Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


Tomo
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, LAM09 said:

Fair price point - Danjuma.

All in & best CF that's obtainable - Your fellow countryman, Osimhen. 

Two names I've been mentioning for a number of months, or years in the case of the latter.

Good...

Napoli will not sale us Osimhen...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Alabama said:

Good...

Napoli will not sale us Osimhen...

Every player has their price. Also, this sort of thing might drive them out - https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-11076351/Napoli-President-not-sign-African-players-unless-agree-not-play-AFCON.html

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dont think lb cover with a 50mn player should be priority for us

Eapecially if it means if we loose colwill.

Someone like a maehle would have worked. Cucu at lcb wont be ideal given his height...really not getting the boards thinking here...this is going to be a transition year, might as well give colwill the minutes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't believe Chelsea's scoring problem are the forwards are such.
Ok Lukaku proved wanting and Werner is one of the inglorious league of chance wasters.
But Kai-Pulisic and Ziyech ? Why ?
The real problem is we don't have players to open up defenses and free spaces. Hazard was definitely one and Cesc with his accurate passing.
Really I don't see how if we had signed Haaland he could pull things out of the fire without a Hazard to do the preliminary work for him.

Edited by cosmicway
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Vesper said:

he is 1.72m!

that's only an inch and a half taller than KANTE

we will get ROASTED ALIVE with him playing CB

and even height aside, that does NOT address the insane price

when you toss in the £20m more it would cost us to buy back Colwill

we are dropping 87m euros (£72.5m) on this deal!

NOT HAPPY

AT ALL

 

it is madness

Cucurella for 30m + Colwill with a buyback. That's a good deal.

I would overlook the lack of height if the player has the technical ability, ball progression of Cucurella. With another CB (Fofana), we won't need Cucurella starting every week at LCB either since Fofana, Silva, Koulibaly can be fielded.

This is actually a massive Alonso/Emerson upgrade and one that we were crying out for since the Chilwell injury derailed our season.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Strike said:

Chilwell injury derailed our season

Don't agree with this. 

 

7 minutes ago, Strike said:

This [signing Cucurella] is actually a massive Alonso/Emerson upgrade

I agree it's an upgrade on Emerson and on Alonso's defending but whether his overall attacking impact would be better than Alonso's is possible but not certain I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, OhForAGreavsie said:

Don't agree with this. 

 

I agree it's an upgrade on Emerson and on Alonso's defending but whether his overall attacking impact would be better than Alonso's is possible but not certain I think.

Cucurella is much more rounded than Alonso from an attacking perspective; better at carrying the ball, against the press, passer, and linking up. That adds a lot more to the overall team. 
 

I do agree with your point on Chilly.

Edited by Clockwork
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Clockwork said:

Cucurella is much more rounded than Alonso from an attacking perspective; better at carrying the ball, against the press, passer, and linking up. That adds a lot more to the overall team. 

Yes, I agree with all of this. It's Marcus's goal contributions, and the goal threat at the far post which opponents have to account for, that I would put on the other side of the ledger. 

Edited by OhForAGreavsie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, OhForAGreavsie said:

Yes, I agree with all of this. It's Marcus's goal contributions, and the goal threat at the far post which opponents have to account for, that I would put on the other side of the ledger. 

The goal threat from Alonso came at a big cost to the team balance and defensive solidity imo. Credit to him, he put in good shifts in the two cup finals but he lacked pace which makes a big difference in this wingback system.

I feel Cucurella even without similar assist/goal numbers - will help the team progress the ball up-field and maintain possession there. Should improve our attack as well with his mobility, passing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You