Frank Lampard

[zolayes 14,489]

meltdown on here should come soon

[Fulham Broadway 16,393]

Thats it I am burning my lampard shirt, pants, and Frankie Doll Mask and making a ''Fuck Off Fat Frank You Judas'' banner out of a stained bedsheet for the return fixture

[Fernando 6,376]

Manchester City have extended Frank Lampard's loan deal from New York City FC.

The former Chelsea superstar - who scored against his old club in a 1-1 draw at the weekend - will now remain at the Etihad until February before beginning his MLS career.

By extending his loan stay with the Premier League champions beyond the original date of the end of 2014, Lampard will now potentially be able to face his old club once again: the two sides meet again in the league on January 31st.

[Term-X 7,891]

He's a professional and has to do his job.

Like Batistuta scoring against his loved fiorentina or Mourinho knocking us out of the CL.

Yet bati and Mourinho are still loved by their respective fans.

No difference here.

There is a MASSIVE difference.

Lampard said he wouldn't move to another English club, when he signed for City.. he said he won't play against Chelsea. I can't remember Mourinho saying he wouldn't manage another football club ever again when he left, or maybe I missed that quote.

Not that Mourinho is comparable, Lampard is an icon here/personification of the club, Jose doesn't compare.. yet.

[Dion 2,476]

There is a MASSIVE difference.

Lampard said he wouldn't move to another English club, when he signed for City.. he said he won't play against Chelsea. I can't remember Mourinho saying he wouldn't manage another football club ever again when he left, or maybe I missed that quote.

Not that Mourinho is comparable, Lampard is an icon here/personification of the club, Jose doesn't compare.. yet.

Besides, Lampard has a stronger connection to Chelsea than Mourinho.

Edit: Oh, that edit before I quoted.

[RoyalBlues 4,050]

Manchester City have extended Frank Lampard's loan deal from New York City FC.

The former Chelsea superstar - who scored against his old club in a 1-1 draw at the weekend - will now remain at the Etihad until February before beginning his MLS career.

By extending his loan stay with the Premier League champions beyond the original date of the end of 2014, Lampard will now potentially be able to face his old club once again: the two sides meet again in the league on January 31st.

Wooo, that's predictable from c*** Pelle. Bring it on, b****, we will serve you right at the Bridge.

[Fernando 6,376]

There is a MASSIVE difference.

Lampard said he wouldn't move to another English club, when he signed for City.. he said he won't play against Chelsea. I can't remember Mourinho saying he wouldn't manage another football club ever again when he left, or maybe I missed that quote.

Not that Mourinho is comparable, Lampard is an icon here/personification of the club, Jose doesn't compare.. yet.

Well he didn't move to another English club, he moved to the MLS.

It was not sure that City would do such a thing back then.

Now that we know, I bet you people will be more cautious about joining NYCFC.

But even if he was to moved to another club from the same league it makes no difference.

It was the same case with Batitusta. Man was an idol for Fiorentina, and where he moved to? Roma.

When he scored the goal against his beloved Fiorentina he cried.

So again not the first time and won't be the last.

Just that people like you want to make a big scene about everything.

Like that time you called Mourinho a traitor because you thought he was going to United....

[Thendo 1,088]

When does the mls season start? Wasn't he just supposed to stay til January and then join up with the New york city pre season? Seems very odd that he would stay with man city when he can train with New york? Cant understand why he would do that...

[Term-X 7,891]

Well he didn't move to another English club, he moved to the MLS.

It was not sure that City would do such a thing back then.

Now that we know, I bet you people will be more cautious about joining NYCFC.

But even if he he was to moved to another club from the same league, it was the same with Batitusta. Man was an idol for Fiorentina, and where he moved to? Roma.

When he scored the goal against his beloved Fiorentina, he cried.

So again, not the first time and won't be the last.

Just that people like you want to make a big scene about everything.

As that time you called Mourinho a traitor because you thought he was going to United....

So you are assuming Frank Lampard is an idiot then, NYC did not exist when he signed for them, he will have known EXACTLY what was going to happen.

Did Batistuta say he would never join another italian rival?, or italian club?, did he say he wouldn't play against Fiorentina?, if not.. then it's the opposite to the Lampard situation.

[RoyalBlues 4,050]

Who knows, if we or they going through at cup competitions, Chelsea vs City match might be rearranged

[Fernando 6,376]

So you are assuming Frank Lampard is an idiot then, NYC did not exist when he signed for them, he will have known EXACTLY what was going to happen.

Did Batitusta say he would never join another italian rival?, or italian club?, did he say he wouldn't play against Fiorentina?, if not.. then it's the opposite to the Lampard situation.

Batitusta joined Roma from Fiorentina.

Lampard joined NYCFC.

He is on loan to City, so he did not signed for City.

And yes, I don't think most people would have been cleared with the whole NYCFC to City connection.

Now that it's laid bare in front of our eyes we know.

[Term-X 7,891]

When does the mls season start? Wasn't he just supposed to stay til January and then join up with the New york city pre season? Seems very odd that he would stay with man city when he can train with New york? Cant understand why he would do that...

Because he wants to score against us at the Bridge, and with Pellegrino's hatred for Jose.. he'll probably start this time.

[RoyalBlues 4,050]

Hope we draw against City at home in cup competitions.

[Term-X 7,891]

Batitusta joined Roma from Fiorentina.

Lampard joined NYCFC.

He is on loan to City, so he did not signed for City.

And yes, I don't think most people would have been cleared with the whole NYCFC to City connection.

Now that it's laid bare in front of our eyes we know.

NYC did not exist, Lampard signed with Man-City corp, he's not an idiot.. he knows how to read contracts, he will have known the minute he signed the deal. And that doesn't excuse the fact he said he wouldn't play against us, when it was declared.

Completely different to the Batitusta situation, unless you have quotes and promises from him similar to what Lamps said.

[Fernando 6,376]

NYC did not exist, Lampard signed with Man-City corp, he's not an idiot.. he knows how to read contracts, he will have known the minute he signed the deal. And that doesn't excuse the fact he said he wouldn't play against us, when it was declared.

Completely different to the Batitusta situation, unless you have quotes and promises from him similar to what Lamps said.

That's your assumption, like you thought Mourinho was going to United....

[Thendo 1,088]

Because he wants to score against us at the Bridge, and with Pellegrino's hatred for Jose.. he'll probably start this time.

Would hope so as that would be beneficial for us, but would be silly by Pellegrini to do that only to try to annoy us.

But still don't understand this, as they will need to buy a new midfielder come january anyway, since Lamps is off in february.

[Term-X 7,891]

Jose looked genuinely gutted about the whole affair, when reporters were asking him about Lampard. Pellegrino knows where to stick the knife now, this is a psychological battle as well as it is football.

[Spike 12,049]

That's your assumption, like you thought Mourinho was going to United....

Most of the arguments here are based on assumptions or personal interpretations.