Jump to content

Non-Chelsea Transfer Pub


Hamilton
 Share

Recommended Posts

Well Arsenal suck as much as Slippery G's team... I think L'Arse need more than Sanchez...

It's a tough one - but on the balance of probability - I would prefer Arse with Sanchez than Pool with Suarez... Thoughts?

I'd rather he goes Arsenal to be honest. No logical reason behind it, just something about seeing the scum upset :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rumor has it that Chelsea has actually made an offer of around 17M Euros for 25-year-old Charles Aranguiz from Chile, but until we have more info it might just be agents doing their thing.

Interesting if true... strength in depth for the CM position... would suggest a system change IMO (to 4-3-3/451).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What? Debuchy is fine fullback. One of best in PL and did well in WC. But still surprised they havent bought Aurier after all those rumours and good WC games.

He's not even better than Sagna who he'd be replacing. Good player but not an elite player.

That being said, if Arse manage to get Debuchy, Sanchez, a striker, and a decent DM then they should be right up there challenging for the title. At least until their annual injury epidemic or collapse.

----------Giroud----------

Alexis----Özil----Walcott

---Ramsey---New DM---

Gibbs-Kosielny-Mert-Debuchy

-----------Szszsz------------

That's a pretty nice XI. Still fancy ourselves and City over that, though. Looks like a normal Arse side that'll be bullied by more athletic and physical sides. A side much like last seasons where they'll steam roll the small teams and lose most of the big matches. Alexis would be a genuinely excellent signing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What? Debuchy is fine fullback. One of best in PL and did well in WC. But still surprised they havent bought Aurier after all those rumours and good WC games.

coleman, iva, zabaleta, sagna, clyne.

5 right backs were EASILY better than debuchy last season, so how was he one of the best?

the worst thing is that he is not even as good as the player he is replacing (sagna) in an already weak back line which just makes it an even poorer transfer. but well what can one expect from arsenal. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait, £20m for Lovren?! Wow, are those scousers really that stupid?

He was one of the best defenders in the league lasts season. The only reason the valuation might be questioned is because he hasn't proven he's not just a one season wonder otherwise if he carries his form into the new season then that £20m will be a mighty bargain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How much is a 25yo Croatian int'l and one of the best defenders in the league last season worth then? There's absolutely nothing outrageous about that. £50m for Luiz, £35 m for Andy carroll are what I call outrageous and not this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You