Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


J.F.
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Gundalf said:

Would he get playtime here tho?`Can see Poch still using Gallagher instead of Palmer for at least another season

Your guess is as good as mine. I'm all for promising talents being signed mainly by someone with a good eye for youngsters, but at some point, you need players that have a 90%+ chance of delivering the goods from the get-go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of the few appearances Palmer has made on senior level I have probably seen a quarter. The player he is most similar IMO is Kai but the Leverkusen one. He has the same swagger and elegance with ability for spectacular goals but is lanky and weak af. Good end speed but average acceleration and balance. What palmer hopefully offers is goals. He has scored in about every match on development and youth level and also in the two super cup games this season but never in PL. At age 21 he is a gamble mostly bc of how little he has played. Kai at that age already had over 100 pro games. I hope Palmer still has the Hunger after winning CL and PL as bit part player but if he wants the move he probably has. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Gundalf said:

By the end of the window we will have the worlds most expensive GK, the worlds most expensive number 9 and the worlds most expensive LB all on loan 😂

Least some other cunt is paying their wages though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Gundalf said:

By the end of the window we will have the worlds most expensive GK, the worlds most expensive number 9 and the worlds most expensive LB all on loan 😂

Just proves the arbitrary price of players means very little

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spuds actually look surprisingly competent after Kane has gone. Probably shouldn’t be entertaining any sales to them since Big Ange may be legit good. Anyways, they have Sarr and Bissouma in CM and Maddison at #10 so there really isn’t a place for Gallagher.

Levy has had a default “No Chelsea” policy for years now. So why would we help them out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

£45m for Cole Palmer is madness but yeah, we will pay it.

If people are expecting him to come in and waltz in to the first team and light it up though, don’t. Has talent but again, has a very very small amount of games in senior football - personally if the plan was always going to be another young kid, we would of may as well have kept one of Angelo or Washington.

Edited by OneMoSalah
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OneMoSalah said:

£45m for Cole Palmer is madness but yeah, we will pay it. 

Well we are living in a world where Forest rejects a £43m bid for Brennan Johnson. 

Edited by Gundalf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Poch has given this the thumbs up then I'm all for it- Yes he's raw, but so is the likes of Mudryk, Noni, Chucky, Lesley, Lavia and others.

We are creating something very exciting here, and I'm right behind this signing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gundalf said:

Well we live in a world where Forest rejects a £43m bid for Brennan Johnson. 

Johnson got 8 PL goals in his debut PL season. That and his age are always going to give Forest the chance to ask for £45-50m and above. Plus the way the market is, £40-50m is the standard starting price considering the money PL clubs have from the TV deals.

Wouldn’t say we’ve paid value for money for a lot of players under Boehly so Cole Palmer, if the deal was to be done for £40-45m, would probably fall into the same category as well.

Not so worried about the prices as much now as I doubt we will pay value for money often with this ownership now but am a lot more concerned about the profile. Palmer is not proven enough and also doesn’t strike me as the missing piece despite some decent showings for City but again, would they have signed Doku if Palmer was that good and ready to go? 

But I’ve seen Chelsea people making youtube videos and saying he’s great or whatever already. So I guess he is….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, lluubbeenn said:

Their recent history with Richarlison and Joao Pedro look good, but I just don't see the physicality in the boy. 

the lad was still just 17 years old a couple of months ago

he looks like he will fill out nicely

Chelsea não para em Ângelo e apresenta proposta por Deivid Washington, nova  joia do SantosDeivid Washington escolhe o Chelsea e fica perto do adeus ao Santos |  OneFootballDeivid Washington ganha espaço e passará por testes no profissional do  Santos | OneFootball

Chelsea 'submit £17m transfer bid for Santos wonderkid with personal terms  already agreed'.. but he'll head out on loan | The Sun

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...