Closed Bayern Munich 2-2 Chelsea

[Chelsea Legend 11 4,062]

I mean all the time after the 8th minute when we scored and did not want to get another, allowing Bayern to press us because we were more concerned bout trying to end the game at 1-0 at the risk of situations like the Ribery goal which would have rendered the previous tactic of closing down at 1-0 academic.

I give up... DO YOU EVEN KNOW HOW WE GOT UP 1-0???

[ulsterchelsea 3,221]

Boys did well tonight. Lets be right here, Bayern offered much more In an attacking sense but we dug in well and with 10 men for 45-50 minutes we held our own. I'd be happy to meat this lot in the CL with a few months playing time under our belt. Lukakus pen was wank but I've seen players much more experienced hit similar pens so hopefully he'll learn

[zolayes 14,489]

of course it was Jose being stupid and not bringing Mata when we were down to 10 men,,,rubber bullets knows best

[didierforever 7,349]

I already addressed you posts and it was detailing my disagreements with the tactics used. Try and process that information better please.

Rubber bullets, on 31 Aug 2013 - 03:52 AM, said:

But the problem was that it looked like we had no plan b.So we were limited to half chances.

4 on 3 is not half chances. even a decent ball (not a good or a great ball) would have led to a goal then. we on the other hand frustrated bayern and forced them to shoot from range. if we had half chances, they dint even have that. chelsea was the team that was looking more probable to score than bayern.

also plan B- is when plan A fails. i seriously dont think that happened today.

that was the last time u replied to my post and my reply to it. its still in the thread a couple of pages back. go and have a look.

seems u r here just to pass some time,,, heh TROLL...

[Rubber bullets 1,183]

I will leave it to the others to educate you ,,,read and learn

If I need to learn (as you claim) it won't be from a pretentious self-obsessed man like you.

[Pizy 18,911]

Just made the mistake of visiting a few other teams' forums for their thoughts.

My god they absolutely HATE Mourinho! I knew people from other sides disliked him, but these toads on RAWK and RedCafe make him sound like scum.

[Rubber bullets 1,183]

I give up... DO YOU EVEN KNOW HOW WE GOT UP 1-0???

Yes because we actually wanted to score to get in the lead. But I'm arguing that we should have not used the tactic of trying to close the game out becuase incidents like the Ribery goal can happen. I've been saying this the whole time.

My god, some people are really, really stupid.

[zolayes 14,489]

If I need to learn (as you claim) it won't be from a pretentious self-obsessed man like you.

of course you know EVERYTHING already

[didierforever 7,349]

of course it was Jose being stupid and not bringing Mata when we were down to 10 men,,,rubber bullets knows best

yup, i think jose should have subbed off cahill for mata.

LETS GO ATTACK. should be our motto.

[zolayes 14,489]

I give up... DO YOU EVEN KNOW HOW WE GOT UP 1-0???

Im pretentious and you are you are stupid ,,,

[Chelsea Legend 11 4,062]

Yes because we actually wanted to score to get in the lead. But I'm arguing that we should have not used the tactic of trying to close the game out becuase incidents like the Ribery goal can happen. I've been saying this the whole time.

My god, some people are really, really stupid.

No it was off of a counter! the same tactic that was employed all game and worked for most of it. Stop looking at the possession stats, we played a very good game tactically and with luck we would've hoisted the cup. The tactics weren't the problem at all.

[Rubber bullets 1,183]

Rubber bullets, on 31 Aug 2013 - 03:52 AM, said:

4 on 3 is not half chances. even a decent ball (not a good or a great ball) would have led to a goal then. we on the other hand frustrated bayern and forced them to shoot from range. if we had half chances, they dint even have that. chelsea was the team that was looking more probable to score than bayern.

also plan B- is when plan A fails. i seriously dont think that happened today.

that was the last time u replied to my post and my reply to it. its still in the thread a couple of pages back. go and have a look.

seems u r here just to pass some time,,, heh TROLL...

And most of those crosses only had 1 or 2 players in the box with not much chance of a Chelsea player connecting to them.So in a sense they were half chances most of our players where in the other half playing out the closing down the game tactics. After the first goal it was pretty much Bayern on the front foot with only a few breaks of us trying to pull off unsuccessful counter attacks.

You really have a hard time processing this.

[didierforever 7,349]

I'm just gonna say it... About all Frank did today was hit the pen... He was awful today.

dude,,, he is a troll... let him be. i have had the same discussion with him. gave him instances when we had chances like the 4 on 3 where torres' cross was not good.

but he just stopped replying and is now having the same argument with u.

[Rubber bullets 1,183]

of course you know EVERYTHING already

Never claimed too. Its you that tries to barge in everything and think you god's gift to knowledge on everything in the world.

[Mustafa 885]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiWPc1pZIng

[TrippingStep 336]

Rubber bullets, on 31 Aug 2013 - 03:52 AM, said:

4 on 3 is not half chances. even a decent ball (not a good or a great ball) would have led to a goal then. we on the other hand frustrated bayern and forced them to shoot from range. if we had half chances, they dint even have that. chelsea was the team that was looking more probable to score than bayern.

also plan B- is when plan A fails. i seriously dont think that happened today.

that was the last time u replied to my post and my reply to it. its still in the thread a couple of pages back. go and have a look.

seems u r here just to pass some time,,, heh TROLL...

The biggest one when we outnumbered them was when Torres shooted while Hazard was alone on the left.

[The_Flash 1,144]

I can't understand why he didnt play mata.

I thought we did brilliantly as Jose said before the game, he wanted to see a game involving Pep that didnt end in scandal and sadly he still hasn't. The game was typical BM, cheating, carrying on, it was pathetic, the whole game thy tried to get the chelsea players in trouble and practically our whole team had a car but bizarrely whe they CONSTANTLY badly tackled us he had lost his cards. The ref was a joke. So many poor decisions, every few seconds they had a free kick or corner. They spent more time tryingo Einstein free kicks than just playing. That guy in agony needs a stretcher then up quick back on, lol it was another example, thre is no use for all this new technology when Ref are going to engineer results which they did.

It was so dissapointing 30 ET I really thought we had won. Absolutely Gutted.

However as Jose said the best team lost, playing against such a 'brilliant" team with ten men and winning. I am so gutted I could feel the victory so close but then just a joke.

God even Fernando got a goal, bless him.

The real chance to win he game was when they guy slipped and Oscar should have buried it and the game.

But we did well despite all their **** just gutted for the lads and for Jose, he really wanted to beat Pep

[Wilson 358]

Cech. Absolutely gutted for the lads but really poor pen from Lukaku. Felt sorry for him but annoyed at the same time. I hate the stutter penalty it's cocky and it didn't pay off. I actually cried when we lost in pens, so angry that Martinez got that goal! We defended so well.

[Rubber bullets 1,183]

No it was off of a counter! the same tactic that was employed all game and worked for most of it. Stop looking at the possession stats, we played a very good game tactically and with luck we would've hoisted the cup. The tactics weren't the problem at all.

Most of our counters led to nothing, because there were hardly enough men in the pitch to create chances. At best we were relying on half chances and hoping the defense would make a mistake, not the best way to get the important second goal.

[didierforever 7,349]

And most of those crosses only had 1 or 2 players in the box with not much chance of a Chelsea player connecting to them.So in a sense they were half chances most of our players where in the other half playing out the closing down the game tactics. After the first goal it was pretty much Bayern on the front foot with only a few breaks of us trying to pull off unsuccessful counter attacks.

You really have a hard time processing this.

unsuccessful counters like the one where we were 4 on 3. huh??? also when you play a counter attacking game you generally have just 1 or 2 players in the box specially when its pretty clear only our top 4 were involved in the attack. after the first goal, it was still us pretty much causing bayern a hell lot of problem.

you really have a hard time understanding english. or just like to act stupid???