Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and log in to join the CFC discussion! ×

Chelsea Transfers

Tomo

By Tomo,
in Matthew Harding Stand

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 62k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vesper

    8538

  • Pizy

    3914

  • ZAPHOD2319

    2695

  • TheHulk

    2300

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Gundalf
Gundalf
Sankaunited
Sankaunited

I'm Dutch and a PSV supporter. Home and bored with the flu and so I got on a Chelsea forum. Hope you dont mind that I share my insight about Madueke as I obviously seen all his matches.  I see qu

Special Juan
Special Juan

Azpi official video released, he's gone- very emotional unlike the little skinny cunt

Posted Images

Gundalf

Gundalf 804

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Maravel21 said:

Clearlake capital wow 

Huh? How can u afford all these players with only 150m?

Fofana and De Jong alone would be way over that 150 already. The headline should be 250, thats more realistic. 

 

😭😭😭😭😭

Edited by Gundalf
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gundalf

Gundalf 804

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, King Kante said:

Gallagher isn't going anywhere. We only have two fit CM's or 3 with RLC. 

He will have 2 games to show TT what he can do. If he plays badly, we might sign another Midfielder and let Gallagher go on loan. I think Tuchels dream scenario would be to sign De Jong and loan Gallagher. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
blahblahblah

blahblahblah 73

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Kong said:

Your nick name makes sense now

Hmmm. Just wondering why someone would be more interested in the nick rather than actually making his/her point about the actual argument. Unless there is no point to be made. 

How did auba perform at arsenal in his final year(s)? How is he as a character in the dressing room? These are far more important points and parameters to be discussed given the argument rather than someone's nick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
YorkshireBlue

YorkshireBlue 3,118

Posted
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, blahblahblah said:

Hmmm. Just wondering why someone would be more interested in the nick rather than actually making his/her point about the actual argument. Unless there is no point to be made. 

How did auba perform at arsenal in his final year(s)? How is he as a character in the dressing room? These are far more important points and parameters to be discussed given the argument rather than someone's nick.

Better than lukaku did here and werner. And egos lol did u even see lukaku here.

Edited by Kong
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Vesper

Vesper 28,388

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Blue Armour said:

Anelka worked for us because he was a very intelligent player.

not when he was doing this lol

Who, What, Why: What is the quenelle gesture? - BBC News

Quenelle_liste_anti-sioniste.jpg

A campaign poster for the 2009 election promoting the anti-Zionist list, featuring the quenelle gesture

Link to comment
Share on other sites
blahblahblah

blahblahblah 73

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Kong said:

Better than lukaku did here and werner. And egos lol did u even see lukaku here.

He was? Really?

He scored 4 goals in half a season playing 15 PL games. Infact he played 1040 minutes and scored 4 goals. 

Lukaku last season played 1584 PL minutes and scored 8 goals. While not being the primary penalty taker where as auba was as far as i remember. So by which was he better than Lukaku, care to explain? Or are you more interested in discussing nicks

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Vesper

Vesper 28,388

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, blahblahblah said:

He was? Really?

He scored 4 goals in half a season playing 15 PL games. Infact he played 1040 minutes and scored 4 goals. 

Lukaku last season played 1584 PL minutes and scored 8 goals. While not being the primary penalty taker where as auba was as far as i remember. So by which was he better than Lukaku, care to explain? Or are you more interested in discussing nicks

I would rather be turked in me arse by a syphilitic bear than see Donkeykaku here ever again

Link to comment
Share on other sites
blahblahblah

blahblahblah 73

Posted
Posted
Just now, Vesper said:

I would rather be turked in me arse by a syphilitic bear than see Donkeykaku here ever again

I am not saying to get Lukaku back. 

But i would not shoot myself by getting auba or Darren bent or kalou for him. 

Getting auba for Lukaku is a downgrade, syphilitic bears be involved or not 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ZAPHOD2319

ZAPHOD2319 4,416

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, blahblahblah said:

He was? Really?

He scored 4 goals in half a season playing 15 PL games. Infact he played 1040 minutes and scored 4 goals. 

Lukaku last season played 1584 PL minutes and scored 8 goals. While not being the primary penalty taker where as auba was as far as i remember. So by which was he better than Lukaku, care to explain? Or are you more interested in discussing nicks

Lukaku was a terrible presence for the team from day one. He clashed with players on the team the moment he got here. He was constant distraction. I am not really high on Auba, but I would use a better comparison than Lukaku, that was an absolute disaster.

 

Edit to add. Auba is by this time of his career a tap in merchant, but he does press rather hard and flies around the field. His offensive output is definitely declining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
blahblahblah

blahblahblah 73

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, ZAPHOD2319 said:

Lukaku was a terrible presence for the team from day one. He clashed with players on the team the moment he got here. He was constant distraction. I am not really high on Auba, but I would use a better comparison that Lukaku, that was an absolute disaster.

Why? We are replacing Lukaku with auba. Auba is coming here to fill in the no. 9 position so it's obvious the comparisons will be there. 

We are spending 25m on a 33 year old has been and paying him 200kpw for it. Someone who is as disruptive in the dressing rooms and having worse performance and numbers. 

Sorry, but i would not want to get cancer just to be rid off aids. Absolutely mental the whole scenario 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ZAPHOD2319

ZAPHOD2319 4,416

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, blahblahblah said:

Why? We are replacing Lukaku with auba. Auba is coming here to fill in the no. 9 position so it's obvious the comparisons will be there. 

We are spending 25m on a 33 year old has been and paying him 200kpw for it. Someone who is as disruptive in the dressing rooms and having worse performance and numbers. 

Sorry, but i would not want to get cancer just to be rid off aids. Absolutely mental the whole scenario 

Lukaku is a much worse cancer. A diagnosis that has been confirmed at several clubs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You

Sure, let me in!
Enter