Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


J.F.
 Share

Recommended Posts

Not interested at £80m in Jan tbh. That's MAYBE his summer transfer window value coming off of a full, good season where he's scored 20+ goals. Not his Jan value after a lengthy ban with zero training.

I would think £50m + some serious performance related add ons (maybe up to £15m?) would be sensible.

Edited by Mhsc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mhsc said:

Not interested at £80m in Jan tbh. That's MAYBE his summer transfer window value coming off of a full, good season where he's scored 20+ goals. Not his Jan value after a lengthy ban with zero training.

I would think £50m + some serious performance related add ons (maybe up to £15m?) would be sensible.

Other clubs will be in for him. Won't go for a sensible price

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ivan Toney is nowhere near an £80m striker and we’d be insane to pay that. Even in our current era of dramatically overpaying for players that would be crazy.

Think £45-50m for an established English striker would be fair. But for £80m you should be looking at a truly special footballer which Toney ain’t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, xPetrCechx said:

Kudus to Westspam.

This years competition in the PL is ridiculous. Teams like Villa, Brighton and West Ham would be disappointed if they finish 8th or 9th tbh. The top 10 is closer to each other than ever before. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DDA said:

I see Toney is on the cards. All for it but not for 80m... he may be worth that without the ban but with it being a factor there needs to be a discount.

£80m is a shit tonne for a player who turns 29 in the winter of next season

Edited by Vesper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, mkh said:

 AS Roma will pay #Chelsea €10million to loan Romelu Lukaku, who has already spoken with Jose Mourinho, and cover his wages.

Other than the fact that he will take loan slot it's actually quite good business for us. I am surprised Roma is able to afford his wages. However their option as striker is Belotti, so they must be desperate

Edited by ulvhedin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ulvhedin said:

Other than the fact that he will take loan sloat it's actually quite good business for us. I am surprised Roma is able to afford his wages. However their option as striker is Belotti, so they must be desperate

Yep, the Tammy injury recently has completely fucked them. So I guess Jose and their owners have decided that rather than going out and buying a new striker for tens of millions, the loan fee + his huge wages are still cheaper than that.

Just hope he performs well enough for them or someone else to finally take him off our books for good this time next summer. Because if he fucks up at Roma I don’t know what we’re gonna do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Yep, the Tammy injury recently has completely fucked them. So I guess Jose and their owners have decided that rather than going out and buying a new striker for tens of millions, the loan fee + his huge wages are still cheaper than that.

Just hope he performs well enough for them or someone else to finally take him off our books for good this time next summer. Because if he fucks up at Roma I don’t know what we’re gonna do.

Lukaku's the kinda guy who makes root for Inflation and the Saudis. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...