Edinson Cavani

[bushman 2,043]

then I am confused about what part of our discussion could be considered unrealistic. Hmmm. Well to each to his own. LOL.

If you take your time & read attentively all our chats here, you might even come to a great revelation.

It really makes no difference anyway.

The bottom line for me. Cavani is too overpriced. One fine player but not for 50m or even much more.

PSG do not need to sell him & certainly not for the same price as they paid for him.

[didierforever 7,349]

If you take your time & read attentively all our chats here, you might even come to a great revelation.

It really makes no difference anyway.

The bottom line for me. Cavani is too overpriced. One fine player but not for 50m or even much more.

PSG do not need to sell him & certainly not for the same price as they paid for him.

so that is your opinion. Let me enlighten u here a little. What u think is not the word of god. U THINK cavani is overpriced but that does not in anyway make it our getting cavani or what I have said UNREALISTIC. I have only continued what the tabloids have said about cavani and hence if u want to argue the realism of cavani's sale for psg, do it with the various english tabloids. Not with me. Get it!!!!

[Beepu 1,714]

It´s SPECULATE btw.

I appreciate your view, but somehow, it´s unrealistic. Despite of it, keep speculating.

Since you have your opinion, I have mine. We all are entitled to an opinion, aren´t we ?

Dude, chill. Check where c and x are on the keyboard, its a common typo. Why you gotta be all up in his grill?

[bushman 2,043]

so that is your opinion. Let me enlighten u here a little. What u think is not the word of god. U THINK cavani is overpriced but that does not in anyway make it our getting cavani or what I have said UNREALISTIC. I have only continued what the tabloids have said about cavani and hence if u want to argue the realism of cavani's sale for psg, do it with the various english tabloids. Not with me. Get it!!!!

Not here to argue at all. Just do not agree with your unrealistic expectations, that´s all.

[bushman 2,043]

Dude, chill. Check where c and x are on the keyboard, its a common typo. Why you gotta be all up in his grill?

Didie prefers well grilled steak, don´t you ? Lol.

[kellzfresh 7,229]

Lol

[bushman 2,043]

Lol

If I may ?

Do you honestly think PSG would be so stupid & sell Cavani for 50m as they paid for him ?

That´s unrealistic to me.

[BlueLion. 21,491]

If I may ?

Do you honestly think PSG would be so stupid & sell Cavani for 50m as they paid for him ?

That´s unrealistic to me.

I do. Because, let's be fair, Zlatan is top dog at PSG. Cavani may have 20 goals in 30 games this season, but he hasn't played as well as those statistics infer. Many of his performances have been lacklustre, and he certainly isn't performing as well as did for Napoli for so many years. He hasn't set the world on fire. I wouldn't say he is a failed investment by any means, but if PSG can recoup and thus reinvest in a position where they need more quality, I can't see why not.

[bushman 2,043]

I do. Because, let's be fair, Zlatan is top dog at PSG. Cavani may have 20 goals in 30 games this season, but he hasn't played as well as those statistics infer. Many of his performances have been lacklustre, and he certainly isn't performing as well as did for Napoli for so many years. He hasn't set the world on fire. I wouldn't say he is a failed investment by any means, but if PSG can recoup and thus reinvest in a position where they need more quality, I can't see why not.

I never said Cavani would be a failed investment. My question is very simple. Why would PSG sell him for what they paid for ?

As we both know, PSG is not short on money. Investment made, profit is expected. That´s all.

[Special Juan 27,530]

I never said Cavani would be a failed investment. My question is very simple. Why would PSG sell him for what they paid for ?

As we both know, PSG is not short on money. Investment made, profit is expected. That´s all.

"Investment made, profit is expected. That´s all."

We should ask for 100M for Torres.

[bushman 2,043]

"Investment made, profit is expected. That´s all."

We should ask for 100M for Torres.

Ferda is shut, Cavani is the top. A big difference. Mata, KDB were sold for profit, remember ?

[Special Juan 27,530]

Ferda is shut, Cavani is the top. A big difference. Mata, KDB were sold for profit, remember ?

It was a tongue in cheek comment, take your y-fronts off your head.

[bushman 2,043]

It was a tongue in cheek comment, take your y-fronts off your head.

As posted = the truth.

[BlueLion. 21,491]

I never said Cavani would be a failed investment. My question is very simple. Why would PSG sell him for what they paid for ?

As we both know, PSG is not short on money. Investment made, profit is expected. That´s all.

I never said you did...

Exactly, PSG is not short on money. So you have answered your own question as to why they'd sell him.

[bushman 2,043]

I never said you did...

Exactly, PSG is not short on money. So you have answered your own question as to why they'd sell him.

No matter how much I tried to answer that question, it still works out as no sale or much more than 50m paid for him.

To me, Costa is affordable for Jose to buy & Atletico needs money, but PSG buys players & rarely ever sell them.

[Mohammed Seif 1,451]

No matter how much I tried to answer that question, it still works out as no sale or much more than 50m paid for him.

To me, Costa is affordable for Jose to buy & Atletico needs money, but PSG buys players & rarely ever sell them.

I agree Costa would be a GREAT addition.

[Sheva. 5,373]

I do. Because, let's be fair, Zlatan is top dog at PSG. Cavani may have 20 goals in 30 games this season, but he hasn't played as well as those statistics infer. Many of his performances have been lacklustre, and he certainly isn't performing as well as did for Napoli for so many years. He hasn't set the world on fire. I wouldn't say he is a failed investment by any means, but if PSG can recoup and thus reinvest in a position where they need more quality, I can't see why not.

Zlatan won't carry on like this forever, then they will have to spend another 50m to get a replacement?

If we really wanted Cavani, we could have gotten him last summer, but instead we were fucking around with Man utd.

[bushman 2,043]

Zlatan won't carry on like this forever, then they will have to spend another 50m to get a replacement?

If we really wanted Cavani, we could have gotten him last summer, but instead we were fucking around with Man utd.

Exactly my point. Cavani was available for 50m then. Now, only a naive person may believe PSG is going to sell him for 50m.