Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


J.F.
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Reddish-Blue said:

50 Millionen? Wir müssen eine Spurs-Steuer hinzufügen und sie auf über 60 Millionen belaufen. Warum sollten wir mit unserem Akademiespieler einen Lokalrivalen stärken?    

Palmer will be new Nkunku will be back after his injury Chuk will also be back plus Gallagher only has a contract until 2025
The transfer fee will be a pure profit because HG
And Ugo Lavia Caicedo Enzo all want to play and were brought in for big money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Reddish-Blue said:

50 million?   We need to add a Spurs tax and make it >60 million for them.   Why should we strengthen a local rival with our academy player?    

I think most ppl on here would say he weakens them, reading what people say about Conor on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Conor isn’t good enough technically for a team wanting to win the premier league and champions league. He shouldn’t be anything more than someone who plays the weaker teams in the cups and occasionally comes on to wind down the clock. You don’t reject 50m for a player like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The team is starting to look fresh, youthful and energized. With a smattering of experience it's a far cry from last season.

It's over to Poch now to mould the team and get it like clockwork. Not expecting miracles but I'm expecting to see better football and also a btter modd in the camp, which already looks to be better.

Onwards and upwards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as i said, just exploiting us to get cheap depth for their squad. braindead idea to loan him out, he's a baller and should have had minutes here already over gallagher. regardless of how well he does in training they will always pick the guy they actually own, and as a DM its hard to stand out over someone else who is solid 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What makes things worse is that if Santos doesn’t get minutes and the ability to grow and develop is that he’ll be forgotten about and stuck in infinite loan limbo for years. The Casadei loan was picture perfect and IF Santos was going on loan it should’ve been to Portugal or to a more stable club that he walked straight into.

But for me he shouldn’t have been loaned. While Ugochukwu looks like a potentially solid player I don’t think we should’ve signed him. Our 4 CM’s for this season should’ve been Enzo, Caicedo, Lavia, and Santos. He would’ve got decent minutes in cup competitions and as a sub in the league. And perhaps most beneficially he would’ve been training under Poch and alongside world class players day in and day out all season. 

Feels like the club kind of panicked and signed Ugo purely as insurance in case Caicedo didn’t happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Feels like the club kind of panicked and signed Ugo purely as insurance in case Caicedo didn’t happen. 

I feel Ugo was always a target given his profile (Experienced tall and strong DM). A player you rotate or bring on to secure leads. 

Early days but Santos has every opportunity to break into that Forest midfield which is average to begin with. If he doesn't, its more questions on him and his work ethic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MoroccanBlue said:

I feel Ugo was always a target given his profile (Experienced tall and strong DM). A player you rotate or bring on to secure leads. 

Early days but Santos has every opportunity to break into that Forest midfield which is average to begin with. If he doesn't, its more questions on him and his work ethic. 

That's right. Santos needs to earn that spot in NFs midfield. He shouldn't just be given a place because he's our player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...