MCM4PR3Z 411 Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 Yeah, we need Griezmann, Bale, Reus or Yarmonlenko for the other wing. We depend too much on Eden alone now and we need better attacking players to win the CL. Maybe De Bruyne for AM also ?Hazard had the all time assists in one season record of the Ligue 1 in his hands (16 assists). Yesterday evening, Dimitri Payet of Olympique Marseille also gave his 16th Ligue 1 assist this season. Next week, he can break Edens record... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stroey 2,525 Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 have a big difference:Fabregas Muzchap 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLyon 9,359 Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 Yeah, we need Griezmann, Bale, Reus or Yarmonlenko for the other wing. We depend too much on Eden alone now and we need better attacking players to win the CL. Maybe De Bruyne for AM also ?Hazard had the all time assists in one season record of the Ligue 1 in his hands (16 assists). Yesterday evening, Dimitri Payet of Olympique Marseille also gave his 16th Ligue 1 assist this season. Next week, he can break Edens record...SIGN PAYET!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamad138 190 Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 Guys im not sure if this is rubish. But apparently eden hazrads family and agent were in the match dortmund vs bayern. Apparently bayern and espescially addidas wants to sign him for munich. They offered chelsea 100million for hazard. http://m.sportnet.at/home/fussball/international/deutschland/fcbayernmuenchen/4733093/index.do Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magic Lamps 11,692 Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 Guys im not sure if this is rubish. But apparently eden hazrads family and agent were in the match dortmund vs bayern. Apparently bayern and espescially addidas wants to sign him for munich. They offered chelsea 100million for hazard.http://m.sportnet.at/home/fussball/international/deutschland/fcbayernmuenchen/4733093/index.doUtter Bullshit IMO. Bayern have like 120m in reserve so they could just afford a 100m transfer. But they need a major rebuild so they will not spend all that on one player. Also he just signed an extension so it would take more than 100m for us to be convinced to sell him. Chelsea clearly has the leverage here.Bayern should stay with their average bundesliga players to replace their rotten core of stone aged has-beens. Hazard is two or three classes above that shithole. blu35_army and Barbara 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBlueGuy 1,552 Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 100m for Hazard is pretty good, we can sign Reus for 40m and maybe ask for Gotze in exchange as well as he has fallen out with Pep and Bayern legends. 2 great players to replace 1 great player with lot of money to spare and improve other areas.Imo Reus is better than Hazard offensively and his record proves this. He isn't as good at dribbling but that is about the only area he is behind Hazard, he is better at everything else. Leif 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CurlyHairLikeLuiz 1,625 Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 Guys im not sure if this is rubish. But apparently eden hazrads family and agent were in the match dortmund vs bayern. Apparently bayern and espescially addidas wants to sign him for munich. They offered chelsea 100million for hazard.http://m.sportnet.at/home/fussball/international/deutschland/fcbayernmuenchen/4733093/index.doAnd why would Adidas want that, it doesn't reflect well when you rob one of your clients for a quick buck - and consdering we as a club are on the brink of becoming the next super club of the football age, it would be even more short sighted considering I think Nike would pay good money to rebuild their kit fleet.And as the other guy said, they need to replace Schweinsteiger, Alonso, Ribery, Robben, Lahm, and maybe Boateng - spending £200m (Jose would not sell for any less) on Hazard would be an incredibly negligent thing to do for the club. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBlueGuy 1,552 Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 And why would Adidas want that, it doesn't reflect well when you rob one of your clients for a quick buck - and consdering we as a club are on the brink of becoming the next super club of the football age, it would be even more short sighted considering I think Nike would pay good money to rebuild their kit fleet.And as the other guy said, they need to replace Schweinsteiger, Alonso, Ribery, Robben, Lahm, and maybe Boateng - spending £200m (Jose would not sell for any less) on Hazard would be an incredibly negligent thing to do for the club.200m haha you really believe he would cost that? maybe 100m max, 200m is basically just a joke they can spend 200m, 100m on Hazard is decent especially if they can sell others like Gotze for around 30m as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CurlyHairLikeLuiz 1,625 Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 200m haha you really believe he would cost that? maybe 100m max, 200m is basically just a joke they can spend 200m, 100m on Hazard is decent especially if they can sell others like Gotze for around 30m as well.IMO Jose would not sell for less than that. We have no reason to sell and even if we get Reus would not improve our team. guddy6969 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBlueGuy 1,552 Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 IMO Jose would not sell for less than that. We have no reason to sell and even if we get Reus would not improve our team.Pretty sure at the end of the day it is still the club's decision and not purely Jose, although he will get a big say in it I guess. Agreed we don't need to sell, it all depends on Hazard really and so far he seems really happy to stay so we shouldn't be worried. However imo in case he changes his mind it is fine too if we sign Reus and Gotze+ getting like 40m left over from Hazard transfer.Reus will definitely score more than Hazard would for us if he stays fit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! bouletje 82 Posted May 17, 2015 Popular Post! Share Posted May 17, 2015 100m for Hazard is pretty good, we can sign Reus for 40m and maybe ask for Gotze in exchange as well as he has fallen out with Pep and Bayern legends. 2 great players to replace 1 great player with lot of money to spare and improve other areas.Imo Reus is better than Hazard offensively and his record proves this. He isn't as good at dribbling but that is about the only area he is behind Hazard, he is better at everything else.Can't tell if you are serious, I hope you are not. guddy6969, ILoveLamp, Barbara and 3 others 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! Thor 2,702 Posted May 18, 2015 Popular Post! Share Posted May 18, 2015 Imo Reus is better than Hazard offensivelyI had a good, long, chesty laugh at this. Brilliant joke man. I love how well you sold it. You actually made me believe the best take on dribbler in the world and chance creator in the EPL was inferior to Reus. iseah100, Chelsea Legend 11, dUMB and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! Special Juan 28,141 Posted May 18, 2015 Popular Post! Share Posted May 18, 2015 100m for Hazard is pretty good, we can sign Reus for 40m and maybe ask for Gotze in exchange as well as he has fallen out with Pep and Bayern legends. 2 great players to replace 1 great player with lot of money to spare and improve other areas.Imo Reus is better than Hazard offensively and his record proves this. He isn't as good at dribbling but that is about the only area he is behind Hazard, he is better at everything else.I'm all for opinions and that but it's probably best you go for a cold shower. commilin, guddy6969, Chelsea Legend 11 and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leif 6,006 Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 100m for Hazard is pretty good, we can sign Reus for 40m and maybe ask for Gotze in exchange as well as he has fallen out with Pep and Bayern legends. 2 great players to replace 1 great player with lot of money to spare and improve other areas.Imo Reus is better than Hazard offensively and his record proves this. He isn't as good at dribbling but that is about the only area he is behind Hazard, he is better at everything else.turn the heat of your shower up & enjoy a warm one, there's nothing wrong with this opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBlueGuy 1,552 Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 I'm all for opinions and that but it's probably best you go for a cold shower.I had a good, long, chesty laugh at this. Brilliant joke man. I love how well you sold it. You actually made me believe the best take on dribbler in the world and chance creator in the EPL was inferior to Reus.Stats:2012/13, 2013/14, 2014/15 season stats of both:Appearances-GoalsHazard: 62-13, 49-17, 49-19Reus: 47-19, 43-23, 24-11Buts its ok...carry on because Hazard is a Chelsea player he is the 3rd best in the world after Messi and Ronaldo not even a debate init. Now wait until people start to talk about how stats are useless and Hazard dribble more track back more and all the other reasons.Maybe it is hard to prove who is better, but outright dismissive of the argument just because Hazard is a Chelsea player is just Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pacquiao 1,834 Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 Stats:2012/13, 2013/14, 2014/15 season stats of both:Appearances-GoalsHazard: 62-13, 49-17, 49-19Reus: 47-19, 43-23, 24-11Buts its ok...carry on because Hazard is a Chelsea player he is the 3rd best in the world after Messi and Ronaldo not even a debate init. Now wait until people start to talk about how stats are useless and Hazard dribble more track back more and all the other reasons.Maybe it is hard to prove who is better, but outright dismissive of the argument just because Hazard is a Chelsea player is just Oh dear, so is that how you compare wingers by how many goals they score?especially comparing one in the bundesliga to one in the PL!you only have to look at Franco Di Santo he scored 14 goals in 137 games in english football and has scored 13 goals in 19 games this season for Werder Bremen, see the difference? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weckerz 3,781 Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 nananananananana statman strikes againMaybe it is hard to prove who is better, but outright dismissive of the argument just because Hazard is a Chelsea player is just Not for you apparently as Reus is better at everything but dribbling. Now list stats relevant to wingers, not strikers. dUMB and Stingray 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iseah100 5,612 Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 Come on guys, I'm probably the biggest Reus fan here, but i don't think he's better than Hazard. The gap is not as big as some make it out to be, Reus is better at some things and Hazard is better at others. They would compliment each other well imo. babu and DYC. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! Madmax 9,219 Posted May 18, 2015 Popular Post! Share Posted May 18, 2015 Surprise surprise, Hazard leads in much more 'than just dribbles', though Reus is an absolute quality player. The numbers don't lie.It's amazing just how strong the new toy syndrome is for some when it comes to transfer rumours. Nevermind that Hazard is settled here and has the team built around him - hey, Reus and Gotze and cash looks appealing on paper so let's flog him. We should be looking to add Reus to Hazard; we're Chelsea, not Spurs. Pacquiao, stroey, Sheva. and 6 others 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stingray 9,441 Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 100m for Hazard is pretty good, we can sign Reus for 40m and maybe ask for Gotze in exchange as well as he has fallen out with Pep and Bayern legends. 2 great players to replace 1 great player with lot of money to spare and improve other areas.Imo Reus is better than Hazard offensively and his record proves this. He isn't as good at dribbling but that is about the only area he is behind Hazard, he is better at everything else.WTF [emoji85][emoji86][emoji87] Adnane 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.