Man City 1-1 Chelsea

[bluesman2610 1,341]

Damn.. 

[TheHulk 1,859]

Pochettino out.

[DDA 9,690]

It's always that cunt

[Vesper 28,875]

ffs

Edited February 17 by Vesper

[Sir Mikel OBE 4,920]

We have posed no threat since Sterling went off.

[Vesper 28,875]

we likely lose this now

[LAM09 6,753]

Five at the back with 20 minutes remaining, and Poch has used all the sub windows (only brought on three players). 

Why on earth change something that was working?

  

Just now, Sir Mikel OBE said:

We have posed no threat since Sterling went off.

Nkunku and Enzo/Jackson moment.

Edited February 17 by LAM09

[Nero 1,838]

WE NEED MUDRYKS SPEED

Poch you idiot 

[bluesman2610 1,341]

Just now, Vesper said:

we likely lose this now

Don’t put that in the atmosphere 

[lucio 5,418]

14 minutes ago, YorkshireBlue said:

Gallaghers fault clearly 🤣

yes because he was too stupid to "put the brakes on" as the commentator said , he's dogshit

[Strike 7,217]

Just now, LAM09 said:

Five at the back with 20 minutes remaining, and Poch has used all the sub windows (only brought on three players). 

Why on earth change something that was working?

With the way the game was going we needed to change and freshen up. Just don’t have options on the bench 

[Mhsc 878]

Honestly when did bringing on more defenders to try to be solid and hold out for 3pts last work as a technique? Not since Conte or Mourinho's era. I have always found it baffling. Attacking is part of defense because by being a threat you also limit what they are prepared to commit to going forward. Against a team like City it is borderline moronic to think they wont score if you just let them attack you over and over.

[lucio 5,418]

Just now, Mhsc said:

Honestly when did bringing on more defenders to try to be solid and hold out for 3pts last work as a technique? Not since Conte or Mourinho's era. I have always found it baffling. Attacking is part of defense because by being a threat you also limit what they are prepared to commit to going forward. Against a team like City it is borderline moronic to think they wont score if you just let them attack you over and over.

poch out

[LAM09 6,753]

2 minutes ago, Strike said:

With the way the game was going we needed to change and freshen up. Just don’t have options on the bench 

We didn't need to bring another defender on and invite pressure. Best form of defence is to attack.

Mudryk & Madueke rotting on the bench.

1 minute ago, Mhsc said:

Honestly when did bringing on more defenders to try to be solid and hold out for 3pts last work as a technique? Not since Conte or Mourinho's era. I have always found it baffling. Attacking is part of defense because by being a threat you also limit what they are prepared to commit to going forward. Against a team like City it is borderline moronic to think they wont score if you just let them attack you over and over.

A coward's approach. These are such moments that set managers apart.

Edited February 17 by LAM09

[Strike 7,217]

This is the upper limit of what we could hope for in terms of a performance away at City. 

And people are still bitter 

[lucio 5,418]

poch looks old, he isn't the youthful upcoming guy he was at spurs, just a washed up loser with nothing to offer. Sack this fraud and give some wildcard a chance in the final

[Sir Mikel OBE 4,920]

Thank god its only 4 minutes of stoppage.

[LAM09 6,753]

Just now, Strike said:

This is the upper limit of what we could hope for in terms of a performance away at City. 

And people are still bitter 

No one is blaming or are disgruntled with the players. The issue is with Poch thinking this is a CFC side from 04-06.