nadavTKL 1,787 Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 lol 99.9999% of the girls doesnt get any fitness from their military period...im a guy for example and im doing my service right now and i dont do anything besides seating on a chair. like most girls.anyway you're absolutly right, too many beautiful girls in Tel Aviv... i didnt get what you meant about religion, but anyway Tel Aviv is the most non-religious city in israel. by far. robsblubot 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robsblubot 3,595 Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 lol 99.9999% of the girls doesnt get any fitness from their military period...im a guy for example and im doing my service right now and i dont do anything besides seating on a chair. like most girls.anyway you're absolutly right, too many beautiful girls in Tel Aviv... i didnt get what you meant about religion, but anyway Tel Aviv is the most non-religious city in israel. by far.heh fair enough, just in comparison to what I see here in the US... Bsides, girls in uniform... ! Some very pretty girls here too if you know where to look (despite what you may have heard).Yeah, worked for an Israeli company for many years and most of the Israeli I met couldn't care less about religion; just in someone thought I had any agenda one way or another. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barbara 15,149 Posted July 5, 2013 Share Posted July 5, 2013 I used the image in an article, but I suppose not everyone reads those, so I'm posting the charts in the players' thread for those who might be interested. The green and blue correspond the players's movement without the ball, the yellow corresponds to tackles, interceptions and prompt passes and the red ball possession Mustafa and Despiadado.Maleante 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustafa 885 Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwTEV0-F2zUHe's different class !! Dy-lan and Bir_CFC 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yuvala 2,167 Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwTEV0-F2zUHe's different class !!Brilliant mate! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted July 9, 2013 Share Posted July 9, 2013 Mirror reporting that he is close (again) to signing a contract extension till 2018 that will double his salary to 100k/wk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted July 9, 2013 Share Posted July 9, 2013 Mirror reporting that he is close (again) to signing a contract extension till 2018 that will double his salary to 100k/wk.To go along with that...Chelsea's Juan Mata and Fernando Torres told to ignore transfer gossip in personal calls from Mourinho Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chelsea? 892 Posted July 11, 2013 Share Posted July 11, 2013 Mata should be demanding close to 170k Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beepu 1,714 Posted July 11, 2013 Share Posted July 11, 2013 Mata should be demanding close to 170kMaybe in 2016 where he will be extending his contract the second time until 2020 Chelsea? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mufassir08 2,400 Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 On mata and 4-3-3http://www.weaintgotnohistory.com/2013/7/14/4521832/juan-mata-analysis-4-3-3?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook kellzfresh 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 On mata and 4-3-3http://www.weaintgotnohistory.com/2013/7/14/4521832/juan-mata-analysis-4-3-3?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebookMata had a lot of sub-par performances in 4-3-3 under AVB. Being better than Malouda and Kalou at that time is not really saying much. And for all his offensive brilliance, Mata was one of the reasons AVB's pressing tactics did not work out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TorontoChelsea 4,064 Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 Mata had a lot of sub-par performances in 4-3-3 under AVB. Being better than Malouda and Kalou at that time is not really saying much. And for all his offensive brilliance, Mata was one of the reasons AVB's pressing tactics did not work out. It's an interesting thing because one of the reasons I thought Mourinho wouldn't come back here is having a team built around Mata. Everything that Mourinho generally loves, counter-attacking, defensive solidity, quick movement, Mata is not. What Mata has is incredible vision, an excellent touch, and is a good finisher. Whereas Ramires strikes me as a perfect Mourinho sort of player, Mata doesn't seem to fit. Of course, Mourinho could always adapt his style to fit Mata better because he is our best player. It will be very interesting to see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 It's an interesting thing because one of the reasons I thought Mourinho wouldn't come back here is having a team built around Mata. Everything that Mourinho generally loves, counter-attacking, defensive solidity, quick movement, Mata is not. What Mata has is incredible vision, an excellent touch, and is a good finisher. Whereas Ramires strikes me as a perfect Mourinho sort of player, Mata doesn't seem to fit. Of course, Mourinho could always adapt his style to fit Mata better because he is our best player. It will be very interesting to see. I think there will be plenty of bumps in the road for Jose in terms of team selection next season. There will be times where he will bench Mata or Hazard. As much as Jose's return felt like a fairy tale for Chelsea fans, we should keep in mind that there is no such thing as "and they lived happily ever after" in football. Stingray 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stingray 9,441 Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 I think there will be plenty of bumps in the road for Jose in terms of team selection next season. There will be times where he will bench Mata or Hazard. As much as Jose's return felt like a fairy tale for Chelsea fans, we should keep in mind that there is no such thing as "and they lived happily ever after" in football.There never is. Whatever the topic. I think we will adapt. I don't think Mou is one -dimensional at all, actually. Duppy Conqueror and The Skipper 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 There never is. Whatever the topic.I think we will adapt. I don't think Mou is one -dimensional at all, actually.Hopefully we will, but it will take some time as well as a few failed attempts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Armour 4,439 Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 It's an interesting thing because one of the reasons I thought Mourinho wouldn't come back here is having a team built around Mata. Everything that Mourinho generally loves, counter-attacking, defensive solidity, quick movement, Mata is not. What Mata has is incredible vision, an excellent touch, and is a good finisher. Whereas Ramires strikes me as a perfect Mourinho sort of player, Mata doesn't seem to fit. Of course, Mourinho could always adapt his style to fit Mata better because he is our best player. It will be very interesting to see. I don't think its exactly a case of having a "Mourinho-type" of player. I think he would definitely like his squad to have good options and someone who has incredible vision, an excellent touch and a good finish would definitely figure into his plans in some form. From what he has said in the press, he'll be creating a new identity for his Chelsea team and I wouldn't be surprised if Mata became an integral part of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! Magic Lamps 11,692 Posted July 14, 2013 Popular Post! Share Posted July 14, 2013 van Ginkel, Schürrle...we do not sign those players to play 4-2-3-1. We will surely be returning to 4-3-3 at some point. It may not fit Mata, but it does fit Ramires, Lamps, KDB, MvG, Mikel better, which in the end is more important. Our best player is not Mata, it is Hazard. Technically he is just as good as Mata but much faster and younger. His as well as Oscar's ceiling is much higher than Mata's. Even though Juan Mata is a brilliant little player, we can and should do better in terms of star man. Mata is a worldclass player, but he won't get any better, Hazard is the future. Hazard has ability to impose himself on any opposition with his speed, Mata will always go missing against strong defenses like Bayern, City, Real, juve. The Mak, Peace., Barbara and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TorontoChelsea 4,064 Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 I don't think its exactly a case of having a "Mourinho-type" of player. I think he would definitely like his squad to have good options and someone who has incredible vision, an excellent touch and a good finish would definitely figure into his plans in some form. From what he has said in the press, he'll be creating a new identity for his Chelsea team and I wouldn't be surprised if Mata became an integral part of it.It's possible for sure, maybe even likely but I can also envision a side where Mata is not as important. To be fair, he's shouldered too much of the load anyway and a more balanced attack (especially more width and better production from strikers) would be most welcome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! Jase 43,479 Posted July 14, 2013 Popular Post! Share Posted July 14, 2013 van Ginkel, Schürrle...we do not sign those players to play 4-2-3-1. We will surely be returning to 4-3-3 at some point. It may not fit Mata, but it does fit Ramires, Lamps, KDB, MvG, Mikel better, which in the end is more important.No. We did not sign those players only to play in 4-2-3-1 but to be able to play various formations as Mourinho has indicated that with the signing of Schurrle. What we've basically got now is a squad that is versatile and adaptable to play in more than 1 formation and right now, we can't tell what is Jose preferred formation but we will certainly switch between a few throughout the season. Seems rather silly to say we will be returning to 4-3-3 at some point because it fits Ramires, Lampard, KDB, MvG, Mikel etc. Can agree with the former two but KDB, MvG and Mikel?! We don't even know how KDB and MvG have fitted in yet and you just jumped the gun saying they work best in 4-3-3. Similar case for Mikel. He might not have had the best time playing in a 4-2-3-1 so far but it might help him if he were to actually play beside a reliable and solid midfielder in the pivot.Our best player is not Mata, it is Hazard. Technically he is just as good as Mata but much faster and younger. His as well as Oscar's ceiling is much higher than Mata's. Even though Juan Mata is a brilliant little player, we can and should do better in terms of star man. Mata is a worldclass player, but he won't get any better, Hazard is the future. Hazard has ability to impose himself on any opposition with his speed, Mata will always go missing against strong defenses like Bayern, City, Real, juve.Not denying that Mata has his weaknesses defensively and off the ball (which he can definitely work on) but there is so much more to the issue of him going missing against Bayern, City, Juventus etc... Stingray, ZOS, Mustafa and 4 others 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustafa 885 Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 Mata isnt going nowhere lads...And to think some people think he cant play 4-3-3 is just absurd ! Valencia played that formation and he played under AVB with that formation...Dont see why anybody would want to sell a player who pretty much carried Chelsea last season along with Hazard ZOS 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.