Jump to content

The Mourinho Thread


Steve
 Share

Recommended Posts

There's a difference between being pissed that he left Chelsea (nobody is) and being pissed that he joined City (plenty of people) You do realise he's helping them mount a serious title challenge (including by taking points off us)? I don't think it will matter too much in the end if we win the league but if City do then it will be partly down to Lampard. And what Chelsea fan/employee would be happy with that? Not Jose, that's for sure.

You're being silly, watch the interview. Jose is a competitor, he has no ill-will towards Lamps, its about winning and losing. There isn't one incident that decides the fate of a season, its many instances... you guys keep forgetting that a point at City is a very good result and not one that is to be considered dropped points(even with the late equalizer down a man)

Lamps is without question an iconic figure for Chelsea FC and nothing is going to taint what he did for the club from 2001 to 2014, not even the title going back to a very good City. He has a legacy few can touch at the club, he's a record goalscorer for fuck sakes! Nothing will change the history he's written as a legend at the club, precisely why he was sung off the pitch by the most diehard of Chelsea supporters, the travelling away fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh I didn't think Chelstransfer just rehashed old quotes but you're right, fair enough. How exactly does showing the original source help your point though?

The eyes don't lie, does Jose look like he's dismissing Lamps as just some other player who he's mad at? or does it look like he's reluctant to speak glowingly about a rival player?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're being silly, watch the interview. Jose is a competitor, he has no ill-will towards Lamps, its about winning and losing. There isn't one incident that decides the fate of a season, its many instances... you guys keep forgetting that a point at City is a very good result and not one that is to be considered dropped points(even with the late equalizer down a man) Lamps is without question an iconic figure for Chelsea FC and nothing is going to taint what he did for the club from 2001 to 2014, not even the title going back to a very good City. He has a legacy few can touch at the club, he's a record goalscorer for fuck sakes! Nothing will change the history he's written as a legend at the club, precisely why he was sung off the pitch by the most diehard of Chelsea supporters, the travelling away fans.

The eyes don't lie, does Jose look like he's dismissing Lamps as just some other player who he's mad at? or does it look like he's reluctant to speak glowingly about a rival player?

You're 1-0 up to 10 men and concede. If that's not dropping points then I don't know what is. And it's simply your opinion that his reputation hasn't been tainted. For many fans it has - we'll see if the Chelsea supporters are singing Lampard's name if he scores the winner at the Bridge and what Jose's 'eyes' are like then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're 1-0 up to 10 men and concede. If that's not dropping points then I don't know what is. And it's simply your opinion that his reputation hasn't been tainted. For many fans it has - we'll see if the Chelsea supporters are singing Lampard's name if he scores the winner at the Bridge and what Jose's 'eyes' are like then.

to get anything at Etihad to me is points gained not lost. It was tough how it went down, we could've had maximum points but if you'd polled every Chelsea supporter before the kickoff and asked them if they'd take a point 99% of them would've bitten your arm off for it.

Now your just making shit up... how pathetic. Let me play your dumb game though you mean to tell me the 2 goals and 4pts Lamps won for City is enough to taint the legacy of a man who scored 211 for the club and won multiple titles? How long have you been a Chelsea fan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now your just making shit up... how pathetic. Let me play your dumb game though you mean to tell me the 2 goals and 4pts Lamps won for City is enough to taint the legacy of a man who scored 211 for the club and won multiple titles? How long have you been a Chelsea fan?

:lol: why are you getting so defensive? I've only been a fan for a couple of days so I don't know Lampard's history at the club. Did he score goals or something? Please forgive me and the rest of the fans who don't love Lampard so much anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol: why are you getting so defensive? I've only been a fan for a couple of days so I don't know Lampard's history at the club. Did he score goals or something? Please forgive me and the rest of the fans who don't love Lampard so much anymore.

ADD and short term memory is rampant amongst youth these days, I can sympathize with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone who still thinks lampard's reputation hasn't been tainted in the eyes of some Chelsea fans is either living in denial or just plain delusional. There's no justifaction for what he did and while his reputation has a legend will remain (nothing can change that), Some (if not most) fans perception of him as a person/character wise is definitely tainted and some will never view lampard the same again. That's for sure.

lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...