jmarlow 458 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Inspired genius.try reading the whole post eh! and not just my first reaction when reading yours! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spike 12,049 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 my word! smhfirst of all! how is that arrogant saying moving from Lille in the French league to the European Champions in the PL is a step up? please do explain.To say Hazard wont track back is just ridiculous! and its not even a big issue anyway! if Hazard will refuse to track back as you seem to think then Mata will do it then!and then to say you wont win anything without hardmen in the PL, who said anything about Chelsea not having Hardmen in the team? Lampard will still play a part next season, Mikel will as will Ivanovic, Cahill, Luiz and Terry! not exactly a bunch of softies are they?Saying that it is a step up isn't arrogant, but you almost implied that Hazard will have to change his playing style to be more defensive in England. I was probably reading too much into it but this is the line that bothered me 'Players know if they come to the PL, they have to work for the team', so players in other leageus don't work for their teams?I never said anything about Chelsea not having hardmen, I was saying that since Arsenal lacked hardmen they failed. My main gripe was that having Modric in the double pivot is too attack minded and would end up being cut top pieces with a concise counter. Modric and Mikel wouldn't be viable cover for such an offensive line up. Mata doesn't track back very much anyway even when he does his challenges are rather sheepish. You must remember how easily Barcelona and Arsenal conceed on the counter, I'm not saying that Chelsea will play in the exact same way but an overly offensive line up can and will lead to disaster. I can just see the 5-3 against Arsenal happening again if Modric is played in a deep role. Don't forget that Tottenham wore torn to shreds against Manchester City and Arsenal (and Chelsea) last season, I'm not comparing Chelsea's and Tottenham's quality but the offensive and 'attractive' style of football can be dangerous. Against bottom half teams I would support this style but against the stonger sides it would be suicide.As I said earlier Modric would be more suited to a 4-3-3 formation where he allowed to take on the 'Iniesta' role. 4-2-3-1 just seems to flimsy for an overly offensive team. I feel that the double pivot has to be overly defensive for it to work.vI'm not sold on Ramires in the double pivot either, his passing is kind of really bad. nadavTKL and English Freak 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capriccioso 2,545 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Saying that it is a step up isn't arrogant, but you almost implied that Hazard will have to change his playing style to be more defensive in England. I was probably reading too much into it but this is the line that bothered me 'Players know if they come to the PL, they have to work for the team', so players in other leageus don't work for their teams?I never said anything about Chelsea not having hardmen, I was saying that since Arsenal lacked hardmen they failed. My main gripe was that having Modric in the double pivot is too attack minded and would end up being cut top pieces with a concise counter. Modric and Mikel wouldn't be viable cover for such an offensive line up. Mata doesn't track back very much anyway even when he does his challenges are rather sheepish. You must remember how easily Barcelona and Arsenal conceed on the counter, I'm not saying that Chelsea will play in the exact same way but an overly offensive line up can and will lead to disaster. I can just see the 5-3 against Arsenal happening again if Modric is played in a deep role. Don't forget that Tottenham wore torn to shreds against Manchester City and Arsenal (and Chelsea) last season, I'm not comparing Chelsea's and Tottenham's quality but the offensive and 'attractive' style of football can be dangerous. Against bottom half teams I would support this style but against the stonger sides it would be suicide.As I said earlier Modric would be more suited to a 4-3-3 formation where he allowed to take on the 'Iniesta' role. 4-2-3-1 just seems to flimsy for an overly offensive team. I feel that the double pivot has to be overly defensive for it to work.vI'm not sold on Ramires in the double pivot either, his passing is kind of really bad.Pirlo also has a monster free kick on him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spike 12,049 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Pirlo also has a monster free kick on him.Wrong topic, Cap? capriccioso 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
English Freak 456 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Saying that it is a step up isn't arrogant, but you almost implied that Hazard will have to change his playing style to be more defensive in England. I was probably reading too much into it but this is the line that bothered me 'Players know if they come to the PL, they have to work for the team', so players in other leageus don't work for their teams?I never said anything about Chelsea not having hardmen, I was saying that since Arsenal lacked hardmen they failed. My main gripe was that having Modric in the double pivot is too attack minded and would end up being cut top pieces with a concise counter. Modric and Mikel wouldn't be viable cover for such an offensive line up. Mata doesn't track back very much anyway even when he does his challenges are rather sheepish. You must remember how easily Barcelona and Arsenal conceed on the counter, I'm not saying that Chelsea will play in the exact same way but an overly offensive line up can and will lead to disaster. I can just see the 5-3 against Arsenal happening again if Modric is played in a deep role. Don't forget that Tottenham wore torn to shreds against Manchester City and Arsenal (and Chelsea) last season, I'm not comparing Chelsea's and Tottenham's quality but the offensive and 'attractive' style of football can be dangerous. Against bottom half teams I would support this style but against the stonger sides it would be suicide.As I said earlier Modric would be more suited to a 4-3-3 formation where he allowed to take on the 'Iniesta' role. 4-2-3-1 just seems to flimsy for an overly offensive team. I feel that the double pivot has to be overly defensive for it to work. I'm not sold on Ramires in the double pivot either, his passing is kind of really bad.Totally agree.Modric would be most effective in a 3-man midfield at Chelsea.I think if we stick with the 4-2-3-1...Ramires will have to play RW.Most effective lineup next season (not including any potential transfers):CechIvan---Terry (Luiz)---Cahill---ColeMikel--LampsRamires (Marin)----Mata-----HazardTorres (Sturridge) TorontoChelsea and Spike 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 So, which is better?--Mata-----Torres-----Hazard-------Ramires------Modric-------------------Mikel-------------Or------------Torres-------------Hazard--Mata--Marin-------Modric------Mikel-----IMO In the 4-3-3 Mata and Hazard may have a little less influence. Plus having that 3 man supply line in the 4-2-3-1 would help Torres more. In the 4-3-3 Ramires would start as he can defend and also his running and break aways would be great. I think Modric can play the double pivot role. Admittedly the 4-3-3 formation is more balanced but the 4-2-3-1 has more potency and creativity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
English Freak 456 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 So, which is better?--Mata-----Torres-----Hazard-------Ramires------Modric-------------------Mikel-------------Or------------Torres-------------Hazard--Mata--Marin-------Modric------Mikel-----IMO In the 4-3-3 Mata and Hazard may have a little less influence. Plus having that 3 man supply line in the 4-2-3-1 would help Torres more. In the 4-3-3 Ramires would start as he can defend and also his running and break aways would be great. I think Modric can play the double pivot role. Admittedly the 4-3-3 formation is more balanced but the 4-2-3-1 has more potency and creativity.Neither...Modric is still a Spurs player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmarlow 458 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 So, which is better?--Mata-----Torres-----Hazard-------Ramires------Modric-------------------Mikel-------------Or------------Torres-------------Hazard--Mata--Marin-------Modric------Mikel-----IMO In the 4-3-3 Mata and Hazard may have a little less influence. Plus having that 3 man supply line in the 4-2-3-1 would help Torres more. In the 4-3-3 Ramires would start as he can defend and also his running and break aways would be great. I think Modric can play the double pivot role. Admittedly the 4-3-3 formation is more balanced but the 4-2-3-1 has more potency and creativity.neither.------------Torres-------------Hazard--Mata--Ramires-------Modric------Mikel-----that is the best, most effective and well balanced line up. imo. Naked Mole Rat 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 neither.------------Torres-------------Hazard--Mata--Ramires-------Modric------Mikel-----that is the best, most effective and well balanced line up. imo.We'll probably get a RW though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Reid 25 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 No Lampard or Hulk lads? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spike 12,049 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 No Lampard or Hulk lads?I'd rather Lamps over Modric in the double pivot everyday. silkycuts, nadavTKL, TorontoChelsea and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slam Dunk 1,442 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Interesting quotes from Bilic (if true) saying Modric is close to agreeing a move to Spain. Has to be Madrid, surely?http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11661/7822895/Bilic-makes-Modric-claim ulsterchelsea 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spike 12,049 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Interesting quotes from Bilic (if true) saying Modric is close to agreeing a move to Spain. Has to be Madrid, surely?http://www1.skysport...es-Modric-claimYep, every other source says that Real Madrid is the destination.http://msn.foxsports.com/foxsoccer/england/story/paper-chase-jun-18-luka-modric-tottenham-midfielder-real-madrid-061812- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
English Freak 456 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Interesting quotes from Bilic (if true) saying Modric is close to agreeing a move to Spain. Has to be Madrid, surely?http://www1.skysport...es-Modric-claimCould be Malaga..you never know..they got a Qatari president..plenty of cash to splash around, they need quality players & they are in the UCL qualifying stages next season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capriccioso 2,545 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Wrong topic, Cap?Oops Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TorontoChelsea 4,064 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Yep, every other source says that Real Madrid is the destination.Interesting...who would sit? Right now, they have Alonso and Khedira as their deep lying midfielders and both deserve to be starting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spike 12,049 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Interesting...who would sit? Right now, they have Alonso and Khedira as their deep lying midfielders and both deserve to be starting.Not to mention Sahin. Poor old Sahin...Roman sign him up. KonohasOrangeFlash 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Severinb 309 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Not too sure about quotes and i he has said he wants to stay in London. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Oh... finaly someone who gets it.People need to understand that when you have that front 4, which basicly cant realy defend (exept Mata), you got to havestrong defense, and a very storng defensive midfield. Thats if you want to win trophis off course, otherwise we can easilyturned into arsenal or spurs. We should keep playing Mikel and Lamps.Good argument, but playing Mikel and Lamps in that midfield 2 is essentially the same as playing Modric and Mikel in that midfield 2. With the potential front 4 we'll have, I'd rather have Mikel and Ramires in that two. Ramires could perform his ball winning duties well with Mikel protecting the back four, whilst also aiding in counters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TorontoChelsea 4,064 Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 Good argument, but playing Mikel and Lamps in that midfield 2 is essentially the same as playing Modric and Mikel in that midfield 2.With the potential front 4 we'll have, I'd rather have Mikel and Ramires in that two. Ramires could perform his ball winning duties well with Mikel protecting the back four, whilst also aiding in counters.I think Mikel and Ramires together regularly would be a disaster. You need to have good ball movement and creativity from the deep lying midfielders and neither Ramires or Mikel is remotely capable of playing that role. You need someone who can get the ball from the defense to the attackers and who can spring the counter-attack with intelligence. Can you see Ramires or Mikel playing a long ball to Hazard as he streak down the wing? Can you see them playing a 30 yard beautiful through-ball to Mata coming through the middle? Not a chance. So, what you'd have instead is Mata coming back deep to get the ball which would in effect turn the 4-2-3-1 into a 4-3-2-1.I think Lampard backed by Meireles makes the most sense if Chelsea play that system. Spike, nadavTKL and royg 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts