OhForAGreavsie 6,078 Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 So the entire sum of £50m from the new sponsorship deal won't be accounted as club revenue? What are the exact figure?The precise figures are regarded as both private and sensitive so they have not been disclosed. It is not possible to discover the amounts very easily from the public accounts because they are often too vague and many of the items which appear in them are not accountable for FFP purposes.What has always been known is that the FFP regulations themselves state that uefa will examine any 'related party' sponsorships to see if they represent 'fair value'. If they do represent fair value then fine, no problem. If they do not then uefa accept only the amount they determine represents fair value and exclude the rest before deciding if a club has passed FFP.City, PSG and Monaco all fell foul of the fair value rule. City tried to argue it but lost. PSG stuck their hands up and said, "it's a fair cop." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidzeret 2,257 Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 New developmentshttp://weaintgotnohistory.sbnation.com/2014/10/6/6919143/report-chelsea-looking-to-double-current-shirt-sponsorship-deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DH1988 1,350 Posted October 7, 2014 Share Posted October 7, 2014 Too right, when rumoured @ £25m per season I thought of United.. £50m per season, surely we should aim at somewhere between £30-35m perhaps a shade upward? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidEU 2,023 Posted October 7, 2014 Share Posted October 7, 2014 New developmentshttp://weaintgotnohistory.sbnation.com/2014/10/6/6919143/report-chelsea-looking-to-double-current-shirt-sponsorship-dealSays we're potentially looking for sponsors for the training kit, Cobham and possibly Stamford Bridge too. If thats true we should be looking for £40m and upwards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viper22 2,418 Posted October 7, 2014 Share Posted October 7, 2014 This is all slightly depressing. I'm really hoping that either someone at Turkish Airlines was having a laugh or (preferably) the £25M report is low, and it's more like £30-£35M.Worst case scenario and we can't get any more than £25M and it has to come from Turkish Airlines then i'm just hoping for a short (2-3 year) contract length. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo 21,751 Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 Says we're potentially looking for sponsors for the training kit, Cobham and possibly Stamford Bridge too. If thats true we should be looking for £40m and upwards.Im not one for sentimental heart over whats best for the club and that but I would draw the line at renaming Stamford Bridge, some lines you just don't cross. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Term-X 7,891 Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 Im not one for sentimental heart over whats best for the club and that but I would draw the line at renaming Stamford Bridge, some lines you just don't cross.It makes sense for 'new' stadiums, but not old ones.. 'Stamford Bridge' is an extension of the Chelsea brand, so it's like renaming the club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,585 Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 It makes sense for 'new' stadiums, but not old ones.. 'Stamford Bridge' is an extension of the Chelsea brand, so it's like renaming the club.Well Santiago Bernabeu a historic stadium is under consideration to have a sponsored have their name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Term-X 7,891 Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 Well Santiago Bernabeu a historic stadium is under consideration to have a sponsored have their name.Under consideration?, I doubt they will rename it completely.. just put a sponsors name in front of it (i.e.. Pepsi presents.. the bernabeu stadium), still bad though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,585 Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 Under consideration?, I doubt they will rename it completely.. just put a sponsors name in front of it (i.e.. Pepsi presents.. the bernabeu stadium), still bad though.Abhu dahbi Santiago bernabue for 500 million in a period of 20 years. From Spanish marca. http://www.marca.com/2014/09/21/futbol/equipos/real_madrid/1411257011.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidzeret 2,257 Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 It makes sense for 'new' stadiums, but not old ones.. 'Stamford Bridge' is an extension of the Chelsea brand, so it's like renaming the club.Rightly so. Imagine Turkish Arena- Home of Chelsea FC from England. EwBut I'd be okay if Samsung build us a new stadium and names it after their brand (like Galaxy or something). There's something about the name Turkish Airlines that is not pleasing to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iseah100 5,612 Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 Rightly so. Imagine Turkish Arena- Home of Chelsea FC from England. EwBut I'd be okay if Samsung build us a new stadium and namef it after their brand (like Galaxy or something). There's something about the name Turkish Airlines that is not pleasing to me.Galaxy Arena sounds nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidzeret 2,257 Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 Abhu dahbi Santiago bernabue for 500 million in a period of 20 years. From Spanish marca. http://www.marca.com/2014/09/21/futbol/equipos/real_madrid/1411257011.htmlDoubt Madrid will add the name of a far away place to their precious Bernabeu for just 25m a year. That's something soulless teams like Arsenal or City will do, not Madrid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myself 793 Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 Doubt Madrid will add the name of a far away place to their precious Bernabeu for just 25m a year. That's something soulless teams like Arsenal or City will do, not Madrid.500m.. not 25m. That 500m would cover the entire cost of entirely renovating the Santiago Bernabeu, which they're planning to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cholo 428 Posted October 12, 2014 Share Posted October 12, 2014 Turkish Airlines will Replace Samsung as Chelsea Sponsor http://gamehasjustbegun.com/2014/10/the-blues-turkish-airlines-sponsorship-all-you-need-to-know/7020 Won't buy any Chelsea kits then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,573 Posted October 12, 2014 Share Posted October 12, 2014 Chelsea FC to sign major kit sponsorship deal with Turkish Airlines, which could lead to an even larger deal involving our home stadium.Turkish Airlines Stadium Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polo7 3,496 Posted October 12, 2014 Share Posted October 12, 2014 Turkish Airlines will Replace Samsung as Chelsea Sponsor http://gamehasjustbegun.com/2014/10/the-blues-turkish-airlines-sponsorship-all-you-need-to-know/7020 Won't buy any Chelsea kits thenPathetic attitude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted October 12, 2014 Share Posted October 12, 2014 Turkish Airlines will Replace Samsung as Chelsea Sponsor http://gamehasjustbegun.com/2014/10/the-blues-turkish-airlines-sponsorship-all-you-need-to-know/7020 Won't buy any Chelsea kits thenWhy? Are a Samsung or Chelsea fan?Personally, I buy the shirts for the lion on chest not the ad on it.Of course we can all have opinions on what looks better and what each likes more, but to stop buying shirts because of a change in sponsor is completely missing the whole point why we buy shirts in the first place: Chelsea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucio 5,418 Posted October 12, 2014 Share Posted October 12, 2014 Why? Are a Samsung or Chelsea fan?Personally, I buy the shirts for the lion on chest not the ad on it.Of course we can all have opinions on what looks better and what each likes more, but to stop buying shirts because of a change in sponsor is completely missing the whole point why we buy shirts in the first place: Chelsea. you can buy plenty of chelsea clothes , that have no sponsor. i haven't brought a shirt since 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boshman 1,073 Posted October 12, 2014 Share Posted October 12, 2014 Nobody would ever call it the Turkish Airlines Stadium or anything like that. Who ever called St James Park - Sports Direct Stadium or whatever their owner changed it too a few years ago? Everybody still called it St James Park. The same with The Bridge. Fans up and down the country and all over the world will call it Stamford Bridge. Like the article said, it would only work if moving stadiums like Arsenal to The Emirates. Renaming Stamford Bridge after 150 years of its existence will not work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts