David Villa

[Backstreet09 499]

MUCH BETTER BUY THAN FALCAO #FACT

[Rmpr 8,977]

MUCH BETTER BUY THAN FALCAO #FACT

TORRES >>> VILLA >>>> FALCAO

RIGHT???

[BlueLyon 9,359]

If you think we will get old Villa for peanuts, you are wrong...He was injured in december 2011 and hasnt played bigger match ever since. Sanchez and Pedro are getting chance ahead of him, despite he is fit since summer now. If he was that great, he would make return and be a starter now. Obviously, he is getting old and his speed played huge part in scoring goals for him. Yes, clinical finishing and ball control is still there, but I doubt he can play regulary in PL all in sudden. For the rest of season on loan (if Falcao, Lewan, Cavani, Llorente) arent available, he would be great. But in summer, we should go after younger striker.

Also yes, this is becoming Torres fc. He is shit for past two years and he wasnt sold just because of his price tag. Because of him, we didnt sign proper striker in summer and we didnt gave chance to Danny. However, he scored 7 goals in last 6 matches, maybe he will actualy start scoring in bigger matches....

[Milan 17,955]

TORRES >>> VILLA >>>> FALCAO

RIGHT???

I've never been goood at maths but even I can tell this is so wrong lol

[Backstreet09 499]

TORRES >>> VILLA >>>> FALCAO

RIGHT???

Well Torres has 100 goals in the most competitive league in the world , how many they have ?

[Backstreet09 499]

Also yes, this is becoming Torres fc. He is shit for past two years and he wasnt sold just because of his price tag. Because of him, we didnt sign proper striker in summer and we didnt gave chance to Danny. However, he scored 7 goals in last 6 matches, maybe he will actualy start scoring in bigger matches....

Well atleast it is moving from being DROGBA FC , we are playing more direct and it's paying off

[Rmpr 8,977]

Well Torres has 100 goals in the most competitive league in the world , how many they have ?

Oh man!

Just accept a good joke and move on. Wont turn this into another boring Torres vs The World topic...

[Backstreet09 499]

Oh man!

Just accept a good joke and move on. Wont turn this into another boring Torres vs The World topic...

Was that a joke ? haha sorry , forgot to laugh

[Sheva. 5,373]

1.Then why are we signing the only player in the universe who has played successfully with Torres in attack ?

2.Why don't we go for a player who can effectivelly challenge our precious no. 9 for the CF spot ?

3.Why are we buying a striker who will obviously be nothing but a squad player, yet we need someone to knock the blondie out of the starting 11 ?

4.Why is Chelsea trying to get their rivals' reject, a 31-year-old striker who hasn't played a proper match in almost 18 months and suffered a very serious injury ?

5.If you think this does not concern Torres, you don't have a clue about football.

6.Come January Torres is gonna stay, but they will give a nice fuck off to Lamps and Ash. Bravo !

1. Why are Liverpool and Arsenal after him? Because he's unhappy and will strengthen their attack, same applies to Chelsea.

2 and 3. Villa can challenge Torres for the CF spot and put him on the bench.

4. If we don't have many other options then you can't blame them for settling for a 'reject'. Throughout this time i thought if we didn't get Falcao we could at least get Bony, but then i remembered about ACN and his involvement will mean we only have 1 striker till February. So Villa actually makes sense, because there really isn't that many options in January.

5. I think this does not concern Torres. This is about strengthening our attack. Only people obsessed with Fernando think every fucking thing Chelsea do is somehow related to him.

If we sign Llorente, it must be because his name is also Fernando and he's Spanish just like Torres, smh.

6. Of course Torres is going to stay, he's not the one with 6 months left on his contract.

[nadavTKL 1,787]

Are there any reliable sources reporting this story?

[The Mak 4,459]

Well Torres has 100 goals in the most competitive league in the world , how many they have ?

Trust the Torres fanboy to make stupid comparisons. But there are some comparisons in case you've overlooked them: Villa has almost twice the amount of goals for Spain, in less games; Falcao too, in one season at Atletico, has scored nearly double than any of Torres' seasons there.

Just for your information...

[Bosnian Blue 2,471]

1. Why are Liverpool and Arsenal after him? Because he's unhappy and will strengthen their attack, same applies to Chelsea.

2 and 3. Villa can challenge Torres for the CF spot and put him on the bench.

4. If we don't have many other options then you can't blame them for settling for a 'reject'. Throughout this time i thought if we didn't get Falcao we could at least get Bony, but then i remembered about ACN and his involvement will mean we only have 1 striker till February. So Villa actually makes sense, because there really isn't that many options in January.

5. I think this does not concern Torres. This is about strengthening our attack. Only people obsessed with Fernando think every fucking thing Chelsea do is somehow related to him.

If we sign Llorente, it must be because his name is also Fernando and he's Spanish just like Torres, smh.

6. Of course Torres is going to stay, he's not the one with 6 months left on his contract.

Haha, that last answer showed you did not understand a word out of my post.

[BlueLion. 21,491]

I don't like the idea of signing a cripple* to replace a flop, as much as I used to have a grudging admiration for the player.

* I mean no real disrespect, but the fact stands - Villa will never be the player he was following that injury. He's already nearly 30. A short-term deal - maybe a loan - could work, but otherwise no, no, no.

[Sheva. 5,373]

He's already nearly 30.

He's 31

[Cripen 110]

I think that loaning Villa isnt the worst idea. He could be better than Torres. He's a good finisher and all we need is a good finisher. If we cannot bring in Falcao or Cavani in January then it its quite good short-term solution.