Jump to content

Lionel Messi


Myself
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

As I said recently, if we want to sign Messi, we will have to negotiate with Barcelona and we can not signing Messi through the payment clause of Messi because in Spain this type of clauses is the player himself pays its own clause with its soil ( this is only in legal terms, in practice it is the club that aims to signing that player who really pay this amount of money, not the player) .a

Therefore, by the Spanish tax system, the signing of Messi by paying its clause would mean ₤ 200 million (€ 250 million) + ₤ 100 million (€ 150 million) in taxes, So the final amount would be: ₤ 300 million (€ 400 million), totally prohibitive for us for the rule of FIFA's Financial Fair Play and by simple logic amount. This would be an illogical amount.

So I think that Messi is campaigning to wear his relationship with Barcelona and thus force him to Barcelona to negotiate for an amount much lower than the amount on its clause: ₤ 200 million (€ 250 million) + ₤ 100 million (€ 150 million) in taxes.

I will put the link to the website of sports newspaper called Sport, which is a newspaper of you can say that is the official newspaper of FC Barcelona and Barcelona TV, although this is not official, the sports newspaper Sport is unofficially a newspaper essentially partisan of FC Barcelona. They defends that signing Messi is impossible because they are not interested lose a player like Messi
Therefore I tell you that Barcelona finally going to negotiate that amount because in Spain these clauses are put to scare other teams so they do not try to convince the player (Messi) so he betrays his club. For example, the clause Cristiano Ronaldo are ₤ 776.70 million (€ 1,000 million). An impossible amount, is a deterrent clause.

Final price payment of the clause Lionel Messi.
According to the Spanish tax system (in legal terms it is the player who pays the amount stated in its own clause)
₤ 200 million (€ 250 million) + ₤ 100 million (€ 150 million) in taxes.
So the
final amount would be: ₤ 300 million (€ 400 million).
An impossible amount, is a deterrent clause.
The important part of the news.
All economists and analysts polled by this wording ensures that the operation is completely unfeasible under some normal parameters. In England, for example, the current rate, in the case of Leo Messi, amount to 50%. That is, if the club refers to any prospective purchaser of the Premier to the termination clause, and the player himself who deposited the heel to the LFP after submit the club, Chelsea, United or any other should satisfy 250 million contract referred euros plus taxes from the player, 125 extra 'millions'. In the case of Real Madrid, we must add 21% IVA (the name of the tax), corresponding. Astronomical figures also seems difficult to amortize if we consider the more than 20 million net per season than currently perceived crack in wages.

So adidas just pay some money to Barca and Chelsea don't incur nearly so much cost? None of us could know what happens/what is possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. Maybe not directly Adidas who would pay a lot of money to Barcelona, but maybe if Adidas improve the conditions of our contract with them and increase of the quantity that we receive each year while being sponsored by adidas. Reports speak that Adidas would be willing to pay £ 76.37 million (€ 100 million) to help a team Adidas (Chelsea, United ...) so that the team can sign Messi.

Then, Adidas could renegotiate their contract with us and we agree with them that the amount of money that we receive each year from Adidas rise by £ 15.27 million ( 20 million) annually in the next five years (additional amount to which we have already received each year by Adidas).

£ 15.27 million ( 20 million) + £ 15.27 million ( 20 million) + £ 15.27 million ( 20 million) + £ 15.27 million ( 20 million) + £ 15.27 million ( 20 million) = £ 76.37 million ( 100 million) of additional benefits per year for us from ADIDAS, and nobody could accuse us of breaking the rules of the financial Fair play because we would end our sanitized economic balance.

I think the final amount of the transfer of Messi by us will be 114.56 million, which would be the most expensive player in football history. Messi has begun an operation to cut off his signing. If Kaka cost £ 50.69 million (€ 65 million), Cristiano Ronaldo £ 74.09 million (€ 95 million), Gareth Bale £ 70.30 million ( 92.05 million), Neymar Also cost £ 70.30 million ( 92 million) or so, Luis Suarez £ 64.05 million ( 83 million), Zidane, though long ago but Still Remains The most expensive signings in history, cost £ 58.58 million ( 75 million). I think it's impossible for Messi eventually cost £ 200 million ( 250 million). This would not have any sense.

Moreover, in the thread World Exclusive News of this forum, we see Chelsea has broken its negotiations with Turkish Airlines (which gave him £ 25 million per year, 32 million per year as supply), and now has an agreement with Chelsea Yokohama for between £ 30 million ( 39.28 million and 40 million ( 52.38 million) per year. Maybe the difference between the offer of Turkish Airlines and supply of Yokohama is because we are going to make a major signing this summer (hopefully it Messi).

As I said in this topic, signings like Messi does not make you lose money, signings like Messi make you earn money. They are a perfect business.

Regards.

Edited by supporter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You