Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and log in to join the CFC discussion! ×

Official - AVB confirmed as Chelsea boss

Guest justin_3d

By Guest justin_3d,
in Matthew Harding Stand

 Share

Candidates for the new Chelsea management  

222 members have voted

  1. 1. Who you want to see as the new manager?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Term-X

Term-X 7,891

Posted
Posted

To all those people saying "we shouldn't sign anyone until we get a new manager"....

Hiddink is the clubs advisor and has been for the past 2 years. So if we bring in anyone before he officially arrives, any move would have been consulted with Guus either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
luke.

luke. 7

Posted
Posted

To all those people saying "we shouldn't sign anyone until we get a new manager"....

Hiddink is the clubs advisor and has been for the past 2 years. So if we bring in anyone before he officially arrives, any move would have been consulted with Guus either way.

Should wait until manager is announced until at least announcing any player deals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
We Hate Scouse

We Hate Scouse 10,330

Posted
Posted

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/3613447/Guus-Hiddink-Come-and-get-me-Chelsea.html

GUUS HIDDINK is ready to quit Turkey for the Chelsea job.

The Dutchman, 64, has had enough of international coaching and wants to return to club management.

In a clear message to Blues owner Roman Abramovich, Hiddink made it plain he is eager to go back to Stamford Bridge and replace axed Carlo Ancelotti as boss.

He said: "I never told anybody that I was going to continue working with Turkey.

"I feel energetic and I like working every day.

"I feel I need to do more, so a club role is more preferable than coaching a national team.

"I haven't told the president of the Turkish FA. But he is an intelligent man and I'm sure he follows the world's media. There is no official offer yet, so I cannot guarantee anything."

Hiddink expects to open formal negotiations with Abramovich next week, following Turkey's European Championship qualifier in Belgium tomorrow.

He still has 12 months of his Turkish contract to run and is relying on Chelsea to negotiate a £4million compensation package.

Hiddink spent three months in charge following Phil Scolari's sacking and led the club to glory in the 2009 FA Cup final against Everton.

He still refers to Abramovich as 'boss' and remains in regular contact with the Russian billionaire.

Look's pretty guaranteed now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
warnie_666

warnie_666 1,081

Posted
Posted

Don't be so ignorant. In the late 80s PSV was a strong force and he won domestic leagues and European cup. in 2005 he took PSV to semi final in CL

Louis Van Gaal took Bayern Munich to Finals against all odds. Why not go for him.?

Hiddink's stint at Chelsea is very deceiving for the following reasons:

1. As someone pointed out...He came under NO Presssure with Team already out of several top competitions.

2. When a New manager is appointed, all players hit peak because they want to impress the new manager. Look at the first 10 games of Avram, Scolari, Hiddink and Ancelotti.

3. His club management record isnt something you would call great. The last great feat he achieved was over 2 decades ago.

4. He failed miserably at Real Madrid over an entire season. We have a similar structure here.

Now his positives:

1. Very good as an International Manager.

2. Has a good record in making ordinary teams surpass expectations in international tournaments. Hasnt won anything though.

The first year we may well win the league under him because players are eager to perform well under a new manager. Its the second year where his management will be tested, when players are in their comfort zones and he faces a task in keeping everyone happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
magic weeds

magic weeds 446

Posted
Posted

Louis Van Gaal took Bayern Munich to Finals against all odds. Why not go for him.?

Hiddink's stint at Chelsea is very deceiving for the following reasons:

1. As someone pointed out...He came under NO Presssure with Team already out of several top competitions.

2. When a New manager is appointed, all players hit peak because they want to impress the new manager. Look at the first 10 games of Avram, Scolari, Hiddink and Ancelotti.

3. His club management record isnt something you would call great. The last great feat he achieved was over 2 decades ago.

4. He failed miserably at Real Madrid over an entire season. We have a similar structure here.

What do you mean by SEVERAL TOP COMPETITIONS? he took us to the semi final of the Champions league where we were robbed big time, He won the FA cup. took us to 3rd place in EPL despite that disastrous campaign with Scolari. Is the Carling cup "SEVERAL TOP COMPTETIONS"?

C'mon man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
termninja

termninja 5,290

Posted
Posted

Louis Van Gaal took Bayern Munich to Finals against all odds. Why not go for him.?

Hiddink's stint at Chelsea is very deceiving for the following reasons:

1. As someone pointed out...He came under NO Presssure with Team already out of several top competitions.

2. When a New manager is appointed, all players hit peak because they want to impress the new manager. Look at the first 10 games of Avram, Scolari, Hiddink and Ancelotti.

3. His club management record isnt something you would call great. The last great feat he achieved was over 2 decades ago.

4. He failed miserably at Real Madrid over an entire season. We have a similar structure here.

Now his positives:

1. Very good as an International Manager.

2. Has a good record in making ordinary teams surpass expectations in international tournaments. Hasnt won anything though.

The first year we may well win the league under him because players are eager to perform well under a new manager. Its the second year where his management will be tested, when players are in their comfort zones and he faces a task in keeping everyone happy.

Perhaps...there is only 1 way to find out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kostas

Kostas 1,468

Posted
Posted

The board would look at him and see another Carlo. They'd be turned off instantly.

It's not Ancelotti record that turned them off. Not to mention that LvG has won quite a few more league titles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Henrique

Henrique 9,133

Posted
Posted

Louis Van Gaal took Bayern Munich to Finals against all odds. Why not go for him.?

Hiddink's stint at Chelsea is very deceiving for the following reasons:

1. As someone pointed out...He came under NO Presssure with Team already out of several top competitions.

2. When a New manager is appointed, all players hit peak because they want to impress the new manager. Look at the first 10 games of Avram, Scolari, Hiddink and Ancelotti.

3. His club management record isnt something you would call great. The last great feat he achieved was over 2 decades ago.

4. He failed miserably at Real Madrid over an entire season. We have a similar structure here.

Now his positives:

1. Very good as an International Manager.

2. Has a good record in making ordinary teams surpass expectations in international tournaments. Hasnt won anything though.

The first year we may well win the league under him because players are eager to perform well under a new manager. Its the second year where his management will be tested, when players are in their comfort zones and he faces a task in keeping everyone happy.

Sorry, but your reasons to justify Hiddink stints as very deceiving were anything but convincing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ChelseaFanUK

ChelseaFanUK 1,014

Posted
Posted

Louis Van Gaal took Bayern Munich to Finals against all odds. Why not go for him.?

Hiddink's stint at Chelsea is very deceiving for the following reasons:

1. As someone pointed out...He came under NO Presssure with Team already out of several top competitions.

2. When a New manager is appointed, all players hit peak because they want to impress the new manager. Look at the first 10 games of Avram, Scolari, Hiddink and Ancelotti.

3. His club management record isnt something you would call great. The last great feat he achieved was over 2 decades ago.

4. He failed miserably at Real Madrid over an entire season. We have a similar structure here.

Now his positives:

1. Very good as an International Manager.

2. Has a good record in making ordinary teams surpass expectations in international tournaments. Hasnt won anything though.

The first year we may well win the league under him because players are eager to perform well under a new manager. Its the second year where his management will be tested, when players are in their comfort zones and he faces a task in keeping everyone happy.

Agree with this 100000%. I guarantee most of our fans who want Hiddink, want him based on 4months of him being here. What happened with his almighty Russia team before World Cup? Thats right they miserably didnt qualify. He is nothing special. But, we will see next May, and if we were to finish 4th and scrape CL qualification, wonder how many of his admirers would suddenly realise

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BlueLion.

BlueLion. 21,491

Posted
Posted

Carlo was 'nothing special' either until he won the Double, then he could do no wrong. Suddenly we have a bad season and he's public enemy number one. My point is football supporters are fickle - remember when we all used to boo Torres and call him a ladyboy? (cue the three or four members who say ' I didn't' - yeah, bullshit, of course you didn't :lol:).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fulham Broadway

Fulham Broadway 17,350

Posted
Posted

Carlo was 'nothing special' either until he won the Double, then he could do no wrong. Suddenly we have a bad season and he's public enemy number one. My point is football supporters are fickle - remember when we all used to boo Torres and call him a ladyboy? (cue the three or four members who say ' I didn't' - yeah, bullshit, of course you didn't :lol:).

I never called him that. Peroxide Tranny, maybe.

People shouldnt overestimate the importance of a coach - as JT said, even under Mourinho, once you get on the pitch, the manager is mostly irrelevant for 90 minutes.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...