Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


Tomo
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Magic Lamps said:

Maybe it is but a 20m + reasonable wages Marketing buy . So if the board really sees any commercial benefit of a player who costs peanuts and does not demand playing time, I am actually all for it. However, if it means no proper quality DM being bought then to hell with tiny Ty. 

Yes, the low cost makes it not so so bad.

Do you think that Adams really may end up the only DMF type we buy?

As in Adams will be the buy that replaces a failed Caicedo attempt?

I will lose it then.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Vesper said:

Yes, the low cost makes it not so so bad.

Do you think that Adams really may end up the only DMF type we buy?

As in Adams will be the buy that replaces a failed Caicedo attempt?

I will lose it then.

 

Every credible jounalist said that Adams and Caicedo are 2 completely seperate deals, so no way Adams would be our only DM buy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Vesper said:

Yes, the low cost makes it not so so bad.

Do you think that Adams really may end up the only DMF type we buy?

As in Adams will be the buy that replaces a failed Caicedo attempt?

I will lose it then.

 

I really hope not. The board would be taking the piss if so. Seriously Poch would rightly feel kidded. 
but If the board sell it right, promise to sign quality DM in Jan, Poch might still grudgingly swallow his tongue but surely the relationship would be strained. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nkunku was going to be such a blessing and was the best thing to happen for Mudryk. Takes the pressure right off of him and allowed us to continue to be patient with him. 

If it’s true that he’s out long term that pressure and scoring/assisting burned returns. He’ll have to be at his sharpest right away to pick up the slack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, mkh said:

Chelsea are ready to make a new offer for Vlahovic: Lukaku + €30M.

Deal is edging closer🙉

[via@NicoSchira]

slowly coming to terms with signing a other CF just bc Nkunku is so injury prone and NJ has afcon. Still not convinced Morata 2.0 is the right option tho

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Magic Lamps said:

slowly coming to terms with signing a other CF just bc Nkunku is so injury prone and NJ has afcon. Still not convinced Morata 2.0 is the right option tho

He's a bang average player destined to flop in the premier league, but aside that it should be seen as a massive red flag Juventus are so desperate to offload him infavour of Lukaku. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, MoroccanBlue said:

He's a bang average player destined to flop in the premier league, but aside that it should be seen as a massive red flag Juventus are so desperate to offload him infavour of Lukaku. 

Probably accurate. He looks ordinary technically. But many great strikers were average footballers. Esp German strikers like Klose, the two Müllers, Klinsmann, Völler. Not even starting with level below like Bierhoff, Gomez, Kirsten, Rummenigge. Now the best german CF is a guy named Füllkrug who made his topflight debut in his mid 20ies and is little more than a battering ram with a wicked shot. A CF who knows where the goal is and how to use his body does not need to be a great footballer. The mere presence, goal instinct, aerial ability and movement can create enough danger for our play to have an extra dimension. Havertz is arguably a more accomplished footballer than most traditional no.9. Yet his inability to convert easy chances renders him completely useless in this position. The problem here is not even buying a so-so CF. But again doing so for huge money on huge wages inviting all the pressure. This makes him a flop already in most ppls eyes. I argue that if we found a nice old-fashioned big striker with some experience, aerial ability, a bit of pace and a good attitude who just finishes the easy chances and otherwise does what ever the manager asks of him we would be fine. The problem is this striker already costs 70m+ if the club that is asking is Chelsea. Striker market is just insanely weak. But surely there should be a better value deal than Vlahovic out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You