what he did at Madrid. He even treated a club legend Casillas pretty badly. He's a bit over emotional and can cause a lot of shit. Yeah, he's entertaining but it comes at a price

Alex Ferguson would never allow players to get an attitude and think they are bigger than the club. Ferguson may have had the backing of the entire club but I'm sure Jose could have handled things better

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

application - yes, after a certain amount of time. not 2 days later. even holland is not stupid enough to change the tactics, one day before the match.

effort - it should not.

He isn't stupid enough to stick with the tactics that got us 16th , we played with far more freedom , and it helped immensely
Stats, zolayes and Starman60 like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jose is no saint

Let's not forget what he did at Madrid. He even treated a club legend Casillas pretty badly. He's a bit over emotional and can cause a lot of shit. Yeah, he's entertaining but it comes at a price

Alex Ferguson would never allow players to get an attitude and think they are bigger than the club. Ferguson may have had the backing of the entire club but I'm sure Jose could have handled things better

Let Throw a shoe on a Player!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He isn't stupid enough to stick with the tactics that got us 16th , we played with far more freedom , and it helped immensely

i think we played with a lot of intensity. we pressed high up. we moved the ball well. costa stayed in the box. all of these things jose has been asking for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the point that i want to prove is that the players actually and intentionally screwed the club because of their problems with jose.

it is not the point of players just "not playing well", its the point of players intentionally not pplaying well. and there is a massive difference in them.

i know jose is gone, and i would have been happier if it was sooner. now we have no chance of making top4, forget winning the league.

as for getting us the title last year, jose got us the title too. if he is fired, so should the players be. as for not getting players cos we have no buying power, well, i ll be happy with watching players who actually give a crap about the club, rather than players who clearly who give us to the dogs, if things did not go their way.

That's the thing, you can't prove it, we can only speculate which will do the club/players more bad than good. The only way we will now is if in the future somebody open their mouths about it.

Throwing players under the bus while we don't know if they are actually involved in anything and what they actually did is the lowest of the lowest

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the thing, you can't prove it, we can only speculate which will do the club/players more bad than good. The only way we will now is if in the future somebody open their mouths about it.

Throwing players under the bus while we don't know if they are actually involved in anything and what they actually did is the lowest of the lowest

so every time the players have a problem with the manager, they can put in half arsed performances, get him sacked and since we cant "prove" anything in the court of law, we should sit by seeing them screwing the club over and over again?

Johnnyeye and MichaelDance like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so every time the players have a problem with the manager, they can put in half arsed performances, get him sacked and since we cant "prove" anything in the court of law, we should sit by seeing them screwing the club over and over again?

whilst there are people paying £30+ and season tickets to water down to the stupid owner and the board.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i think we played with a lot of intensity. we pressed high up. we moved the ball well. costa stayed in the box. all of these things jose has been asking for.

What intensity? What pressing? Sunderland barely touched the ball and often played the ball long when they got it. It was all Chelsea hogging the ball.

They were terrible. They did not press and gave Chelsea all the space they wanted. No double marking, no two banks of four tightly packed in front of goal, no aggression, no intentional fouls. Just a disjointed mess after conceding two goals so quickly.

That was a walk in the park. The performance vs Porto was more impressive. But I guess that doesn't count.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so every time the players have a problem with the manager, they can put in half arsed performances, get him sacked and since we cant "prove" anything in the court of law, we should sit by seeing them screwing the club over and over again?

Who determines whether someone is putting in a half arse performance or just out of form,lacking in confidence,motivation?

Costa today was still pretty shit despite the departure of Mou, maybe he is just horribly out of form and low on confidence and not intentionally trying to fuck things up

That is a basic value of every decent society, that you cant blame people on assumptions and i'm glad people in charge are smart enough not to do this as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And on the flip side to that, ae you suggesting that every time a manager leads his team to the relegation zone, the club should absolve him of any blame and sign 22 new players?

Got it.

http://forum.talkchelsea.net/topic/20662-the-mourinho-thread/?p=1189015

people should either know the whole context and what a poster stands on, or simply not get into a discussion. simple/

Essien19 likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who determines whether someone is putting in a half arse performance in or just out of form,lacking in confidence,motivation?

Costa today was still pretty shit despite the departure of Mou, maybe he is just horribly out of form and low on confidence and not intentionally trying to fuck things up

That is a basic value of every decent society, that you cant blame people on assumptions and i'm glad people in charge are smart enough not to do this as well.

if you cant understand the difference in an out of form performance and a cesc/costa performance, then i honestly have nothing to say.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What intensity? What pressing? Sunderland barely touched the ball and often played the ball long when they got it. It was all Chelsea hogging the ball.

They were terrible. They did not press and gave Chelsea all the space they wanted. No double marking, no two banks of four tightly packed in front of goal, no aggression, no intentional fouls. Just a disjointed mess after conceding two goals so quickly.

That was a walk in the park. The performance vs Porto was more impressive. But I guess that doesn't count.

the intensity and pressing we showed from the starting whistle. in the 2nd half when we actually dropped off a little, sunderland were slicing us open when the wished.

how many times this season have we started matches looking like zombies. sunderland were getting forced to go long in the first half.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.

pat nevin said it.

and today courtois said this "I didn't have a problem with the manager. You'd have to ask the other players about them" #cfc @bbc5live

why would a player even say something like this unless there were some major major problems.

just one thing, were the tactics different today? was the formation different. jose's selection, tactics, negativity has cost us massively. his transfers have been hopeless to say the least and his youth handling has been disastorous. but just look at the players. look at their effort or lack of it. their attitude, has been far worse than any of it

Not sure about the transfers, if it wasn't for Mourinho we wouldn't have Pedro... he made the phone call and got his name to the signature. He's not been his best but he has an excuse, he's not used to the club, how we play and he didn't get much game time in Barcelona.

And he scored today....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.