Edinson Cavani

[ulsterchelsea 3,221]

Again tho, this could just be about starting a bidding war assuming of course we are not going straight in at 63

[Kunkka 19]

Take him a BEAST

[Barbara 15,149]

  On 06/06/2013 at 16:35, calculatingInfinity said:

It is on their official twitter

https://twitter.com/sscnapoli/status/342674497373106176

I mean the source, not the twitter itself.

There are tons of rumors about Chelsea and Mou these days

[Severinb 309]

He also said on the napoli homepage that any team interested has to pay the 63mil release clause!

[Bosnian Blue 2,471]

63M is too much. I'd rather not.

[Billy. 2,742]

Fuck it pay the money we need him simple as that lol

[Rmpr 8,977]

51mi, just so Torres doesnt become our all time most expensive transfer!

[Super-Mario 74]

Would rather have Gomez for 20 million Euros than to pay 63 for Edinson....

[JDY 1,290]

£35m + Torres

You know you want it Rafa

[ulsterchelsea 3,221]

The talk chelsea accountancy team out again I see

[The Skipper 20,593]

Please be true.

[lucio 5,418]

  On 06/06/2013 at 16:52, JDY said:

£35m + Torres

You know you want it Rafa

torres went over 1000minutes without scoring a league goal for the waiter. i doubt he wants him that badly

[ChelseaFanUK 1,014]

Fuckin mental how people can claim 63m euros for cavani is too much when people like Fernandinho move for £34m. It's the way the market is, and is going to stay, the first £100m transfer isnt far away

[BenIsLegend 475]

  On 06/06/2013 at 16:35, calculatingInfinity said:

It is on their official twitter

https://twitter.com/sscnapoli/status/342674497373106176

The fact it's on their official twitter makes me think its just a ploy to start a bidding war :/

[GermanBlue 82]

Who'd pay that 63m though? Even City will think about this.

[nadavTKL 1,787]

  On 06/06/2013 at 17:02, ChelseaFanUK said:

Fuckin mental how people can claim 63m euros for cavani is too much when people like Fernandinho move for £34m. It's the way the market is, and is going to stay, the first £100m transfer isnt far away

Fernandinho cost for City 22m. It was a mistake by Sky Sports, they included his wages for five years (12m).

[laeth 527]

  On 06/06/2013 at 17:16, nadavTKL said:

Fernandinho cost for City 22m. It was a mistake by Sky Sports, they included his wages for five years (12m).

This is what it says on the Shaktar website:

  Quote

On 6 June, FC Shakhtar and Manchester City reached an agreement regarding the transfer of the Pitmen’s midfielder Fernandinho to the English club. The Citizens signed the Brazilian for 40 million euros.

Could mean either really.

[nadavTKL 1,787]

  On 06/06/2013 at 17:18, laeth said:

This is what it says on the Shaktar website:

Could mean either really.

  On 06/06/2013 at 17:18, laeth said:

This is what it says on the Shaktar website:

Could mean either really.

I dont know about that, i do know that a few minutes after Sky Sports came with this 34m thing, many reliable twitter accounts explained its not what City paid for Shaktar.