Romelu Lukaku

[bushman 2,043]

Lukaku possesses a fearsome pace, physicality of any striker & great finishing touch,one of the best strikers to ever play at Chelsea. Hence he was moved out because Jose sanctioned it.

Some say, he is too young, too raw. Meanwhile, Hazard, Oscar & Schurrle are used in the starting line-up.

I believe, Lukaku is being held up in his progress instead of giving an opportunity to play for the club he loves.

Perhaps, at Everton Lukaku may refine his game. We need to wait. I just hope, he won´t get fed up with Chelsea & ask to move, next year.

[The Skipper 20,593]

Lukaku possesses a fearsome pace, physicality of any striker & great finishing touch,one of the best strikers to ever play at Chelsea

What are you smoking?

Yeah, he has the potential to be a great player for us but he hasn't been one of the best strikers to ever play for this club.

[bushman 2,043]

What are you smoking?

Yeah, he has the potential to be a great player for us but he hasn't been one of the best strikers to ever play for this club.

some say, the same stuff as you ?

His ability tells me, he is one of the best I ever seen at Chelsea. Potential to be better than Drogba. I hope, you agree.

[hjperdeath 2,226]

^ :lol2:

[TrippingStep 336]

some say, the same stuff as you ?

His ability tells me, he is one of the best I ever seen at Chelsea. Potential to be better than Drogba. I hope, you agree.

You're wrong.

Have you watched WBA matches last year?

Or just because he talks big, you think he's a misunderstood talent.

Ask yourself why if he's such a talent, why no big clubs don't try to have him?

[The Mak 4,459]

Lukaku possesses a fearsome pace, physicality of any striker & great finishing touch,one of the best strikers to ever play at Chelsea.

His ability tells me, he is one of the best I ever seen at Chelsea. Potential to be better than Drogba. I hope, you agree.

Hasn't scored one goal at Chelsea = One of the best Chelsea strikers ever

......?

[edenhazard17 281]

MOURINHO ON SUMMER MOVES

http://www.chelseafc.com/news-article/article/3447451

The manager was specifically referring to Moses and Lukaku, two he said the club would have been 'more than happy to keep' in this season's squad but decided with an eye on the long-term for both Chelsea and the two attackers, it is better for them to go on loan to Liverpool and Everton respectively.

On the subject of gaining regular playing time, Mourinho said: 'It is important for Lukaku.

'We have Samuel Eto'o, Fernando Torres and Demba Ba, and of course he would have had chances to play but another thing is to play basically every weekend.

'He had [possible] clubs, he had options and he made that decision, I have to respect that decision and hopefully it goes well for him and it goes well for everyone.'

'It is time for every one of us to think about the competitions and to think about the improvement of our players, and to stop thinking about selling and buying and who is coming and who is leaving,' Mourinho told Chelsea TV following the end of the transfer window.

Well said.

[bushman 2,043]

Hasn't scored one goal at Chelsea = One of the best Chelsea strikers ever

......?

A great future, for Lukaku lies ahead, potentially the best...?

[bushman 2,043]

You're wrong.

Have you watched WBA matches last year?

Or just because he talks big, you think he's a misunderstood talent.

Ask yourself why if he's such a talent, why no big clubs don't try to have him?

What clubs would not buy him ?

Take your time to think it over.

[GermanBlue 82]

A great future, for Lukaku lies ahead, potentially the best...?

There's a difference between potential and reality. I agree that he could be one of the best strikers to ever play for Chelsea. No one knows that, but to say that now when he hasn't even scored for us is way too early.

[Jose M 140]

According to Jos'e it was Lukaku and his representatives that wanted the move on loan so he could play minutes all season. Great move for his development. We have goals throughout whole team in Ivanovic,Lampard,Oscar,Eden and hopefully Eto. We hopefully wont miss him this season or it will be the 3rd season in a row we have loaned out a striker who has out scored our own.

[The_Flash 1,144]

Yeah i heard Jose kind of imply on tv that it was Lukaku who wanted the loan? who knows

[NiclasCFC 2,582]

This cant be true....

Romelu Lukaku on his move to Everton:

"Eto'o joining us didn't influence my decision because I was already behind Fernando Torres in the pecking order anyway."

[Stingray 9,441]

the source of a lot of confusion: The opinion on the lukaku saga can differ if you adress 1) is it good for Lukaku 2) is it good for Chelsea now

I say 1) yes

I say 2) no, we weakened our attack (or narrowed down the options)

I am frustrated as fuck a lot do not seem to discern between those two and then attack - including the 'belgian' remarks that have been going on repeat for weeks ....

[Jose M 140]

Dont know if anyone has posted this yet:

Mirallas: I was in Lukaku's room on Monday and only left when he was joining Everton

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2410967/Evertons-Kevin-Mirallas-said-helped-Romelu-Lukaku-decide-join.html#ixzz2dvCCxhr8

[BleedsBlue 1,549]

Lukaku never wanted a loan move as there was never any such option as he was guaranteed first team action by the manager.Unfortunately,we could not send Ba out so Jose chose to stick with the experience of Ba instead of Lukaku.

[CHOULO19 24,332]

This cant be true....

Romelu Lukaku on his move to Everton:

"Eto'o joining us didn't influence my decision because I was already behind Fernando Torres in the pecking order anyway."

What can't be true? That Lukaku was behind Torres in the pecking order? I think that was pretty obvious in the first 4 games.

[bushman 2,043]

Pecking order here, Lukaku there...the kid was told by Jose. Listen boy, you are great, I am giving an opportunity to play, but at Everton.