Jump to content

Basel v Chelsea


Jase
 Share

Recommended Posts

I would change almost all the team, I think we can rest at least Oscar, Lampard and Ramires. We have a great team and this is not the more important game we have.

Even if we lose we have an easy game at home after this.

THe League is more important right now then the Champions League.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 536
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

buddy, West Ham we played 4-3-3. Its a formation I feel is our best, can we stop going around the mulberry bush now?

the only person going round and round is you, buddy. u r the only one talking in ifs and talking about things that might happen and could happen, while i am talking about things that are happening and are most probable for happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

buddy, West Ham we played 4-3-3. Its a formation I feel is our best, can we stop going around the mulberry bush now?

the only person going round and round is you, buddy. u r the only one talking in ifs and talking about things that might happen and could happen, while i am talking about things that are happening and are most probable for happening.

Lol isn't that the point of a forum to discuss ideas?

I know what's most likely gonna happen everyone does it hasn't changed much from the beginning of the season...

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was more 4-3-3 than 4-2-3-1.... Look at the heat zones. Why are we splitting hairs people? Football is a fluid game!

As Sebastien had said on twitter, a lopsided 4-2-3-1. I don't think you would call the formation we played against Schalke a 4-3-3. Calling it a 4-3-3 directly is a layman's term. Hugely different when you look at particular tactical duties. If you aren't going to call it 4-2-3-1, then 4-3-2-1 at best. Never a 4-3-3 when you have Eto'o drifting sideways to help Hazard make lateral runs and causing overloads in the middle with the help of Oscar.

Also in a 4-3-3, Lampard and Ramires wouldn't have to take up central positions. They were often seen covering up in Mikel's zone, with Mikel either higher up or acting as a cover for the CB's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Sebastien had said on twitter, a lopsided 4-2-3-1. I don't think you would call the formation we played against Schalke a 4-3-3. Calling it a 4-3-3 directly is a layman's term. Hugely different when you look at particular tactical duties. If you aren't going to call it 4-2-3-1, then 4-3-2-1 at best. Never a 4-3-3 when you have Eto'o drifting sideways to help Hazard make lateral runs and causing overloads in the middle with the help of Oscar.

Also in a 4-3-3, Lampard and Ramires wouldn't have to take up central positions. They were often seen covering up in Mikel's zone, with Mikel either higher up or acting as a cover for the CB's.

lol...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must be the biggest idiot on the planet, clearly you and sebastien got it right. LOL

Gives it away when he says 'getting the ball out of pressure zones' . You can't even do that when playing with wingers or interiores .

No one's calling you an idiot, or saying that what I or he said is the best opinion ever. Just clarifying the difference between roles in a 4-3-3 are, and the roles played by Mikel, Lampard and Ramires particularly are. Just cause those 3 drop deep doesn't really equate to a 4-3-3. a modern misconception.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gives it away when he says 'getting the ball out of pressure zones' . You can't even do that when playing with wingers or interiores .

No one's calling you an idiot, or saying that what I or he said is the best opinion ever. Just clarifying the difference between roles in a 4-3-3 are, and the roles played by Mikel, Lampard and Ramires particularly are. Just cause those 3 drop deep doesn't really equate to a 4-3-3. a modern misconception.

Anyways brother, there is another thread to discuss the finer points of the West Ham game.... You clearly saw that game completely differently than anyone not named Sebastien(who the hell is he anyway)?

Let's not derail this too much it is a huge game still.

I'd like to see the same formation as Saturdays with Mata in Oscar's role, I doubt it will be the case though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have felling that Jose will drop Lampard, Eto and Oscar.

Eto'o I feel is a definite but Lamps and Oscar... I don't know if we can take both players who scored on the weekend out in a game that means so much. Too much chopping and changing and you'll lose the cohesiveness of the unit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyways brother, there is another thread to discuss the finer points of the West Ham game.... You clearly saw that game completely differently than anyone not named Sebastien(who the hell is he anyway)?

Let's not derail this too much it is a huge game still.

I'd like to see the same formation as Saturdays with Mata in Oscar's role, I doubt it will be the case though.

Actually a lot of people did, but sadly none of them in this forum, expect Seb probably. Not derailing at all. I found the point over here, and was just trying to get across my view.

Nope. Don't think he can in Oscar's role. Ramires's role maybe yes, but definitely not Oscar's. Juan has no previous experience in rotating positions with two other midfielders. You need a bit of work-rate for that too. Maybe if he's adapted, then a slight yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You