Jump to content

Gary Cahill


LDN Blue
 Share

Recommended Posts

I read on Twitter that he was shite today again. Not going to judge though, but based on his form it wouldn't be surprising.

Also from Twitter: Cahill and Kompany would make a great defensive partnership for a Fraud XI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

We all know Cahill has been poor and is average, but would like to take a positive spin on things for a moment. His back heel flick goal was quite brilliant. Great improvisation.

yup defo was. Zola moment. Was clearly at fault for the 4th goal but did not really matter. Also Christensen was just ball-watching. The other were collective mistakes, everyone of our team completely out of position and missing the 2nd goal. Zouma , surprisingly, was not the saviour himslef as

Link to comment
Share on other sites

errors.png

I doubt - and my memory sucks, which is why I can't support my conviction with facts - he's made only one mistake that led to a goal in the league.

This data is created by computares, not people, so they have very specific criteria to define what an error would be. Cahill cost us more than one goal in the league, that I'm sure of. Still my initial point stood, we don't even have another Chelsea player (the first picture I quoted was only in the Chelsea team) in the screen and he's among the leaders in the league in terms of errors - leading to goal or not.

thanks for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt - and my memory sucks, which is why I can't support my conviction with facts - he's made only one mistake that led to a goal in the league.

This data is created by computares, not people, so they have very specific criteria to define what an error would be. Cahill cost us more than one goal in the league, that I'm sure of. Still my initial point stood, we don't even have another Chelsea player (the first picture I quoted was only in the Chelsea team) in the screen and he's among the leaders in the league in terms of errors - leading to goal or not.

thanks for that.

I highly doubt only one of his defensive mistakes has resulted in a goal. Off the top of my head, he gave away a penalty against Spurs and scuffed a clearance against newcastle at SJP. Already that's two defensive errors that lead to goals and I'm sure if we were to examine the goals we've conceded we'll find more.

The whole 'errors leading to a goal' stat is one of the most useless football stats. Not only is the criteria of what constitute an error very rigid but there're so many factors that prevents a defenders errors from being costly. A goalkeeper might make an outstanding save that prevents an error from resulting into a goal. Or another player might step in and bail the defender out. So what exactly is the point of the stat? If anything, the fact that Cahill has made 4 defensive errors and only one of them has resulted in a goal (according to these statistics) is more a reflection of the goalkeeper and other defenders than Cahill himself. What these stats show me is that other players are having to cover for Cahill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Curious to know what is Squawka's definition of 'Defensive Errors'. It feels almost nonsense that Ivanovic is not high on that list.

All these football stat sites are near useless for evaluating defensive players (or defensive play in general for that matter). They only take clearances/tackles/interceptions (etc.) into account, and have no real way of measuring if a defender is a good man-marker, is good at cutting off passing lanes, is able to help maintain a good defensive line, or if they have good levels of concentration more generally. Defenders that score well in the former categories will frequently do so BECAUSE they are poor at marking and positional play, or otherwise because they are simply exposed all the time due to playing in a team with huge systemic defensive problems.

Unsurprisingly, given the above, their definition of a 'defensive error' is very narrow, and only includes things like passes to opposition players, failed clearances etc; they do not count poor man-marking/positioning/decision-making as being 'errors' because they are not purely objective measurements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone should make a similar video for Ivanovic. Aside from all the half-hearted closing down and running back to position, his lapses in concentration have probably proven the most costly. Off the top of my head I can think of these recent examples:

  • Sunderland in our last encounter (can't remember exact chance but was near the end)
  • Denmark equaliser v Serbia (Euro 2016 qualifier)
  • Lampard goal (away to City)
  • Maribor empty net chance (away)
  • Arda Turan goal (Atletico Madrid at home)
  • Salah goal (away to Basel)

Anyone think of any more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You