Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


Tomo
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Liuxas said:

I hope we will not gonna buy strikers and no more players from Serie A . Its must be lesson from us that most of the Serie A players which Chelsea bought failed at Chelsea. If we need striker we should target Julian Alvarez from City i think he is hidden gem and we might get him because i don't think he always want to be in Halland shadow. Also a lot of people saying about Lavia from Southampton but i don't see anything special in him. In my opinion we need 4 more players in summer. A Goalkeeper, proper DM, Striker and Center Defender after we sell KK.

We might need a lot more, depending on outgoings. At least we have Colwill incoming for that CB spot though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Liuxas said:

I hope we will not gonna buy strikers and no more players from Serie A . Its must be lesson from us that most of the Serie A players which Chelsea bought failed at Chelsea. If we need striker we should target Julian Alvarez from City i think he is hidden gem and we might get him because i don't think he always want to be in Halland shadow. Also a lot of people saying about Lavia from Southampton but i don't see anything special in him. In my opinion we need 4 more players in summer. A Goalkeeper, proper DM, Striker and Center Defender after we sell KK.

Osimhen is in Serie A and he is special, with Vlahovic of Juve likely the 2 best CF out there who is actually available. Thus, out the door goes your entire construct there IMHO.

Citeh is never going to sell Alvarez to us.

If you don't rate Lavia (which is a legit stance) who do you want for DMF? 

As for the disastrous KK buy, good luck selling him whilst he is on £295K PW for 4 years. Ughhhhhh. Nightmarish. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, DDA said:

After what I just saw of Onana on MoTD, get that lad here.... skill, strength, passion and desire. 

 

Perfect.

 

 

Like I said when we showed interest, he has many attributes we lack in midfield. 
 

anyone know the reason he rejected us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ulsterchelsea said:

Correct me if I'm wrong but Nkunku hasn't been officially announced right? Why is that out of interest. The world and his wife are talking about it being done and agreed so why it not announced?

My guess: Since we havent signed him on loan like Gusto, but just found a pre-agreement for the summer, the player isn't really associated with us yet in any way. Meaning we can't show him in our jersey, interview him or any of that stuff. All we could do is two lines of "We have found an agreement etc..", which probably isn't the grandiose type of announcement the owners have in mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang will 100% leave Chelsea in 2023

Graham Potter on Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang out of Chelsea UCL squad: “Pierre has done nothing wrong at all, no problem. It’s just unfortunate and Aubameyang will fight for his place until the rest of the season.”

https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fa23a08c1-3588-4abf-9e87-411308fcdc6d_2500x1711.webp

There was already talk of Aubameyang leaving in January, but it was impossible for Barcelona to proceed due to FIFA rules, they like the player but nothing else because of official rules. I think Aubameyang will 100% leave Chelsea in 2023, the plan is clear.

📰 Chelsea are ready to join the race for Napoli striker Victor Osimhen in the summer transfer window (Mirror)

Edited by Vesper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Hashishi said:

How will man city points deduction affect us?

It wont happen. They will wriggle out of it or it’ll be a fine. Plus even if they got a point deduction not gonna improve our chances of making the top 4. We need to do that by improving ourselves. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s going to take YEARS of appeals and lawsuits before anything comes of the City situation. 

From what I’ve seen a lot of these charges relate to their dodgy sponsorships over the years which have been blindingly obvious for a decade. It’s insane that for years City’s owners have been able to sponsor the club with companies they own or are connected with directly. Likewise PSG.

I don’t think this has anything to do with their actual transfer spending so this isn’t something we as Chelsea supporters need to worry about. This is about accounting breaches I think. 
 

The idea that Man City, a club with nowhere NEAR the global following of the other Big 6, has the highest revenue in world football in a legitimate way is laughable. Their dodgy ass sponsorships drastically over inflate those figures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You