Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


Tomo
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, OneMoSalah said:

Permanent makes more sense. I don’t think with Caicedo & Lavia he has a realistic long term future here. Barring a very very spectacular development.

@Pizy lets hope so. Paying £50m for someone they don’t want and wouldn’t have a clear and obvious role in our team here is a stupid move on all accounts. 

Well that isn't what it will be credited as. 

If we buy him for £50m on a 5 year contract and sell Gallagher It will either be: 

+£27m on the books. 

Or if both deals fall through: 

£0 on the books. 

The board apprantly look at this deal through this lens. £42m and £50m make little difference as the key for them is selling Gallagher. 

BTW, I do not agree with this, just pointing it our. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, OneMoSalah said:

. I don’t think with Caicedo & Lavia he has a realistic long term future here. Barring a very very spectacular development.

Enzo needs to buck his ideas up. His place could become very much in danger if he has another dross season this year. He is not living up to even half of the price we paid for him. Caicedo has shown a lot more than what he has. Lavia has looked very sharp in pre-season. Enzo needs to do more or the likes of Ugo would need to be tested in that midfield instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DDA said:

He is not living up to even half of the price we paid for him.

And I wouldn't even blame the guy tbh. He had nothing to warrant his pricetag in the beginning, our owners getting carried away (initial offer was like 1/3 less and it was attractive offer) and a lot of fans going absolutely apeshit with him being future captain and better Fabregas for next 10 years to come isn't really Enzo's fault. This kind of pressure is what snubs young players more often, than helps them grow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Vegetable said:

And I wouldn't even blame the guy tbh. He had nothing to warrant his pricetag in the beginning, our owners getting carried away (initial offer was like 1/3 less and it was attractive offer) and a lot of fans going absolutely apeshit with him being future captain and better Fabregas for next 10 years to come isn't really Enzo's fault. This kind of pressure is what snubs young players more often, than helps them grow.

He’s been poor mate. Ghosting through games. His tenacity for the game and passing was the reason we got him and both have been severely lacking.. thats without considering the price tag.  Football is like every other sport at the highest level, you have to deal with pressure. Thats why they are paid soo much money. I expect consistent output from my team at work and they get paid the smallest fraction of what these fuckers get paid. Fans make way too many excuses for these guys. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt Law says that Gallagher definitely is flying back to London today. 

So yeah, that shit is dead. So I guess Conor is staying at the club then. Where and when he’ll play I have no clue since we’re so stacked in midfield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not convinced Toney would excel here. And the idea that this board would sanction £60m for a 28 year old seems super far fetched. 

I was open to the idea when we were first linked with him months ago but I think I’ve grown skeptical that he could step up from Brentford to a top club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Thor said:

Proper team under Roman, but we weren't competitive in the league since 2017... Won a CL with a good run, and that was a bandaid to a downfall that was happening for a long period. Look at the signings in the 5 years prior to Clearlake and tell me all the good signings. 

That was some "bandaid" right there. 😆

Yes, there have been very good signings even without including Kante (which is prob the reason for the arbitrary 5y), which contributed for the aforementioned "bandaid".

You seem to assume players will always improve and reach the level we require. The club evidently disagrees considering the number of signings being done this season.

Edited by robsblubot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 1 member are here!

×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You