Jump to content

Fernando Torres


 Share

Recommended Posts

but he isnt BULLIED ...

No but his first touch means he's unlikely to be bullied as the ball is lost.

He's WBA till Jan, but like I say hope he can do something for us as he is a beast - the guy looks like the Hulk...

In 2 years he will be unplayable, just hope he has Didiers knack of scoring Final goals :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He [benitez] will never be a Chelsea man. Don't care whether he lives to be 20 millions years old. We are here and he should go. Taxi's outside, he should get in there. [He] should probably take Torres with him because he ain't never gonna score a goal either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guy is done. Watching is guy play is cringeworthy. If I had a dollar for everytime this guy attempts to shoot at goal I'd be poor as fuck. I mean, I cannot wait until this cancer of a player leaves this club, all he's ever brought was trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@chelseafc Benitez: "Torres was trying very hard, he had a good chance, but the team has to create chances for him to score goals." #CFC

Is this guy serious? I mean wtf! Gettin Rafa really means that we will have to suffer with this shit least until the summer.

Rafa has literally no control over anything, if Roman decides to sell/demote Torres in January, Rafa is has about as much power to change things as i do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2. £150k a week - Anyone know how much we've given him in total? I'm actually terrified to find out.

[

Torres is on 170k a week *gulp*

Torres was actually abysmal against City. He was much worse than his own terrible standards, I still can't get over how bad he was. His movement was zero all game. That was what annoyed me the most. He was pïss poor on the ball as well, but at least if he had good movement it would be a bad performance and not atrocious. We need Sturridge back ASAP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Torres is on 170k a week *gulp*

Torres was actually abysmal against City. He was much worse than his own terrible standards, I still can't get over how bad he was. His movement was zero all game. That was what annoyed me the most. He was pïss poor on the ball as well, but at least if he had good movement it would be a bad performance and not atrocious. We need Sturridge back ASAP.

As if I wasn't annoyed enough...

Agree with your post completely though. At least when Studge was pushed up front he made runs. I'm not saying they were amazing runs, but they sure looked like it at the time; especially after seeing Torres up there for so long...he makes you forget what a striker is supposed to do/look like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...