Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


Tomo
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, bluesman2610 said:
We have well and truly fecked this up.
I wouldn’t read too much into Caicedo following Lavia, he follows everyone.
Except Liverpool

roflmaooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, bluesman2610 said:

They share a bed like Morecambe and Wise

Thatcher ass-kissing Tory plonkers, especially Morecambe (my mum curses them everytime she sees them mentioned, lol)

http://fc95d419f4478b3b6e5f-3f71d0fe2b653c4f00f32175760e96e7.r87.cf1.rackcdn.com/18571C4EE5504F98867695BDF539C16E.pdf

eabb8dd5fb08f15c6144de4624283736.png

472b5ffa073e356ad3e727a4ddfe5a57.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Vesper said:

I would have purchased a veteran 30+ one on the cheap, like we did with Giroud (and that worked out VERY well)

my dream buy for that is impossible, (Immobile) as he likely will not leave Lazio until he is truly rinsed (and perhaps not even then)

he lives around a ten, 15 minute walk from Stadio Olimpico

Ciro Immobile receives the first Golden Boot of his career

f7422b9a2ec4c11d139e28e2371d6669.png

after him

Borja Iglesias
Gerard Moreno
Mehdi Taremi
Gaëtan Laborde
Wissam Ben Yedder
Niclas Füllkrug   
Jhon Córdoba
Andrea Belotti  
Duván Zapata   
Marko Arnautovic   
Luis Muriel  
Paulinho    Sporting CP

 

If only Kevin Gameiro was 6 years younger. Would of suited us well I think. I really like the comparison of Giroud, though - having a taller striker to give us more options against Stoke-like teams would be a huge bonus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SinineUltra said:

 

If only Kevin Gameiro was 6 years younger. Would of suited us well I think. I really like the comparison of Giroud, though - having a taller striker to give us more options against Stoke-like teams would be a huge bonus.

69668b25a1a23f0b57ec0dfa2b119f2e.png

d7ac98a1eff36bb4af2e7e7e719b9105.png

75610243841cdd205e2de389fee65995.png

Jhon Córdoba - Wikipedia

Jhon Cordoba - Infobae

Edited by Vesper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone see the Monday night football with Jamie and Gary? Not hyping Lavia at all, almost questioning the signing. Proceed to watch Uniteds midfield get run through by Wolves. Yikes. Our defence and midfield is stacked now it’s insane, under Poch especially. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More optimistic than I have been for a long time . Only one thing saddens me and many will disagree — but that one thing is Lukaku !! If we continue to play the way we did on Saturday,he could be amazing in this team. Don’t get me wrong — I never want to see him anywhere near Chelsea ever again — but we paid £97 million for him and we need another striker. If we continue to get the ball forward quickly as per Saturday I believe things could have turned out differently.Sad it’s too late now !!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Enzo, Caicedo, Lavia, Santos, Ugo, Casadei - (not even including Gallagher and Chukwu) - isnt that a bit too much?

Sure, Ugo and Casadei will go on loans, Gallagher sold, but still, these players will be back next year. I feel like we will sell at least 1 of them next summer - hopefully not to one of our opponents, bc every single one of them has enormous potential. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Gundalf said:

Enzo, Caicedo, Lavia, Santos, Ugo, Casadei - (not even including Gallagher and Chukwu) - isnt that a bit too much?

Sure, Ugo and Casadei will go on loans, Gallagher sold, but still, these players will be back next year. I feel like we will sell at least 1 of them next summer - hopefully not to one of our opponents, bc every single one of them has enormous potential. 

The one I’m not sure about as I mentioned last night is Ugo. Casadei and Santos are at least pretty different profiles of midfielders compared to Enzo, Caicedo, and Lavia. I can imagine Casadei for example being a Lampard type who plays further up. That’s probably his future. But Ugo is a pure DM and we’ll have 3 players (Caicedo, Lavia, and Santos) who all occupy that deeper position so I’m not sure where he’d fit. Puzzling signing for me. If he was purely an insurance signing in case we failed with Caicedo or Lavia then we could’ve waited until the deadline to get him since it’s not like anyone else was after him.

Gallagher for me HAS to be sold to the highest bidder this window. It’ll be sad and unfortunate on a personal level because he clearly loves the club and is desperate to fight for his place, but he isn’t a deep midfielder and we have others for the more advanced roles. Need to go not only for on the pitch reasons but also to help us out FFP wise.

Two of the biggest priorities before the window closes are to get as much money as possible for Gallagher and Chalobah. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://thedailybriefing.io/i/136053368/al-ahli

  • Merih Demiral to Al Ahli, here we go! There’s an agreement now in place with Atalanta and player side — set to be signed in the next 24 hours. Two Premier League clubs also wanted Demiral but Al Ahli agreed a deal on the same conditions and now it’s done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Hamilton said:

Would rather see Cucurella go and Maatsen stay

Think the only reason for that is to help balance the books for FFP...with no-one keen on Cucurella on a permanent transfer.   Clubs will be lining up for Maatsen at the 20 million mark. 

I was actually keen to see Maatsen play as a backup winger this season, seemed to have proper pace/dribbling that could really be useful alongside Chilwell/James/Gusto. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gundalf said:

Enzo, Caicedo, Lavia, Santos, Ugo, Casadei - (not even including Gallagher and Chukwu) - isnt that a bit too much?

Sure, Ugo and Casadei will go on loans, Gallagher sold, but still, these players will be back next year. I feel like we will sell at least 1 of them next summer - hopefully not to one of our opponents, bc every single one of them has enormous potential. 

Long term yes not all of them are gonna stay around but have 2-3 years before we need to sell any of them (can't remember off the top of my head how long Conor has left) 

Earlier in the window i did think Caicedo and an older player made sense but once i realised that 4-2-3-1 isn't going to be the primary formation and we gonna play more 4-3-3 or a variant of it then Caicedo + Lavia are too good to turn that down. We have too many for now but better than having too few..i'd say long term we'll keep 5 that will be Enzo,Caicedo,Lavia,Casadei and Santos.but like i said is 2-3 years before we make these kind of decisions.and we'll make a profit on who is sold.

Man City,Real Madrid etc...wouldnt worry about having too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You