Chelsea Transfers

[Artandur 939]

1 minute ago, Hermione said:

Me too but without those 2 or at least one of them coming (Fofana or De Jong) this has been a bang average window and I'm not sure I have confidence we will get Top 4.

I'd actually say it's been a great window so far. Definitely above average. Sadly with the state our squad is in we'd need an absolutely brilliant one in order to be competitive

[Nero 1,838]

 

[Duppy Conqueror 1,494]

24 minutes ago, Artandur said:

I'd actually say it's been a great window so far. Definitely above average. Sadly with the state our squad is in we'd need an absolutely brilliant one in order to be competitive

I agree. Nailed 3 out of 3 on our major signings ,brought in several very promising youngsters.brought back some of our higher performing loan outs.

is only Rudi i’ll truly miss from departures but KK a very good replacement. 

Sterling and Cruella upgrades.

de Jong,Fofana (or Skriniar) and we be closer to capable of challenging for league again.

Edited August 10, 2022 by Duppy Conqueror

[guddy69 174]

2 hours ago, Fernando said:

What website you guys use to get reliable Chelsea news?

Skysports website is so United bias. More articles for United then any other team and getting tired of that. 

If United players fart, they write an article about that. 

Not worth my time anymore going there. 

Try NewsNow Chelsea.. 

[Maravel21 36]

 Goaaaal 

9/10 if we sign de jong and fofana 

 

[MoroccanBlue 5,303]

I mean its a win/win for us simply put. 

Either we get De Jong, or Barcelona go bust. 

Edited August 10, 2022 by MoroccanBlue

[MoroccanBlue 5,303]

3 minutes ago, Hermione said:

Basically said he was willing to join even without CL football and indicated that to ETH previously but he supposedly changed his mind over the summer.

De Jong would be borderline stupid to join United atm. 

[Maravel21 36]

Aubameyang for Sub is good why you don’t like him as a player ?  Havertz is better than him ?😂

[Pizy 18,368]

I’d give our window thus far a solid 7/10. If we get Fofana I’d bump it up to a 9/10. Anything else after that  would be insane.

[Nero 1,838]

 

[Blues Forever 1,232]

2 minutes ago, Maravel21 said:

Aubameyang for Sub is good why you don’t like him as a player ?  Havertz is better than him ?😂

Few reason:

1. Very good Poacher, but limited at everything else.

2. Old and declined.

3. Attitude problem.

4. Want a high salary.

[YorkshireBlue 3,122]

11 minutes ago, Blues Forever said:

Few reason:

1. Very good Poacher, but limited at everything else.

2. Old and declined.

3. Attitude problem.

4. Want a high salary.

For a season I think a poacher is what we need, havertz is bascally a ghost around the box, also when he presses he just gives fouls away constantly.

[Maravel21 36]

For one year he is fine no as a starter but as a sub . 

[Blues Forever 1,232]

1 minute ago, Maravel21 said:

For one year he is fine no as a starter but as a sub . 

You think he will accept a short contract? Might as well stay at Barca lol.

[Last Sicarius 610]

Just keep Auba as far as possible from Chelsea please.

[Magic Lamps 11,654]

Aubameyang is terrible. His legs have gone, he is old, toxic and the mother of big game chokers 

[YorkshireBlue 3,122]

15 minutes ago, Magic Lamps said:

Aubameyang is terrible. His legs have gone, he is old, toxic and the mother of big game chokers 

Maybe his legs have gone but most teams in the PL we dominate possession and normally parked in their half! we don't need legs! We need some 1 to be able to put the ball in the net. Might not be as effective against the top teams but the lower teams hes exactly what we lack.

Edited August 10, 2022 by Kong

[Pizy 18,368]

If it was a simple 1 season loan I’d reluctantly accept it due to the fact that he’s worked with Tuchel before.

But as was pointed out to me here yesterday he’s on a multi-year contract at Barca. So if he signs for us now why would he agree to only 1 year where he’s got no longer term security and could be scrambling for yet another club a year from now?