Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and log in to join the CFC discussion! ×

Deadline Day!

J.F.

By J.F.,
in Transfer Archives

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

YouNameIt

YouNameIt 1,511

Posted
Posted

Now I read Lukaku is only 20 year old, so what ?

This kid has monumental potential & should be given a chance to play for Chelsea as Jose promised.

There were many players at his age, performed miracles too. So why not him ?

What fucking Everton is going to offer him ?

MORE FUCKING PLAYTIME.

Why can you not understand that?

Eto is here now, we have Torres, and if we are unable to get rid of Ba in a good way, we will be stuck with 4 strikers. That would be fucking dumb and it would mean Lukaku would sit on the bench too much.

1+1 = 2. Do you understand now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rmpr

Rmpr 8,977

Posted
Posted

No, it really isn't. Third strikers basically never play in a 1 striker systems and teams that play with 1 striker, don't carry three people who are really only suited for the #9 (or rather, they often do, but the third is either a 19 YO or somebody they don't care about). Arsenal had one striker last season (and used midfielder/wingers like Walcott, Gervinho, and Podolski there Spurs had 2. We had 2. That's the normal number for 1 striker systems. The reason we needed a 3rd striker last season was because our top option sucked, we played a record number of games, Sturridge wasn't trusted as a striker and then was sold, and Ba was European cup tied. We didn't need a third striker, we needed a #1 striker. Mourinho clearly trusts Schurrle to play as a striker, so if he has to start 5-10 games, we'd be fine. The third option at any position is almost never going to play

Dude, I am not in the mood for tactical discussions, but we do need 3 strikers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TorontoChelsea

TorontoChelsea 4,064

Posted
Posted

Yes but what I don't get is why Torres is staying while Lukaku, who had a brilliant season last year and was one of our best players in pre-season, is being shipped out? Poor man management from whoever is in charge if that happens.

Lukaku missed a penalty against Bayern, big fucking deal. Torres has been shit for three years, why does he get to stay ahead of RL?

I don't think anyone cares about the penalty. We can't get rid of Torres though so he stays. Also, we don't need to develop him so the only purpose of going on loan would be to get his wages off the books. I'd actually rather loan out Lukaku and see him develop his game more than see him get 6 starts with us. It looks like it will be Eto'o, Torres, and Ba and Lukaku will get more playing time elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You

Sure, let me in!
Enter