Jump to content

Luka Modric


DavidEU
 Share

Recommended Posts

Apparently spurs buying gylfi sigurdsson for £8m which is likely to pave the way for modric to leave. (as per sky sports)

So no one will say anything about a player joining a club when there is no manager like a lot of people did with Hazard?

Nope don't think so!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do we really need him?

I think we have enough options in the midfeild if we want to add Josh to the line-up (squad depth) as well as maybe using someone Kevin there if need be. They would want a stupidly large amount of money for him anyway!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ramires? Lol with the money that i assume that chelsea have at their disposal, having modric in the midfield would be only a plus. Ramires can go fudge him self for a whole evening if compared to modric.

You're not one to talk as you're not a Chelsea fan and haven't seen him game in and game out. He is underrated and is a very good player. Playing him in the double pivot role could be devestating. He is very quick, pretty strong and improving his finishing. The way you're making Ramires sound like a mediocre player shows you know very little of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do we really need him?

I think we have enough options in the midfeild if we want to add Josh to the line-up (squad depth) as well as maybe using someone Kevin there if need be. They would want a stupidly large amount of money for him anyway!

Do we really need him?????

Very bad question!

But hey, even Ivan knows how much we need a player like him in our squad......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're not one to talk as you're not a Chelsea fan and haven't seen him game in and game out. He is underrated and is a very good player. Playing him in the double pivot role could be devestating. He is very quick, pretty strong and improving his finishing. The way you're making Ramires sound like a mediocre player shows you know very little of him.

No i said something and you decided to take it as that, i cant control what that brain inside your noggin thinks. Modric > Ramires, thats my point, you go ahead and think whatever you want, boy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're not one to talk as you're not a Chelsea fan and haven't seen him game in and game out. He is underrated and is a very good player. Playing him in the double pivot role could be devestating. He is very quick, pretty strong and improving his finishing. The way you're making Ramires sound like a mediocre player shows you know very little of him.

He was comparing him to Modric, so in that sense Modric is miles ahead.

But then again, Modric and Ramires are two different players, so it really does not matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh so what you're telling me is that if we buy a RW, CM and a RB who help us win the league you will continue to say we shouldn't have bought them...........?

I'll support Chelsea no matter what, but that kind of spending is disastrous for football. Not just because it makes competition impossible for any team not owned by a billionaire, and it raises transfer costs and wages to ridiculous rates, but because it takes away pride and joy from winning. If we went out and bought Hulk and a CM like Moutinho, our starting XI would cost something like 230+M. So, we beat Arsenal and Spurs? Well, if we spend quadruple what they spend, of course we are going to beat them. It's like challenging someone to a car race and buying a sportscar when they have a 1998 Toyota. It's not a triumph of effort or tactics, it's a triumph of spending much more money.Some teams are always going to spend more than others and that's fine, that's actually good for football, but it has to be within a level that a number of teams can compete and where no team is spending 20 times what other clubs are spending. Two seasons ago, Real Madrid rejuvenated their club by buying Khediera, Ozil, Carvalho, Di Maria, and Canalas. They sold van der Vart. Total expenditure? Just over 50M pounds. You're talking about a 100M summer transfer period for Chelsea and over 270M spent in just over 2 years. That's just insane. I want Chelsea to win but I want us to win in a competitive league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll ignore you're imature posts from now on. Please be less deluded and more informed in the future.

I'll ignore you're imature posts from now on. Please be less deluded and more informed in the future.

Deal with it buddy lol. ahaha :clown: Cheers :blue scalf:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is not a troll. He is generally right, like I tend to be, and then people like you call me Barcelona fans! :lol:

I like people who have different opinion!

You can go to all of my posts and if you look at them from an educated perspective, then i have never said anything "wrong", its the fickle who react badly :)

and for your info, i like you as a poster too justin B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyways, the only concern with Modric is the defensive duties that the Double Pivot role requires. He isn't the best defensively. He can defend but he needs to be up to it as leaving just Mikel alone shielding the back 4 can be suicide. I'm starting to like the idea of Moutinho more and more. Cheaper (not by much I know), younger, arguably about the same quality and gives us better defensive capabilities than Modric. Moutinho is better suited for the double pivot whereas Modric is more of a 4-3-3 man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You