MoroccanBlue 5,395 Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 Just now, Pizy said: Yeah, if Reece gets injured we’re in trouble once again. Ruben at RWB probably. oldportblue 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizy 19,037 Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 4 minutes ago, MoroccanBlue said: Ruben at RWB probably. Yuck. One of Ruben’s most annoying traits is his awareness (or lack thereof). In midfield he gets caught napping or just slowly jogging around nonchalantly. Having him do that as a wingback for any extended length of time sounds terrible. It was always probably unrealistic to expect us to sign another super expensive LWB in Cucurella as well as a new RWB. But it leaves us pretty short of quality if James does a hammy or something again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maravel21 36 Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 Who cares is we sign fofana ? Boycie 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maravel21 36 Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 2 minutes ago, Pizy said: Yuck. One of Ruben’s most annoying traits is his awareness (or lack thereof). In midfield he gets caught napping or just slowly jogging around nonchalantly. Having him do that as a wingback for any extended length of time sounds terrible. It was always probably unrealistic to expect us to sign another super expensive LWB in Cucurella as well as a new RWB. But it leaves us pretty short of quality if James does a hammy or something again. You can’t have two world class players for one position 🤣 if Haaland does a hammy ,city must sign a new haaland ? This is football you should have and luck in your team Boycie 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo 21,751 Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 1 minute ago, Maravel21 said: You can’t have two world class players for one position 🤣 if Haaland does a hammy ,city must sign a new haaland ? This is football you should have and luck in your team Actually from what i've seen and heard Haaland's 'back up' is a lot more suited to Pep's style. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maravel21 36 Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 (edited) If we sign fofana actually I don’t care about azpi he will be benchwarmer. If Reece James gets injured we have and challobah for Rwb position . Chalobah is a good second choice he is a good defender not perfect but ok Edited August 4, 2022 by Maravel21 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizy 19,037 Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 2 minutes ago, Maravel21 said: You can’t have two world class players for one position 🤣 if Haaland does a hammy ,city must sign a new haaland ? This is football you should have and luck in your team If Haaland does his hammy they also bought Alvarez who some think will eventually be even better. But anyways, we didn’t need to sign some top class new RWB to backup James. Just someone who can actually run, contribute a little to the attack, and not get ripped apart in open space defensively. Azpi has looked really poor for a while now. He’s still capable of the odd class performance, yes. Maravel21 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mário César 1,376 Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 If we sign fofana, I guess its okey Chilwell (Cucurella) Thiago, KK, Forfana (Chalobah/Azpi/Cucurella) Reece (Azpi) I think its okay lets see if we sign both cucu and forfana Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! Blues Forever 1,232 Posted August 4, 2022 Popular Post! Share Posted August 4, 2022 Fernando, Strike, bigbluewillie and 2 others 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blues Forever 1,232 Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizy 19,037 Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 Colwill going to Brighton permanently with a reasonable buy back clause was a great deal. If we now try to get cute and insist that it’s only a loan (which Brighton would be kinda dumb to accept) and screw up this deal I’m gonna be pissed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! MoroccanBlue 5,395 Posted August 4, 2022 Popular Post! Share Posted August 4, 2022 13 minutes ago, Pizy said: Colwill going to Brighton permanently with a reasonable buy back clause was a great deal. If we now try to get cute and insist that it’s only a loan (which Brighton would be kinda dumb to accept) and screw up this deal I’m gonna be pissed. Why? We are paying the full valuation on Cucurella. Why should Brighton dictate how we should sell or loan Colwill? Hamilton, Strike, oldportblue and 5 others 7 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LAM09 7,077 Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 13 minutes ago, Pizy said: Colwill going to Brighton permanently with a reasonable buy back clause was a great deal. If we now try to get cute and insist that it’s only a loan (which Brighton would be kinda dumb to accept) and screw up this deal I’m gonna be pissed. We want the best deal for ourselves at the end of the day. Both deals are supposedly separate, so the ball should be in our court. If they were to lower the price as a result, that would be a different story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizy 19,037 Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 1 minute ago, MoroccanBlue said: Why? We are paying the full valuation on Cucurella. Why should Brighton dictate how we should sell or loan Colwill? Because they have him under a long contract and apparently will ONLY sell if Colwill goes the other way. Them basically renting him for a year in exchange for their best player is a shit deal for them. Boycie 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! MoroccanBlue 5,395 Posted August 4, 2022 Popular Post! Share Posted August 4, 2022 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Pizy said: Because they have him under a long contract and apparently will ONLY sell if Colwill goes the other way. Them basically renting him for a year in exchange for their best player is a shit deal for them. That makes no sense and puts Brighton in a fragile position moving forward as they will be known to change goal posts. They had a valuation on Cucurella, we met it and reliable journalists are saying it’s signed. They want us to work with them on Colwill as good gesture, however we are only looking for the best interest for ourselves. Did Brighton give us a discount on Cucurella? No, they didn’t. We owe them nothing. Edited August 4, 2022 by MoroccanBlue Johnnyeye, mkh, Duppy Conqueror and 5 others 7 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LAM09 7,077 Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 3 minutes ago, Pizy said: Because they have him under a long contract and apparently will ONLY sell if Colwill goes the other way. Them basically renting him for a year in exchange for their best player is a shit deal for them. Trossard is their best player Hamilton 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blues Forever 1,232 Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milka 3,407 Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 Simon1991 and Johnnyeye 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blues Forever 1,232 Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 Magic Lamps 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizy 19,037 Posted August 4, 2022 Share Posted August 4, 2022 Unless Cucu is seen primarily as our new LCB, imagine if KK is the only CB we buy this summer with Azpi being seen as a stopgap… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now