J.F. 1,484 Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 kalou is hazard for walcott Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kojo 4,676 Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 Walcott is a decent player, i wouldn't say no. However if we can't benefit him enough on counter attacks and use his pace as an advantage then it's pretty pointless even getting him.Arsenal fans are stupid, they want players like him gone and don't appreciate how much they do for their system and how vital they are to the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluesman2610 1,423 Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 We need a reliable 2nd option to Torres, and i don't see Walcott as that. Would you start Walcott as striker away at Man utd? or Man city? you are right i would not but again he wouldn't be seen as our be all end all i just think we need more strength in other areas and he could do a job until june.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mufassir08 2,400 Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 I think he will be a good option against tiring defenders plus he is very effective as a winger as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marvin123 539 Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 @GetFootballNews: Theo Walcott is 5/4 to move to Chelsea in January. #CFC #AFC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 Decent option, final year of his contract, should be able to get a deal under £10million. But I hope we're adding more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marvin123 539 Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 Agreed wouldn't mind him in the squadBut definatley only if we add a striker too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheva. 5,373 Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 Only if he's going to play on the wings (in place of Moses). I don't buy this ridiculous idea that he can be a good striker, he's no Henry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cadenza666 221 Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 Villa and Walcott this window would just be about perfect, atleast for the short term Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underdrog 18 Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 who is better - moses or walcot ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kellzfresh 7,229 Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 who is better - moses or walcot ?Moses is stronger, can jump better and probably is a better dribbler.Walcot is faster, can finish far better, is english(home grown) He's scored ten goals this season and moses is going to the african cup of nations.. Walcott would make arsenal fans cry if he comes here!!Sign him up!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
╫rue Blue 47 Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 moses still categorised as homegrown too, if im not mistaken ?i dont really understand, the reason why we interestfor winger , we have marin , who still rare playingand marin and walcott i think not much different type player ? so what makes him better ? except the epl experience maybefor backup striker ?, walcott absolutely not the option Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spike 12,049 Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 Moses is stronger, can jump better and probably is a better dribbler.Walcot is faster, can finish far better, is english(home grown)He's scored ten goals this season and moses is going to the african cup of nations.. Walcott would make arsenal fans cry if he comes here!!Sign him up!!Moses is homegrown also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backstreet09 499 Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 We really need quality wingers , who can play more direct and can deliver quality crosses from the flanks , Walcott would be a valuable addition imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mufassir08 2,400 Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 We really need quality wingers , who can play more direct and can deliver quality crosses from the flanks , Walcott would be a valuable addition imo I do agree with that i think walcott is a better crosser of the ball then moses and his finishing is also good.He would be a great option to have on the bench running at tired full backs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hutcho 8,443 Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 Hate to be picky but this is listed as a wishlist transfer when we are strongly linked to him so it's actually been rumoured... But not that I really care. Got I like the idea of Walcott running at people late on in the game, but he has said he wants to play striker and Danny was never really given a chance there so I doubt they would. But still if the fee is 10 mil or so though it wouldn't be a bad signing as his pace is something else and he is still only 23 so can get better and would still have a resale value... It would be good business I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nadavTKL 1,787 Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 Can someone explain to me why we need Walcott when we have Moses, Hazard, Mata, Oscar, Marin and KDB on loan?I get he's fast, but we shoulnt play with such limited player. Moses and Hazard can cross too, dont need to bring this 'okay' player for this. Why bring him when we have Moses on RW? and marin to come of the bench?! it doesnt make any sense. Especially when in Arsenal he isnt a regular starter, and its Arsenal, a team which we shouldnt even look at. Walcott is just another over hyped English player, it amazes me that this all forum wants him. I guess its the English members who got everyone to think he's that good... no offence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 Walcot is faster, can finish far better, is english(home grown) Walcott had some pretty well taken goals this season, but he is a notoriously terrible finisher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mufassir08 2,400 Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 Walcott had some pretty well taken goals this season, but he is a notoriously terrible finisher. He has improved his finishing a lot and is normally a very reliable finisher from 1v1's situations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kellzfresh 7,229 Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 Walcott had some pretty well taken goals this season, but he is a notoriously terrible finisher. He developed his finishing this season, I think 10 goals this season. At least he would be an extra player in the team that can put the ball at the back of the net. Oscar, hazard and moses all lack this or are not frequent enough. Moses is homegrown also.Ooops I forgot. But we need a new home grown player to replace sturridge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts