🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Ben Chilwell

[Vesper 30,181]

1 minute ago, DDA said:

 

Exactly. I wasn't claiming they turn into Zidane post 24 years of age lol.

But

I was saying that a player never stops learning and improving leading into his early 30's. 

Some players really hit their peak in terms of consistency when approaching 30.

How old is VVD?

How old was CR7 at Real Madrid when he was tallying up crazy numbers and the height of his powers?

I'm pretty sure Fat Ronaldo was over 24 when he destroyed Man United in the CL and took Brazil to the WC final pretty much single handedly.

And I am talking about the greats here.

There are literally 'thousands' of cases where average players improve post 24.. and go on to have pretty decent careers. 

So the point I was making was... this if you arent the finished article by 24 then your wont ever be... is utter bullshit.

never said the finished article

but if you are 25 or older and not a player of impact by then (not saying superstar at all) then the odds are very low you become one

sure there are multiple examples, but it definitely is not the norm

I never said, to repeat, that player do not improve above 24, most do (other than the ones who peak early and decline and/or the injury-riddled ones, which are often the same)

[Special Juan 28,141]

I love the way the shutters go down in regards to Chilwell offering something and improving, but when it comes to Hakim Ziyech who's 27 it's all "He's going to pull up trees"

A flair player and age shouldn't go against what either can offer.

Every single transfer is a risk, no matter how good you are or how middle of the road you are, there is nothing to say you will light the league up.

[Pizy 18,911]

Give him 10 games as a starter before we judge him at least. That'll be a good sample size.

If our attack is as substantially improved as it should be with all these signings Chilwell may not even be called into action defensively very often. If he's playing in the opponents half most of the time this will be a fantastic signing.

And seeing as we have the majority of the ball in all but maybe a handful of matches a season, I think it'll go well. And unlike Alonso, Chilwell has good recovery speed and can actually run past a defender when he's got the ball. Those two things alone should be a colossal upgrade.

Alonso can be kept around for the times when Frank switches to a back 3.

[Jype 6,398]

42 minutes ago, Pulisicismydaddy said:

I think it's sad how some are trying to find any excuse for Chilwell and pretend he is better than we've seen this season, you only need to read the Leicester forum to see how happy they are they got 50 mil for an average player. They watched him all season, I'd rather believe them when it comes to Chilwell than some here saying he can improve massively at 24 years old.

https://www.foxestalk.co.uk/topic/122605-ben-chilwell/#comments

Go have a look. I read the first ~15 pages of posts from May and like 95% were saying they'd be very disappointed if he was sold for any price. Also read some of the posts from last night when the news broke and even then most of them were saying they think the price is not good for them and Leicester should've held out for more money. Sure there's also some who think 50m is a good deal for them but certainly not a majority opinion.

Over there some think he's absolutely great, some think he's a good player who has some flaws but can still improve and only very few people are saying he's actually a bad player.  Chillwell divides their opinions like Willian here at TC.  

But saying they (Leicester fans) are collectively happy about Chillwell gone is simply not true and you need to have a serious agenda against the player if you can read that forum and conclude they all think he's shit and are happy with the sale.

[Vesper 30,181]

1 hour ago, Pulisicismydaddy said:

I think it's sad how some are trying to find any excuse for Chilwell and pretend he is better than we've seen this season, you only need to read the Leicester forum to see how happy they are they got 50 mil for an average player. They watched him all season, I'd rather believe them when it comes to Chilwell than some here saying he can improve massively at 24 years old.

I would rather have Theo or Reguilon, but not distraught over Chilwell at £50m

and, to agree (there seems to be some confusion here on my stance) with others

I DEFFO think he will absolutely improve over the next 2,3 years.

I am going to unequivocally say he is so not a shit buy when strictly speaking about the quality of the player

this exact moment in time (age tossed aside, potential down the road tossed asside, so only talking about the ONE season that soon starts, and also not talking about actual availability or wages or cost)

I rate the following LB's (and this is in exact order, so would be my choice of starters if I could choose ANYONE for thsi one coming season)

 

Alphonso Davies 
David Alaba    
Andrew Robertson    
Theo Hernández
Alex Sandro (last season this high)
Ferland Mendy
Sergio Reguilón
Ben Chilwell 
José Gayà
Renan Lodi  
Lucas Digne
Alex Telles
Ramy Bensebaini
Kieran Tierney
Nicolás Tagliafico
Jordi Alba (last season on this list, plus I detest him, but we are talking a one year team)
Robin Gosens
Rayan Aït Nouri   
Luca Pellegrini
Álex Grimaldo

[Iggy Doonican 4,186]

12 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Give him 10 games as a starter before we judge him at least

Exactly, signing for a club like Chelsea could be the making of him. Slagging off someone before he's kicked a ball for us is ridiculous and let me tell you Lampard wasn't exactly a popular buy when we bought him from West Ham he turned out pretty well didn't he.

[YorkshireBlue 3,277]

8 minutes ago, Iggy Doonican said:

Exactly, signing for a club like Chelsea could be the making of him. Slagging off someone before he's kicked a ball for us is ridiculous and let me tell you Lampard wasn't exactly a popular buy when we bought him from West Ham he turned out pretty well didn't he.

Doesn't matter who we buy, some on here will find a fault with perfect 

 

[Pulisicismydaddy 91]

45 minutes ago, Jype said:

https://www.foxestalk.co.uk/topic/122605-ben-chilwell/#comments

Go have a look. I read the first ~15 pages of posts from May and like 95% were saying they'd be very disappointed if he was sold for any price. Also read some of the posts from last night when the news broke and even then most of them were saying they think the price is not good for them and Leicester should've held out for more money. Sure there's also some who think 50m is a good deal for them but certainly not a majority opinion.

Over there some think he's absolutely great, some think he's a good player who has some flaws but can still improve and only very few people are saying he's actually a bad player.  Chillwell divides their opinions like Willian here at TC.  

But saying they (Leicester fans) are collectively happy about Chillwell gone is simply not true and you need to have a serious agenda against the player if you can read that forum and conclude they all think he's shit and are happy with the sale.

Go and read the last 15 pages most are extremely happy he left for this sum, there are few sad on the price but the majority don't even care he left and are happy on the potential replacement who can improve them. Even his player thread was infested with members saying he is shit and wanted him gone. As a matter of fact the Bakayoko and Drinkwater threads first pages look almost identical to this one where people defend them for any reason under moon, unfortunately we know how those ended.

I'm not kin on this transfer one bit, you don't pay 50 mil for a player who is maximum at the same level to others costing 25 mil only because he is English and Lampard is obsessed with British players, the he knows the league is also overstated, if you're good you adapt in any league anyways, just like Thiago will adapt if he comes here and suddenly becomes our best defender, you either are good or not.

[Jype 6,398]

1 hour ago, Pulisicismydaddy said:

Go and read the last 15 pages most are extremely happy he left for this sum, there are few sad on the price but the majority don't even care he left and are happy on the potential replacement who can improve them. Even his player thread was infested with members saying he is shit and wanted him gone.

I'd much rather trust their opinions from the time when it wasn't yet clear he was going to be sold and everything was still on the rumor stage of things. Don't know about you but I've been following these transfer markets long enough to recognize the mental gymnastics many fans go through when a key player is leaving. It's the football version of a dude desperately trying to hit on a girl at a bar and after getting rejected he goes 'oh well, she wasn't really that good looking anyway'.

I'm not saying all their fans are like this and some may have had bad feelings about Chillwell for a longer time but the overwhelming majority liked him and wanted him to stay. All that revisionist thinking after the transfer is more or less done already is irrelevant.

 

1 hour ago, Pulisicismydaddy said:

As a matter of fact the Bakayoko and Drinkwater threads first pages look almost identical to this one where people defend them for any reason under moon, unfortunately we know how those ended.

Perhaps. But fact is Drinkwater was signed at 27yo and it was clear his level was never going to improve. Pretty much everyone thought he'd never be more than a half-decent backup / rotational option and I don't think anyone was ever under any delusion that he was going to be a big hitter for us. But even so I don't think many saw him being a total train wreck of a signing that he's turned out in the end. After all we were talking about an experienced PL level player at his peak years, one who only a year before was a starter in a title winning squad. His career got really fucked when Sarri never fancied him even for the backup role and I'm not sure but I think he may have developed himself a drinking problem during that season, seeing as he's had many alcohol-related incidents since then.

I admit I was excited about Bakayoko and got proven wrong. But I'm pretty sure you can find just as many threads about players who fans were initially not that keen on but who proved them wrong (ie. Pulisic who many considered just a marketing stunt for USA).

 

1 hour ago, Pulisicismydaddy said:

I'm not kin on this transfer one bit, you don't pay 50 mil for a player who is maximum at the same level to others costing 25 mil only because he is English and Lampard is obsessed with British players, the he knows the league is also overstated, if you're good you adapt in any league anyways, just like Thiago will adapt if he comes here and suddenly becomes our best defender, you either are good or not.

So who would you have gone for that is significantly better than Ben Chillwell?

And please for the love of motherfucker don't say Sergio Reguilon. He is not considerably better and RM want a buy-back clause on him which is the only reason he's available for a somewhat reasonable price. Without a buy-back we'd probably be looking at Chillwell type money, give or take a 5-10mil. The likes of Alex Telles and Nicolas Tagliafico come with just as many question marks as Chillwell, if not even more, and being 28yo neither of those are ever going to improve either. 

Personally I couldn't care less whether a signing costs 25m or 50m, as long as the club can afford it without it affecting other transfer targets. The only scenario where that money difference comes into play is if the player fails and needs to be sold, which is easier to do if he's cost less money. But if the club can afford it I'll happily accept the manager's personal choice because it shows he has a plan and the club are backing it, even if it is more expensive than some other option. 

All I'd like is for fans to actually give him a proper chance and not fucking abuse him on social media even before joining. He's not the one who sets the price tag on him. Slagging him off before he's even kicked a ball for the club is only going to increase the pressure on him.  

[Ryan Fong 2,776]

I think it's sad how some are trying to find any excuse for Chilwell and pretend he is better than we've seen this season, you only need to read the Leicester forum to see how happy they are they got 50 mil for an average player. They watched him all season, I'd rather believe them when it comes to Chilwell than some here saying he can improve massively at 24 years old.

Ironically you practically have watched Reguilon for 2 matches max then you are so sure he is better than Chilwell. Using your logic I’d rather believe Lampard and all the well paid scouts than you guys here saying Reguilon is a definite better buy, all things considered.

[Jase 43,479]

1 hour ago, Iggy Doonican said:

Exactly, signing for a club like Chelsea could be the making of him. Slagging off someone before he's kicked a ball for us is ridiculous and let me tell you Lampard wasn't exactly a popular buy when we bought him from West Ham he turned out pretty well didn't he.

It sure would have been had social media, TC etc existed back then...

[BlueLyon 9,359]

I wonder where will Estupinan end up. Electric fullback...

[Jase 43,479]

2 hours ago, Pulisicismydaddy said:

I think it's sad how some are trying to find any excuse for Chilwell and pretend he is better than we've seen this season, you only need to read the Leicester forum to see how happy they are they got 50 mil for an average player. They watched him all season, I'd rather believe them when it comes to Chilwell than some here saying he can improve massively at 24 years old.

What is sad is that people constantly moaning, crying and throwing their toys out of the pram over transfer targets. Not everyone is gonna agree on things, sure, but judging by some reactions on, say, Chilwell here, you would think we are signing someone from Fiji as opposed to an England international.

[Vesper 30,181]

12 minutes ago, Jason said:

What is sad is that people constantly moaning, crying and throwing their toys out of the pram over transfer targets. Not everyone is gonna agree on things, sure, but judging by some reactions on, say, Chilwell here, you would think we are signing someone from Fiji as opposed to an England international.

the money being discussed for months (£80m range) was the main issue for 95% of us

[Jase 43,479]

Just now, Vesper said:

the money being discussed for months (£80m range) was the main issue for 95% of us

It still seems to be an issue for many now, with the 50 million. 

[Vesper 30,181]

2 minutes ago, Jason said:

It still seems to be an issue for many now, with the 50 million. 

I am much less concerned at £50m than £80m, plus that RM demand of a buy-back clause on Reguilon really pisses me off

we are not a fucking RM training ground, regardless of Eden (we came the better there) or that fuckstick Cuntois (which is on the board as we should have sold him for £80m or so in summer 2017 and then we would not have had to panic buy shit Kepa)

[killer1257 3,282]

It still seems to be an issue for many now, with the 50 million. 

Yes, because he is still the second most expensive LB of all time. Do not forget the possibility of add ons like the telegraph mentionend.

All the other alternatives cost half the price of Chilwell. So very costly and high expectations for a guy that did not have a good last season. Also, we criticise Emerson and Alonso when Mahrez destroys them, but Chilwell gets destroyed by Mahrez too. I have also seen Lamptey destroying Chilwell. Moreover, he has been injured for two months now. So many reasons why we should stay away from Chilwell.


Gesendet von meinem VOG-L29 mit Tapatalk

[Jype 6,398]

33 minutes ago, Vesper said:

I am much less concerned at £50m than £80m, plus that RM demand of a buy-back clause on Reguilon really pisses me off

Yep, same here.

I'm not 100% sold on Chillwell's quality but all possible LB signings right now (Chillwell, Reguilon, Telles, Tagliafico) are gambles and at a much lower price than the £80M initially reported I'm more than happy with getting Chillwell if that's who Lampard really wants.

Surely Lampard and the rest of the coaching team have watched him extensively and know what they're getting to ask the club to commit that much funds for his signature. To say it's "English bias" is just lazy because Lamps has already gotten Werner, Ziyech and looking to get Havertz. He could easily have just gone for English alternative like Jack Grealish if being English mattered that much but it doesn't.

27 minutes ago, killer1257 said:

Yes, because he is still the second most expensive LB of all time. Do not forget the possibility of add ons like the telegraph mentionend.

Thing is, around 50m seems to be the new normal market price for that kind of player.

For full-backs that price has been paid for Walker, Wan-Bissaka, B. Mendy, F. Mendy and Cancelo in the last couple years. As far as the fee is concerned it matters fuck all whether it's a LB or RB.

And Lucas Hernandez went for €80M too, although with Davies playing as well as he has Hernandez has played primarily CB at Bayern.

The add-ons for Chillwell were reported at €5M. If Chillwell is a big success, does it really matter if the club have to pay a few million more to Leicester in a year or two? And if he doesn't come good, it's very likely the add-ons will never be paid.

27 minutes ago, killer1257 said:

All the other alternatives cost half the price of Chilwell. So very costly and high expectations for a guy that did not have a good last season. Also, we criticise Emerson and Alonso when Mahrez destroys them, but Chilwell gets destroyed by Mahrez too. I have also seen Lamptey destroying Chilwell. Moreover, he has been injured for two months now. So many reasons why we should stay away from Chilwell.

You keep bringing up the games against Mahrez and Lamptey. Don't you think you could find similarly bad games for literally any player on the planet? Reguilon was shit defensively just this week against Manchester United but I don't see many people constantly bringing that up, instead everyone just creams their pants over his goal assist in the game.

[Jase 43,479]

5 minutes ago, Jype said:

Yep, same here.

I'm not 100% sold on Chillwell's quality but all possible LB signings right now (Chillwell, Reguilon, Telles, Tagliafico) are gambles and at a much lower price than the £80M initially reported I'm more than happy with getting Chillwell if that's who Lampard really wants.

Surely Lampard and the rest of the coaching team have watched him extensively and know what they're getting to ask the club to commit that much funds for his signature. To say it's "English bias" is just lazy because Lamps has already gotten Werner, Ziyech and looking to get Havertz. He could easily have just gone for English alternative like Jack Grealish if being English mattered that much but it doesn't.

Thing is, around 50m seems to be the new normal market price for that kind of player.

For full-backs that price has been paid for Walker, Wan-Bissaka, B. Mendy, F. Mendy and Cancelo in the last couple years. As far as the fee is concerned it matters fuck all whether it's a LB or RB.

And Lucas Hernandez went for €80M too, although with Davies playing as well as he has Hernandez has played primarily CB at Bayern.

The add-ons for Chillwell were reported at €5M. If Chillwell is a big success, does it really matter if the club have to pay a few million more to Leicester in a year or two? And if he doesn't come good, it's very likely the add-ons will never be paid.

You keep bringing up the games against Mahrez and Lamptey. Don't you think you could find similarly bad games for literally any player on the planet? Reguilon was shit defensively just this week against Manchester United but I don't see many people constantly bringing that up, instead everyone just creams their pants over his goal assist in the game.

THANK YOU!

And don't ever leave again, Jype! 

[Jype 6,398]

Just now, Jason said:

And don't ever leave again, Jype! 

Hahah, I'll try to stay more active here.